Essay, Research Paper
The Philosophy of Truth Making You Free
There exists a philosophy that, the truth will make you free. For example,
exposing a conspiracy that does yourself and others harm can only set you free
from further harm and related mischief. Whether or not the conspirators are the
criminals of society or the highest branches of our own government. Injustice
spreads like a virus and it needs to be stopped while there is still a way. The
effects of such an act can only free us and make us more aware of such
corruptness.
Moreover, a conspiracy spawned by criminals in society, to cause harm,
will no doubt enslave the public both mentally and physically. The society will
see the injustice happening but will not know from where it is being caused.
This effect will be expressed in the sort of decisions they make and company
they keep. A more defensive society cannot feel free until the conspiracy is
brought to light, that is until the truth is told and the harm is stopped,
society cannot be free.
Furthermore, a harmful conspiracy in the highest levels of our
governments prevents freedom on a greater scale. If the truth cannot be found in
the government that we elect, then what hope have we for progress. Mistrust and
suspicion will be the tools of this brand of enslavement. If the truth is
revealed then the uncovered conspiracy will free the public from the secrets and
lies and in essence keep the government honest.
First, the truth will make you free, is an irresponsible statement. To
reveal the truth is not necessarily the best solution to a conspiracy. When you
make the public aware of all that goes on whether it be what the criminals are
up to or the high officials of governments, then a little knowledge causes a lot
of unnecessary panic. A public with a truthful knowledge of what criminals have
been doing will become paranoid beyond belief. They become defensive and
suspicious of every person. That is how the truth can make you a prisoner of
your own devising.
Also, when this harmful conspiracy in the higher levels of society
becomes known, then a little truth can cause a lot of harm. The issues that the
government deals with are of such great consequence that, they will have to make
unpopular decisions and even make unscrupulous deals and from the products of
this practice, the public in turn will cause an unparalleled uproar that would
tear the fabric that holds a society together, if they knew the truth. Therefore
the truth cannot make you free, because the truth can do more harm than good.
Next is the statement, man is condemned to be free. That is that man is
free to ruin the world. Everyone has the choice of doing something helpful or
harmful in their everyday life. We are free to make others suffer and life a bit
harder than it already is now. The freedom that runs rampant in society allows
hate groups to form and march. It ties the hands of our officials and policemen
from protecting us all in the name of freedom. We are condemning ourselves to a
place that allows almost anyone to get weapons and the most unscrupulous people
into our government because they were free to sling mud at their opponent.
Therefore man is condemned by freedom because the fight for freedom is ongoing
and the more we try to restrict harmful behavior, the more rules are established
to get in the way of enforcement.
First, it is unthinkable that man can be condemned to be free. Man has
made great efforts to make the world better by spreading freedom. The freedom
to choose what is right for you is the most fundamental freedom that exists.
Rather than being weighed down by restriction of what you can and cannot do with
your life man has the freedom to decide on it’s own. It is because anyone can
run for office in government that we are free, life is not decided for us. We
have the freedom to make a mistake and the freedom of whether we want to learn
from it. This can only free a society, not condemn it. A world does not become
ruined by making those who enforce the law use a bit of human decency when <
dealing with those people whom have made bad decisions. Laws and regulations are
made to stop injustice, they should not be an excuse to infringe on another
person’s life. Therefore the idea that man is condemned to free is ludicrous,
man is privileged to be free to make the world what they want it to be good or
bad.
Next there is a statement of beauty is in the eye of the beholder. If you
were to ask a man what he considered to be beauty in a woman, perhaps he would
say it is the face, the body, or even the mind. However the quality of these
features and even how they are judged depend on the particular taste of this man.
Perhaps he enjoys the charms of a thin and fit woman of perfect shape or a
variety of shape that exists in other women. He may prefer an intellectual
person or even one that is not so keen on conversation. The details are infinite,
but regardless of what this man finds beautiful may not necessarily be the same
for every other man.
Moreover, the opinion of this one man is simply the product of his
education, both formal and private by countless people that range anywhere from
parent to complete stranger. Therefore by this condition it is easy to see that
not every man had his kind of education. However his view is his from what he
has learned, it does not mean that someone else with the same background will
have the same views, it simply means that these are his particular views that he
has formed based on that previous education. So beauty is truly in the eye of
the beholder.
Next, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, is simply not true. The man
in question based his opinion of beauty on standards that have already been set.
He most likely grew up seeing a particular kind of woman in advertisements,
television shows, and countless other sources that depicted what is beauty.
Human kind has been doing it for centuries, through artwork, literature, and
fashion it has always been made clear what physical and mental attributes are
commonly desired in women. In particular if this man says that he likes women
who are thin than this is because society has made great efforts to say that
obesity is not beauty. Health and beauty aids of a store supply products to make
someone thinner not fatter. Also if he prefers blonde haired women it is
because all the woman in the movies that were that were most desired had blonde
haired. Therefore any quality that this man can think of as beauty is beauty to
a great amount of men. So beauty exists in the woman that can meet societies
idea of what is beautiful.
Lastly there is a statement, science is the only valid way of knowing.
This is evident in the knowledge derived from scientific methods. When you use
scientific methods, you eliminate all other variables and conduct tests that are
objective and specific. Science explains the mysteries of the world with sound
tested theories that have not been conclusively proven wrong. When science finds
previous theories to be false, then it is false only because it has been
scientifically proven wrong. It is a practice that eliminates all doubts to
arrive at a plausible solution to whatever problem is present. Therefore if
knowledge has been established by science then it is valid and should be
accepted until science proves otherwise.
Now, the statement that says, science is the only valid way of knowing,
is false. Scientific method is based on estimated standards that are basically
estimated guesses. It is mere luck alone that makes it possible for scientific
theories to be proven true, otherwise why would there still be so many mysteries
to life, science cannot explain everything. It can eliminate variables and find
and test a solution, but many solutions that were found to be true turned out to
later be false. Luck and a lot of convincing made scientific fact finding sound
reasonable. For every explanation that science gives, there is an equal and
opposite reason why it may not be valid. Science cannot be the only valid way of
knowing because the knowledge gained from science is not completely valid.