РефератыИностранный языкShShakespeare And Prospero Essay Research Paper There

Shakespeare And Prospero Essay Research Paper There

Shakespeare And Prospero Essay, Research Paper


There can be no doubt that The Tempest contains numerous references


to the theater, and while many of Shakespeare’s plays make reference to the


dramatic arts and their analogy to real life (e.g., “all the world’s a * stage”),


it is in this, his last play, that the Bard most explicitly acknowledges that the


audience is viewing a show. Thus, in the play’s final scene (Act I, scene i., ll.148ff),


Prospero tells his prospective son-in-law Ferdinand that the revels at hand


are almost at an end, that the actors are


about to retire, and that the “insubstantial pageant” of which he has been


a part has reached its conclusion. It is, in fact, tempting to equate the


character of Prospero with that of his creator, the playwright


Shakespeare.


When Prospero sheds his magician’s robes in favor of his civilian attire


as the Duke of Milan, with the benefit of hindsight that this is


Shakespeare’s last work and his crowning achievement, we are disposed to associate the


learned sorcerer with the Bard of Avon. How far we are to take this


identification, however, is moot.


Prospero of The Tempest, like Shakespeare in his late Romance period, is a


mature man with a daughter (Shakespeare, in fact, had two daughters, his


only son dying in childhood) at the height of his intellectual and


creative powers. Prospero is a polymath, a scholar with a magic book from an entire


library that so absorbed him that it was, “dukedom large enough” (I, ii.


l.110). Prospero displays a tinge of regret for having neglected his


worldly office as Duke of Milan in favor of the life of the mind. Similarly, as


virtually all of Shakespeare’s biographers have observed, the Elizabethan


playwright’s knowledge was exceedingly broad, leading many to speculate


that he pursued a number of vocations before settling into a life in the


theater, and we know from textual correspondences that Shakespeare was broadly read


and that he continued to absorb knowledge from diverse publications until his


death. We can also speculate that Shakespeare regretted remaining away


from his home in Stratford, at least insofar as his career in London kept


him away from his children. Lastly, following The Tempest, Shakespeare,


like Prospero, retired to civilian life, there being a period of five or six


years between his composition of that play and his untimely death at the


age of fifty-two.


Beyond these surface biographical parallels, Prospero’s role is less that


of a character than that of the imaginative or creative force behind the play


itself. After the pageant of the goddesses who bless the union of Miranda


and Ferdinand, Prospero explains that the effigies which they have seen


are “Spirits, which by mine art/I have from their confines call’d to enact/My


present fancies” (IV, i., ll.120-121). Prospero underscores that what is


taking place in the play is under his control and is, in fact, his


creation.


Thus, when Miranda worries about the fate of those exposed to the


shipwreck at the start of the play, her father reassures her that despite the


appearances of disaster, none of the boat’s passengers or crew have been


harmed in the least. Like the playwright/director/producer that


Shakespeare was, Prospero remains in the background. Rather than confront the “three


>sinners” directly, he assigns the task of telling Alonso, Antonio, and


Sebastian why they have been brought to the island and of their need to


repent to Ariel, the magician remaining hidden from their view.


We gain the sense that Prospero performs multiple functions in the theater


of his own creation. Among these roles is that of critic. Prospero


repeatedly assesses the performance of his actors. Thusё in Act III, scene


iii, he says to Ariel, “Bravely the figure of this harpy hast


thou/Perform’d, my Ariel” (III, iii., ll.81-82), He also places Ferdinand


in the role of a traitor/lackey and judges the young man’s performance of


that part as a means of determining his worthiness to wed Miranda. To his


credit, Prospero also critiques his own direction, apologizing to Ferdinand for


inflicting punishments upon him that may have seemed too austere (IV, i.,


ll.1-2). Like Shakespeare, then, Prospero’s relation to the theater is


multi-dimensional; he is an actor in the play, he is the creator of its


most spectacular scenes and its over-arching dramatic lines, he is the director


of others, and, lastly, he acts as critic of the performances turned in by


his actors and his own part in the play.


Shakespeare’s plays were performed on an outdoor stage without lighting.


Starting in the early afternoon, they had to be completed before sundown


and many of theme require temporal precision in the entrances and exits of


cast members and the use of special effects, e.g., the moaning of the ghost in


Hamlet. That being so, both the amount of time elapsed and the occurrence


of narrative events was crucial to the success of the performance. In his


capacity as stage manager, Prospero is continuously concerned with time.


At the very start of the play, Prospero says to Miranda that “The hour is now


come/The very minute bids thee ope ear” (I, ii., ll.37-38) to the story of


how they were shipwrecked together on the island a dozen years or more


beforehand. The reason that it is time for Miranda to learn of her


background (and it is remarkable that she has not asked about it sooner)


lies in dramatic circumstance: it is time for Miranda to be told who she


is because the miscreants who wronged her and her father are now in lace to


repent of their misdeeds. Prospero repeatedly alludes to the need to keep


his plans on schedule, uses the word “now” more than forty times a salient


instances coming at the start of Act V, when he proclaims to Ariel and his


audience, “Now does my project gather to a head,” (V, i., l.1).


Like an Elizabethan stage manager, Prospero controls the pace and flow of events,


making sure that the proceedings occur within the allotted time period, in


proper order, and at the exact moment in the story’s progression.


Nevertheless, the identification between Prospero and Shakespeare is not


exact. For one thing, Prospero on the Island and in Milan, is an


aristocrat, a noble bound by solemn obligation to rule over his subjects. Shakespeare,


on the other hand, while honored by royalty never rose above the upper


ranks of the Elizabethan middle-class. By the same token, Prospero has no


commercial life, no concern with money or material gain. The same cannot


be said of his creator, Shakespeare having extensive financial interests in


real estate, commodity trading, and, above all, the theater itself.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Shakespeare And Prospero Essay Research Paper There

Слов:1207
Символов:7934
Размер:15.50 Кб.