РефератыИностранный языкUtUtilitarianism Essay Research Paper Despite making valid

Utilitarianism Essay Research Paper Despite making valid

Utilitarianism Essay, Research Paper


Despite making valid claims on justice, John Stuart Mill ?s attempt to


reconcile justice and utility is not successful. Mill explains how justice


dictates certain actions and results; however, he does not thoroughly explain


how each aspect promotes the most utility for all. In other words, Mill


describes how the different interpretations of justice are often interpreted,


while explaining that there is too individual interpretation, he demonstrates


how justice cannot be reconciled with utility. Mill begins his argument by


giving five interpretations of justice. First, is the notion that it is


?unjust to deprive a person of their liberty, property, or any other thing


which belongs to him?(Mill, 43). Next he goes on to describe how justice, when


interpreted as a legal right, should always be upheld and thoroughly obeyed.


Mill attacks this claim by explaining that laws are sometimes unjust, and that


most laws follow the general laws of what is morally right. Thus in most


instances, as Mill claims, laws are not needed. He then goes on to examine the


claim that justice can be correlated to what one ?deserves?(Mill, 44). This


claim also leaves too much room for individual pleasure. The next rule of


justice Mill discusses refers to the notion of faith. According to Mill this


rule is, ?not regarded as absolute, but as capable of begin overruled by a


stronger obligation of justice on the other side??(Mill, 44). Lastly, Mill

<
br />

explains how being ?partial? is not in accordance with justice. By


disallowing partiality, a general interpretation of justice warrants


impartiality, which then would in turn promote the most utility for all.


According to Mill the notion that justice promotes ?impartiality? is a


contradiction. Mill declares that ?equality?, which emerges from


impartiality, cannot exist in a hierarchical society. Furthermore, he says that,


?those who think that utility requires distinctions of rank do not consider it


unjust that riches and social privileges should be unequally dispensed?(Mill,


45). Mill conveys the idea that justice has a flaw in that is allows for


different people to have different levels of utility. This placing of one


group?s desires for utility above another?s is congruent to the act-utlilitarian?s


claim that all actions should are determined by their consequences. Thus, under


act-utilitarianism one may be impartial as long his or actions promote the best


consequences, which in this case would deprive not promote a shred utility. In


conclusion, Mill reiterates that does not have a clear understanding of the


common link between the different interpretations of justice. He states,


?among so many diverse applications of the term ?justice?, which yet is


not regarded as ambiguous, it is a matter of some difficulty to seize the mental


link which holds them together, and on which the moral sentiment adhering to the


term essentially depends?(Mill, 45).

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Utilitarianism Essay Research Paper Despite making valid

Слов:505
Символов:3499
Размер:6.83 Кб.