РефератыИностранный языкDiDifference Between Plutarchs And Shakespeares Julius Caesar

Difference Between Plutarchs And Shakespeares Julius Caesar

Essay, Research Paper


Plutarch’s and Shakespeare’s Caesar


Julius Caesar was in a precarious situation. It could be interpreted that he


deserved the fate that pursued him for ambition or some other reason, or that it


was a cold murder for which he did not deserve. Both Shakespeare and Plutarch


wrote about Julius Caesar. Each tells the story a little differently. Plutarchs version


is more sympathetic to Caear’s situation.


Shakespeare shows him to be an insensitive and conceited person thinking


only of himself. This is shown by his reaction to Calpurnia’s dream. After her


description of her dream he says, “Caesar shall forth. The things that threatened


me Ne’er looked but on my back; when they shall see the face of Caesar, they are


vanished.” This attitude to a warning implying that he was given fair warning and


his death was partially due to his over confidence. On the other hand Plutarch


gives him a more sensitive reaction to the dream in saying, “Caesar himself, it


seems was affected and by no means easy in his mind.”


Moreover, Plutarch’s wri

tings show the long string of coincidences almost


as Fate were deeming it necessary for him to die, and that he had no control over


it. “…the scene of the final struggle and of the assassination made it perfectly clear


that some heavenly power was involved…directing that it” (the assassination)


“should take place just here. For here stood a statue of Pompey…” This stating


that Caesar’s murder was the deceased Pompey’s revenge for he was killed by


Caesar. Whereas, Shakespeare does not say anything about the statue and


shows the same coincidences in the play as warnings to him that out of his own


stupidity he did not take.


Lastly, after Caesar’s death the Romans were enraged to revenge him at


the sight of his body and out of their love for him, in Plutarch’s writing. In


Shakespeare’s the Roman were enraged but quelled by Brutus’ speech and


enraged again by Antony’s. This showing the Roman to be mindless, moved only


by a good speech and not by their feelings for Caesar. This again showing


Plutarch’s writing to be more sympathetic to Caesar than Shakespear’s.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Difference Between Plutarchs And Shakespeares Julius Caesar

Слов:393
Символов:2543
Размер:4.97 Кб.