РефератыИностранный языкLiLine Item Veto Essay Research Paper When

Line Item Veto Essay Research Paper When

Line Item Veto Essay, Research Paper


When the House passed the Line Item Veto legislation, in a strong bipartisan vote of 294-134, it


took great


strides toward assuring the American people that the purpose of government is to serve the needs of


all


Americans. It also indicated its intention to seriously address the budgetary problems created by


forty years of


elitist pork barrel arrogance by the majority party in Congress. Congressional approval will also take


away a


sinister political weapon, designed to distort the images presented to the people. Without the Line


Item Veto the


President was forced to either accept or reject any legislative proposal as it was written. Congress


learned the


trick of tacking on extra money for special projects, ones that usually helped fellow Representatives


or Senators


get reelected. In more blatant times they have actually increased Congressional salaries. In the article


one


example is cited by Rep. Joe Knollenberg of Michigan. Added to a bill to provide California !


earthquake relief


last year was $10 Million for a train station in New York and funds for sugar cane growers in


Hawaii. The


public is seldom aware of this ?extra? spending. Without the Line Item Veto the President must either


sign or


veto the bill with the pork attached. This ploy thus becomes a political weapon. If the President


vetoes it his


opponents can accuse him of not wanting to help Americans in need. U.S. Presidents since Ulysses


S. Grant


have all called for the Line Item Veto. In the article the new Speaker of The House was quoted as


saying


?President after president has said it was something that would be good for America because it


would allow the


president to cut out some of the worst in spending.? Opposition to the Line Item Veto argues it


would tip the


balance o

f power too heavily toward the White House. Another point postulated by those


concerned suggest


the President could use this power to favor one politician over another by selective use in lining out


budget


busting features of a given piece of legislation. This action, I feel, would stir such wrath of the


American voter, no


President would be willing to risk it. On the other hand, a weak president could use the Line Item


Veto to cut


spending and gain favor with the voters. Without the Line Item Veto the American taxpayer will be


subject to a


Congress more concerned with reelection than in serving the needs of the country. It is currently a


system rife


with corruption. The problem, as I perceive it, and I must admit there was no hint of it in the article I


read in the


Southern Illinoisan, is the nature of humanity. I contend human nature is such that is impossible to


have that many


people that close to power and in control of that much money for that long a period of time without


having some


form of corruption. All the values that make up the culture of America are at stake here and the


camps of special


interest on the subject break down to two: the American people and elected officials. The founding


fathers


would be repulsed that an issue like this would even be necessary. I?m certain they never envisioned


a Congress


with such a leaning toward their own special interest. Solutions are simple, pass the Line Item Veto


or allow the


current system to assist in driving the country into bankruptcy. Obviously the first solution is the one


preferred


and, with the recent turnover in Congress, we are going in that direction. Representative Bill Baker


of California


was quoted as saying, ?This week, we?re going to give the president, whoever the president is, the


tools to help


balance the budget.?

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Line Item Veto Essay Research Paper When

Слов:690
Символов:4535
Размер:8.86 Кб.