РефератыИностранный языкInInvestigating Factors Hich Affect The Period Time

Investigating Factors Hich Affect The Period Time

Of A Simple Pendulum Essay, Research Paper


Investigating factors which affect the period time of a simple


pendulum Planning Definitions: Oscillation : Repeated motion of pendulum (to and for)


Period (T) : Time taken for one full oscillation In this investigation, I am going to experimentally determine a factor which


will affect the period of a simple pendulum and the mathematical relationship


of this factor. This type of pendulum will consist of a mass hanging on a length


of string. Factors which affect the period (T) of a pendulum:


-Length (L) of pendulum


-Angle of amplitude


-Gravitational field strength (g)


-Mass of bob I predict that the period will be affected by the length of the pendulum. An


increase in length will produce an increase in time. I based by prediction on


the scientific theory I found in a physics text book: The pendulum is able to work when the bob is raised to an angle larger than


the point at which it is vertically suspended at rest. By raising the bob, the


pendulum gains Gravitation Potential Energy or GPE, as in being raised, it is


held above this point of natural suspension and so therefore is acting against


the natural gravitational force. Once the bob is released, this gravitational


force is able to act on it, thus moving it downwards towards its original


hanging point. We can say therefore, that as it is released, the GPE is


converted into Kinetic Energy (KE) needed for the pendulum to swing. Once


the bob returns to its original point of suspension, the GPE has been totally


converted into KE, causing the bob to continue moving past its pivot point and


up to a height equidistant from its pivot as its starting point. The same factors affect the pendulum on its reverse swing. GPE gained after


reaching its highest point in its swing, is converted into KE needed for it to


return back to its natural point of vertical suspension. Due to this continuous


motion, the bob creates an arc shaped swing. The movement of the pendulum


is repeated until an external force acts on it, causing it to cease in movement.


The pendulum never looses any energy, it is simply converted from one form


to another and back again.


I am therefore going to experimentally determine the relationship between the


length of the pendulum and the period.


In the scientific theory, I found a formula relating the length of the pendulum


to the period. It stated that: P = 2 L


g P = The period


g = Gravitational Field Strength


L = Length of string This formula shows that L is the only variable that when altered will affect the


value of P, as all the other values are constants. The formula:P = 2 L


g can be rearranged to produce the formula: P = 4L


g and therefore:P = 4


L g As 4 and g are both constants, this means that P must be directly


proportional to L. I can now say that the length of the pendulum does have an affect on the


period, and as the length of the pendulum increases, the length of the period


will also increase.


I will draw a graph of P against L. As they are directly proportional to each


other, the predicted graph should show a straight line through the origin:Method


-I will firstly set up a clamp stand with a piece of string 50cm long


attached to it.


-A mass of 50g will be attached securely to the end of the string


-The mass will be held to one side at an angle of 45 degrees (measured


with a protractor), and then released.


-A stop clock will be used to time taken for one full oscillation


-This will be repeated a number of times, each time shortening the


length of string by 10cm


-The length of the pendulum will be plotted against the period on a


graph. NB. The final length of string and mass will be decided after my preliminary


investigation. Apparatus:


-Meter ruler


-Protractor


-Clamp stand


-G-clamp


-Stop clock


-String


-Mass Diagram: The following factors will be considered when providing a fair test:


-The mass will be a constant of 50g throughout the experiment


-Angle of amplitude shall be a constant of 45 degrees. This will ensure


that there is no variation of the forces acting on the pendulum.


-The value of gravitational field strength will inevitably remain constant,


helping me to provide a fair test.


-The intervals between the string lengths will increase by 10cm each


time. This will help me to identify a clear pattern in my results.


-If any anomalous results are identified, readings will be repeated. This


will ensure that all readings are sufficiently accurate.


-To ensure that the velocity is not affected, I will ensure that there are no


obstructions to the swing of the pendulum. The following factors will be considered when providing a safe test:


-Care will be taken not to let the bob come into contact with anything


whilst swinging the pendulum, as the weight is relatively heavy (50g)


-The clamp stand will be firmly secured to the bench with a G-clamp so


that the clamp stand will not move, affecting the results.


-Excessively large swings will be avoided (angle of amplitude will be 45


degrees Results of preliminary investigation: Length of string (cm)Period (secs) 502.58 402.31 302.11 201.78 101.39


My preliminary investigation was successful. The results from my table back


up my prediction that, as the length of the pendulum increases, the period


increases. I learned from my preliminary investigation that my proposed method may


not give me sufficiently accurate results. These results may be inaccurate due


to a slight error of measurement in time, height or length. Although this


experiment produced no anomalies, I will take three readings of each value


during my final experiment and take an average. I will also measure the time


taken for 5 oscillations rather that 1 and then divide the result by 5. These


two changes will hopefully help me to identify and eliminate anomalies,


should they occur. They should also add to the accuracy of my results. Obtaining Evidence I used the method proposed in my plan, taking three readings of each value


and measuring the time taken for 5 oscillations rather than for 1. During the


experiment, I observed that each oscillation for the same length of string


seemed to be equal. This showed that the pendulum did not slow down as the


number of oscillations increased. I took the safety measures described in my


original plan. During the experiment I was careful to use accurate measurements in order to


obtain sufficiently accurate results, for example:


-The string was measured with a meter ruler, to the nearest mm, to


ensure that each measurement had a difference of exactly 10cm.


-The angle of amplitude will be measured with a protractor to the


nearest degree to ensure that the angle remains constant throughout


the experiment.


-A stop clock will be used to measure the period accurately. The period


was measured in seconds, with the stop clock measuring to the degree


of two decimal places of a second. However, I have rounded up each


time to the nearest second to give appropriate results.


-The mass was measured using five10g masses, to ensure that the mass


remained constant throughout the experiment. Results:


Length of string (cm)Period (secs)


507.2


8.1


6.45 406.25


6.6


6.4 305.6


5.2


6.15


204.55


4.5


4.6 102.95


3.25


3.0 I took three readings of each value and took an average for each concentration.


I then divided by 5 to get the average reading for one oscillation. This again


should influence the accuracy of my results. Table of averages:


Length of string (cm)Period (secs)


501.45 401.28 301.13 200.91 100.61 Using the formula, T = 2 L


g


found in the Scientific Theory, I calculated the perfect results that should have


been obtained, had my experiment followed the formula exactly:


Length of string (cm)Period (secs)_


501.44 401.25 301.07 200.91 100.64


Using my averaged results, I squared P to show the relationship between P


and L: Length of string (cm)Period (secs)_


502.1 401.64 301.28 200.83 100.37 As all my results were accurate, I had no need to repeat any of them. However,


had there been an anomalous result, or had I come across any problems, I


would have repeated my results to identify the cause and eliminate anomalies.


Analysing evidence and concluding Using the results from my table, I drew a graph to show what had been


obtained from the experiment (see graph A). The graph clearly shows a


smooth curve with a positive gradient. This indicates that as the length of the


pendulum is increased, the period will increase. Although my second graph (see graph B), does not show a perfect straight line


through the origin, a line of best fit can be drawn to show this. This backs up


the theory in my scientific knowledge, that P is directly proportional to L,


i.e. if the length of string was doubled, the period would be doubled. My table of results drawn from my experiment was extremely similar to the


results produced from the scientific formula, showing that my experiment was


successful. My two graphs showed resemblance to my predicted graphs,


indicating that my results were sufficiently accurate and therefore, my


proposed method was reliable for this experiment. My findings indicate that the time period varies directly with the length of the


string when all other factors remain constant.


Evaluating The evidence obtained from my experiment supported my prediction that as


the length of the pendulum increases, the period increases. This is also shown


in Graph A, as the graph displays a smooth curve with a positive gradient. My


method in squaring P was successful, as I discovered that T was directly


proportional to L, providing all other values remain constant. This was shown


by a straight line going through the origin (Graph B). These results were


encouraging and led me to believe that my proposed method was sufficient for


the experiment. Some of the results were not accurate, as they did not match the results


produced by the formula. This could have been due to human error. However,


the majority of my results were no more than a decimal place away from the


formula results and, therefore, quite reliable. Had there been any anomalous


results, I would have repeated my readings. Factors which may have affected the accuracy of my results include:


-Error in measurement of angle of altitude. This angle proved difficult to


measure and it was hard to get the exact same angle for each result. To


improve the accuracy of this measurement, I could have attached the


protractor to the clamp stand so that it was in a fixed position.


-Error in measurement of string. To improve the accuracy of this, I


could have marked off the points with a pen to ensure they were as


accurately measured as possible.


-Human reaction time. Depending on human reaction time, the


measurement period time could have been measured inaccurately, due


to slow reactions when setting the stop-clock etc. This could have been


improved by involving another person to aid me with my experiment,


for a quicker reaction time. The procedure was relatively reliable, excluding human error, and so I can


conclude that my evidence is sufficient to support a firm conclusion that: The only factor which affects the period of a simple pendulum is its


length. As the length increases, so does the period. If I were to extend my investigation, I would investigate to provide additional


evidence to back up my conclusion, for example, changing the mass or angle


of altitude. The results gained would hopefully aid me further in supporting


my Scientific Theory. It would also be interesting to investigate how the


factors are affected when the Gravitational Field Strength is different, i.e.. not


9.8 Newtons.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Investigating Factors Hich Affect The Period Time

Слов:2163
Символов:14028
Размер:27.40 Кб.