РефератыИностранный языкHaHamlet Essay Research Paper Literature of the

Hamlet Essay Research Paper Literature of the

Hamlet Essay, Research Paper


Literature of the Renaissance was far different from that of the


previous eras. Man was now thought of as the center of life, as opposed to


God being the center in earlier times. Also, man was thought to have free


will over his life, not being simply a pawn of the Gods. These new ideals


were presented in the theaters as well as written literature. The esteemed


William Shakespeare incorporated many of these components into some of


the greatest performed classics in the history of theater. Shakespeare’s


Hamlet contains elements that are derived from the Renaissance way of


thinking and influenced from it’s earlier writers.


The play continuously incorporates themes of free will of man in


controlling his destiny. This is ever present throughout the play as Hamlet


contemplates each of his actions. Some look at this as cowardice or


procrastination, but his deliberation is clearly recognized as his choosing of


his own fate. In previous eras, man came across as being locked into one


action, without a choice of what to do. In Act I Scene IV, Hamlet


provides three possible answers to the cause of evil. The first is an


inherited fault: “As, in their birth- wherein they are not guilty”, which does


not involve human responsibility. Another claims the individual as being a


victim of fate: “Fortune’s Star.” If that were the answer in Hamlet, then


the play could not be classified as a Renaissance tragedy, but one based on


the Medieval theory that individuals have no choice in their life. The


second offering includes “the o’ergrowth of some complexion, oft breaking


down the pales and forts of reason. . .” Here human responsibility is


obvious, defining the moral theory of the Renaissance.


Act II Scene II contains a speech by Hamlet to Rosencrantz and


Guidenstern that outlines the way man was viewed in Renaissance thinking.


“What a piece of work is man! How noble in reason, how infinite in


faculty, in form and moving how express and admirable, in action how like


an angel, in apprehension how like a god- the beauty of the world, the


paragon of animals!” Even though Hamlet goes on to say that “man


delights not me”, the speech still shows the Renaissance view on life. This


ideal was evident in the work of earlier Renaissance writers such as Pico


della Mirandola. In Pico’s Oration on the Dignity of Man, the “great


miracle” of humanity was discussed. “There is nothing to be seen more


wonderful than man. . .man is the intermediary between creatures, the


intimate of the gods, the king of the lower beings, by the acuteness of his


senses, by the discernment of his reason, and

by the light of his intelligence.


. .”


Also in Act II Scene II, the loveletter of Hamlet to Ophelia is being


discussed by Claudius, Gertrude, and Polonious. Although thought of as a


ploy by Hamlet to make everyone think he is mad, the first few lines may


have some distinctive significance: “Doubt thou the stars are fire, doubt


that the sun doth move. . . .” Doubts to the stars and the sun in the


universe came about in the Renaissance and represented a challenge to the


traditional view of the universe. Here Shakespeare incorporates the


current learning of the time period in the theater. This can also be


interpreted that Hamlet lost faith in traditional values after experiencing evil


and heartbreak.


Also in Act II Scene II, Hamlet is spurned by his two friends


Rosencrantz and Guildenstern and comes to the conclusion that man has a


terrifying capacity to reject reason and descend to the bestial level: Brother


may kill brother, friends may betray the sacred principles of friendship.


This is the case as Rosencrantz and Guidenstern allow themselves to be


used as spies of Hamlet by Claudius. The idea of descending to lower


levels of humanism was also derived from Pico’s Oration. “With freedom


of choice and with honor, as though the maker and molder of thyself, thou


mayest fashion thyself in whatever shape thou shalt prefer. Thou shalt have


the power to degenerate into the lower forms of life, which are brutish.”


Another symbol of the Renaissance idealism is the nature of


Claudius, who, although showing guilt over his actions, can be seen as a


Machiavellian. This of course comes Niccolo Machiavelli who wrote The


Prince, the book that supposedly theorized how an ideal prince should rule.


Machiavelli describes how the nature of man is evil and one should


whatever is neccessary to maintain power: “Taking everything into


account, he will find some of the things that appear to be virtues will, if he


practices them, ruin him, and some of the things that appear to be wicked


will bring him security and prosperity.” These Machiavellian concepts are


clearly defined by Claudius as he first kills his brother to claim the throne,


later sends his nephew Hamlet to be executed in England, and finally,


inadvertantly causes his wife’s demise from another plot to kill Hamlet.


The themes and ideas used in Hamlet are clearly seen as that of the


Renaissance thinking. Shakespeare’s use of notions first brought on by


early Renaissance writers shows his ability to incorporate modern thought


in drama. This modern thinking combined with old ideals characterized


what the Renaissance was all about.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Hamlet Essay Research Paper Literature of the

Слов:964
Символов:6288
Размер:12.28 Кб.