РефератыИностранный языкTuTurkish Occupation Of Northern Kurdistan Essay Research

Turkish Occupation Of Northern Kurdistan Essay Research

Turkish Occupation Of Northern Kurdistan. Essay, Research Paper


History of Turkish Occupation of Northern Kurdistan.


Eric jensen


Poli. Sci. (Third World Politics)


11/27/96


Since 1984, and especially the last few months, the domestic problems of a


major N.A.T.O, Middle Eastern, and American ally state have come to the


forefront of the international news scene. That state is the Republic of Turkey


and it’s primary troubles stem from the past seven decades of acrimonious


policies directed at the indigenous ethnic Kurds. The main problem, now, is the


Kurdish popular insurgency on it’s hands, in Turkish occupied Northern Kurdistan.


The Kurdish question has long been covered up and denied by the state of Turkey,


but recent events has forced Turkey to concede that it has a serious Kurdish


insurgency on its hands. Turkey’s inability to deal with this situation is the


result of the past seventy years of cultural, political, and human rights


abuses directed against the Kurdish population. In fact, this “separatism” is so


out of hand that the Turkish government has incessantly appealed to it’s allies


and advisories alike to help counter the escalating Kurdish asperation to


succeed from the Turkish republic. Turkey’s sputtering and deteriorating economy


is directly related to the long Kurdish struggle for independence. Turkey has


spent over eight billion dollars or twenty percent of her GDP to combat the ever


deteriorating predicament in northern Kurdistan, and should spend more in the


future(Laber). Because of the violence, the once prosperous tourist business of


Turkey, has now lost about $1.5 billion dollars annually since 1990. Many people


now talk openly of another possible military coup, there were three major


military coups during the last thirty years (Alister) These circumstances in the


state of Turkey have also hurt her chances of ever joining the ever wealthy


European Union and battering its ailing economic situation. The depth of


Turkey’s domestic and ethnic dilemma is one of the many that have arisen after


the end of the cold war, yet the cold war is a simple answer to a much more


complex one. The factors that have arisen to contribute to this civil war were


created far before Capitalism versus Communism, East versus West, or U.S versus


the Soviet Union. In order to really comprehend the holistic situation in


Turkey one must first be familiar with the complete history of the Turks and


Kurds.


The Kurds of Turkey constitutes, by far, the largest ethnic minority group in


Turkey. The estimate of their population, however, are very dubious because of


the past Turkish policy to deny the very existence of any minorities within the


borders of her state. In fact, past Turkish rhetoric has been that there is no


official Kurdish problem in Turkey, because officially no Kurds exist. We can


ascertain that the kurds make up between twenty-five and thirty-three percent


of the Turkey’s population. This would put the Kurdish population about twelve


to twenty million (Morris). Because of past and present forced Turkish


assimilation practices, the Kurds live in all parts of the country, but most of


the Kurdish population is concentrated in the southeastern part of Turkey. They


represent a high percentage of the population in fifteen provinces and take up a


total of thirty percent of all of Turkey (Kendal). Economically, the Kurds are


the poorest inhabitants of the country. The per capita of a Kurd is one-tenth of


a Turk living in Istanbul; well below the poverty line (McDowell). While the


rest of Turkey has modernized and adopted some capitalistic practices, the


Kurdish areas, by contrast, are underdeveloped and exploited by feudal landlords.


The wealth of the area is “drained and channeled to the Turkish metropolis


(Kendal).” Much of the region is relatively unchanged since the last seventy


years of Turkish rule or has suffered even worse economically. The thirty


million Kurds of the Middle East have lived in Kurdistan before record of modern


history was kept. The very first mention of the Kurds in history was about 3,000


BC, under the name Gutium., as they fought the Summerians(Spieser). Later around


800 BC, the Indo-European Median tribes settled in the Zagros mountain region


and coalesced with the Gutiums, and thus the modern Kurds speak from as Aryan


language (Morris). The Kurds are mentioned by Xenaphon, a Greek mercenary, as he


retreated from Persia with ten thousand men in 401 BC, he says of the Kurds,


“These people, lived in the mountains and were very war-like and not subject to


the Persian king. Indeed once a royal army of 120,000 thousand had once invaded


their country, and not a man of them came back..(Morris).” When the Arabs spread


Islam to the Middle East in the seventh century, most of the Kurds gradually


adopted the religion but fiercely resisted Arab rule, much like today in modern


day Iraq and Syria. This is evident in a legend about the prophet Mohammed;


when the prophet called all the princes of the world to embrace the new religion,


they all hurried to submit to the prophet of the new religion. When the Prophet


saw the Kurdish representative, named Zemin, with his giant size and piercing


eyes, the prophet prayed to God that such a terrifying people never unite as a


single nation (Morris). Around the tenth century the Kurds became a military


force to be reckoned with in the Middle East and defended Islam against the


invading Christian crusaders and defeated the Mongolian armies at both Cerq De


Chavalier and the fortress of Irbile. Saladine, and the majority of his troops


were Kurdish (Safrastian). The Kurds established independent principalities,


that never united, but often fought each other for the benefit of foreign powers.


During the harsh reign of Shah Ismail in Persia, most of the Kurds who were


Sunni Muslims, allied themselves with the Ottoman Sultan Selim “the Cruel” and


played the pivotal part in defeating the Persian armies at Chaldiran in 1514,


and thus most of the Kurds in Iran are still Sunni Muslims among a predominately


Shiite majority. The Kurdish principalities, at this time were free from the


central government and struck their own coinage and had Friday prayers in the


name of the local prince (Morris). At that point of Kurdish history Kurdish


culture and literature flourished. This lasted until the nineteenth century


when the Ottoman empire tried to expand its rule into the Kurdish territories.


Using the tool of divide and conquer, the Ottamans use Kurdish tribes to fight


fellow Kurds. Though, the Ottoman government gained nominal control of the


Kurdish areas, they were never able to establish direct rule(McDowell). During


World War One, many Kurds actually remained loyal to the Empire. They fought


bravely in many battles. The Kurds inflicted such heavy damages against the


Tsarist government that they almost conceded to evacuating the entire Caucus


region. Some historians also suggest, they were eighty percent of the Ottoman


casualties at the infamous battle of Galilopi (Gunter). During the war the Young


Turk government, in pursuit of a purely Turkic empire, massacred more then one


million Armenians and seven hundred thousand Kurds. After the Ottoman loss, the


Empire collapsed and was on the verge of fragmentation when a young army officer


by the name of Mustafa Kemal emerged on the scene.


Following the fatal defeat of the Ottoman empire after World War one, the


remnants of the former empire were divided up among the victorious allied powers,


even the Turkish speaking region were to come under the mandate of foreign


administration. In fact, much of Anatolia was already occupied by Greek or


Armenian forces. On August 10, 1920, Turkey and the allied powers signed the


treaty of Sevres. This treaty allowed for the creation of an independent


Kurdish and Armenian state on the remittance of the former Ottoman empire. This


treaty was to become null and void. Around the same time the Serves treaty was


being discussed, Mustafa Kemal gained power of what remained of the military and


political infrastructure in Anatolia. Kemal, starting in the Kurdish region and


proclaiming the unity of Turks and Kurds, organized resistance to the Armenian


and Georgian forces in eastern Anatolia. These forces were defeated by almost


entirely Kurdish armies, who thought they were fighting for a state where,


“Turks and Kurds would live as brothers and as equals (Kendal)” as stated by


Mustafa Kemal. However, after the defeat of the Greek armies in western Turkey,


Kemal declared to an assembly that “The state the we have just created is a


Turkish state (Kendal)” Immediately after, a strengthened Turkey renegotiated


the Treaty of Lausanne with the allies. With much more favorable terms for the


Turks, but no mention of the Kurds in the treaty. Thus the Kurds went from equal


partners to non-existent citizens in the new Turkish state. After the treaty of


Lousanne, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk proceeded to integrate the country and start a


process of Westernize the once orthodox Islamic empire. Kemal abolished the


Caliphate Arabic alphabet, and adopted the western Latin alphabet, thus


implementing some capitalistic measures in the name of a newly established


secular government. Mustafa Kemal enacted harsh laws on Islam in general. Kemal


made the Islamic call for prayer illegal and went as far as banning Islamists.


The most important of these decisions against Islam, was the outlawing all


Islamic holy houses of teaching. This was to have profound impacts on the


spreading of Islamic fundementalists within Turkey. This backfired against


Mustafa, by forcing Islam to go underground, the form of fundamentalism that


manifested in Turkey was much harsher then the ones that existed before being


banned by Kemal. Kemal trying to create a nation state , came upon a problem.


The new state of Turkey was a heterogeneous one, composed of multi-ethnical


groups, not a homogenous one of just pure ethnic Turks, as Mustafa Kemal


proclaimed. The capitalization on a new found Turkish nationalist movement


yielded a well tuned systematic campaign of obliterating the essence of the


Kurdish within the boundaries of newly formed Turkey. Kemal abolished all of the,


” Kurdish schools, associations, publications, religious fraternities, and


medressehs (McDowell).” The Kurdish nation represented such a threat to the


territorial integrity of Turkey that all people and names of places were


forcibly Turkicized by the government. This was to became referred to as ethnic


cleansing or genocide. Old archeological monuments and structure that proved the


ancient history of Kurdish people in Anatolia were systematically destroyed. The


words ‘Kurds’ and ‘Kurdistan’ were eradicated from all books and publications.


Anything that would lead to a separate identity of the Kurdish people were


eliminated in order yield the assimilation of the ethnically different Kurdish


nation. Even the Kurdish language was banned, a fact unparalleled in history! No


one in the state of Turkey was allowed to speak Kurdish, even though it was the


language of thirty percent of the people. All Kurdish students were feed


Turkish propaganda on the ethnic ancestry of the Kurdish people, they were


taught that Kurds, were a pure ‘Turkic race,’ whereas in actuality the Kurds are


ethnically Indo-Aryan, and the Turks are a mixture of Hun-Mongolian people. The


Turkish education minister proclaimed that, the Kurds had forgotten their


“Turkic” language in the fastness of the mountains of southeast Anatolia, thus


referring to them as, “Mountain Turks.(Gunter).” The racist spoon feed


propaganda of the Turkish educational institutions has reached to such a degree


of reducibility, that it is often taught in the schools of Turkey, all the great


Babylonian, Summerian, Egyptian, and Hittite civilizations had been created by


the Turks(Kendal). In order to hide the fact that the Kurds had lived in


Anatolia four thousand years before one Turk stepped in. The Turkish


intelligentsia determined the Kurds came from Central Asia five thousands years


ago. The situation deteriorated to the point where to state ” I am a Kurd ” was


a crime so serious as to warrant the death penalty under Turkey’s anti-terrorist


laws(Kendal). All past measures were not enough in the eyes of the Kemalist


government to destroy the remnants of five thousand years of Kurdish presence in


Anatolia. After these and more repressive measures were taken out, the


substantial Kurdish population began to revolt from the pressures unfairly


exerted on them by the oppressive and violence prone state of Turkey. The early


revolts were unorganized, lacked money, and poorly supplied. They lasted, on and


off, a little over thirteen yea

rs. The retribution of the Turkish army was so


extreme, they almost destroyed, looted, and burned the entire eastern portion of


the country. Whole villages were either deported to Western Turkey to be


assimilated or, if the government knew that the particular tribe or village were


not going to be assimilated that easily, they just simply massacred them. much


like the Nazi massacre of Jewish civilians(Morris). Throughout these uncivilized


methods of cruelty instituted by the Turkish governmental establishment, the


savage Turkish government managed to massacre or deport one million, five


hundred thousand Kurdish civilians (Kendal). The repression was so haneous that


the entire Eastern section of the state of Turkey was prohibited to all


foreigners and under martial law for almost thirty years, so as not to disciple


to the west. In contrast to Western Turkey, the whole of Eastern Turkey was made


into a military camp, and it has remained that way until today. The Turkish


minister of justice made the relationship of Turks and Kurds clear:


I believe that the Turk must be the only lord, the only master of this country.


Those who are not of pure Turkish stock (Kurds and Armenians) can have only one


right in this country, the right to be servants and slaves (McDowell).


After Kemal’s death, more successive and liberal minded regimes came to power.


The 1960 coup by the army attempted to Turkicize the whole of the Kurdish region.


Every single street, river, mountain, village, or city was given Turkish name to


the very last detail. What little hope the Kurdish population had in the hope


more or less disappears as the coup never really brought out fundamental change


for the Kurdish people. The rights of the Kurds were still non-existent, the


Kurdish language denied to them, and their culture still prohibited. The


successive coups of 1971 and 1980 always tended to bring Kurdish freedom and


self-expression to a halt. To justify a coup, the army would state that there


was a planned Kurdish uprising. Nevertheless, throughout the 1960s and 1970s,


Kurdish nationalism did emanate in the form of small underground publications


and newspapers, but they were always instantaneously banned and the editors


immediately apprehended and given lengthy jail terms. Throughout all the


repression, the Kurds were able to participate in political life, although under


forced Turkish identities(Gunter). Today the foreign minister of Turkey, Ardal


Inunu, is a Kurd; as well as his father the late president Ismat Inunu, former


presidents Fahrey Koruturk, and Cevdet Sunany, even the late president Turgut


Ozal claimed Kurdish heritage(Gunter). The mother of all ironies, is that two


people who made the bases of Turkish nationalism were Kurds, Ziya Gokalp and


Ismet Inunu, who were born in the Kurdish cities of Diarbekr(Kendal). The amount


of Kurdish people successfully assimilated into main stream Turkish society is


so infinitesimal that over ninety-one percent of the Kurdish population doesn’t


even speak one word of Turkish(Kendal). Reporter, who have only recently been


allowed to enter Eastern Turkey, are amazed at how, in this integral portion of


Turkey no one speaks a word of Turkish.


During the uneasy times of the 1970s many left-wing pro-Kurdish groups


manifested sporadically throughout the Turkish state. The 1980 coup put an end


to many of these organizations and political parties. After the brutal policies


of the military junta that took control of Turkey, may Kurds were put in prison


and executed for “separatism” which would mean anything from guerrilla warfare


to simply speaking Kurdish in public. During those times of extremism, even by


Turkish standards, a group of socialist-Kurdish youth began to organize and


formed a political party. Their simple selfless goal was to obtain the God given


right of self-determination for the worthy Kurdish nation, which included out-


right independence from the Turkish mainstream government. The main leader for


this independence movement was a young political science student from the


Kurdish city of Urfa, named Abdullah Ocalan or Apo (Kurdish for Uncle). This


group of organizers were Marxist-Lenninst in ideology and adamantly stated that


the Kurds and Turks were separate people and hence forth, the Turkish military


force present in Kurdistan was a belligerent action of occupation of Kurdistan.


The P.K.K (Party Kereykarey Kurdistan or Kurdistan Workers Party) also called


for the abolishment of tribalism, feudalism, and the “slave-like dependence of


women.” A great amount of the P.K.K military force were female. The P.K.K also


believed the only way to attain freedom and independence were through violence,


much like the American and French revolution of mid 1700s.


To conceive the P.K.K as completely leftist is untrue, they have adapted the


Communist theme of ideology to counter-weight the Turkish entity as a NATO state,


so it is safe to assume that the P.K.K has chosen the Marxist path by default.


Similar to the American fore-fathers choosing a republic form of government to


resist the British form of government, and France choosing a parliamentary form


of government to overshadow the history of monarchical reign of France. This


might seem to be absurd, but not when you see a “democratic” Turkey that


espouses a contradictory nationalism and places signs everywhere in Kurdistan


that says, ” Proud is He who calls oneself a TURK” or ” A TURK is worth the


whole universe(Kendal).” So accordingly, underneath all the ideology and


propaganda of the Cold War, what you essentially have is two combating


nationalisms.


The 1980 coup mentioned earlier pretty much halted all of P.K.K’s political


activities and other similar left-wing organizations. But the P.K.K’s political


politburo immediately regrouped in Syria and Lebanon. With help from some


neighboring countries, the P.K.K was able to launch small raids into Turkey in


1984. After the attacks grew in strength and number, the Turkish government


became seriously alarmed. The P.K.K was as violent as it advertised, many times


killing Kurds collaborating with the Turkish government. This didn’t raise their


popularity with the local populous. But, one thing they did accomplish was that


no other party or group in Turkey ever did, was the recognition of a Kurdish


problem in Turkey and a recognition of a Kurdish people in Turkey (Gunter). Thus,


the Kurdish situation was brought out to the international arena for the whole


world to witness the ever dynamic predicament in Northern Kurdistan. The Kurds


went from “Mountain Turks” to a “Kurdish reality in Turkey.” The Turkish army


then extended martial law to thirteen provinces in Eastern Turkey. The Turkish


army chief of staff admitted that “condition of war…exists in southeast


Turkey(Smyth).”


The P.K.K then began to adopt a less hostile attitude towards the civilian


population, realizing they can not operate without the help of the people. While


the P.K.K ceased to attack civilians, the Turkish army’s attitude towards


Kurdish civilians took an even harsher tone. What happened in the days of


Attaturk, were being implemented once again. It was like the situation was


dorment for forty-five years, and once again it came back to live. Amnesty


intentional reported the wholesale arrest and torture of Kurds in all parts of


Turkey. The entire village of Sirnak, population 25,000, was demolished and it’s


inhabitants forced to flee(Pilger). In all the Turkish army has destroyed an


estimated 1,700 Kurdish villages and towns(Montalbano). The P.K.K has


successfully begun to infiltrate larger cities and organizing merchant strikes


and mass protest against the Turkish government. The Turkish army and secret


police reacted by covert assassinations and “death squads” that killed anyone


that was even remotely linked to the P.K.K. These death squads have even killed


journalists who have reported the Turkish atrocities in Northern Kurdistan.


Turkey has the highest death rate for journalists in the world, even exceeding


Bosnia and Tadjikistan. Many pro-Kurdish politicians and human rights activists


have been killed, causing mass protest from the Kurdish population, even the


protest control police open fire on unarmed civilian protesters, killing


hundreds of men, women, seniors, and children indiscrimenantly(Kendal). The


state sanctioned DEP (People’s Democratic Party), a legal political entity was


forcibly closed down after their top political representatives were mysteriously


assassinated, their newspaper affiliates (Ozgur Daily) bombed, and it’s


parliamentarians arrested. All of these went against the established Turkish


constitutional laws. The lifting of Parliamentary immunity is a direct violation,


but when it comes to using illegal laws against Kurdish civilians there are no


limits.


Needless to say, the brutal and genocidal acts of the Turkish government have


only fanned the flare of the Kurdish drive for independence. In some parts of


Turkey, over ninety percent of the people support the P.K.K(Marks). When the


people see the government burning their houses, farms, and family members how


can one really support the establishment? How can the people believe the


government when they have publicly broken parliamentary laws by arresting


Kurdish parliamentary members for speaking Kurdish? The people has two choices,


the foreign occupiers or their sons, brothers, daughters, sisters, or fathers.


In response to the “ethnic cleansing” and martial law, the Turkish government


has also stationed over 450,000 troops in the area, backed by US made modern


tanks, Apache helicopters, Super Cobra helicopters, F-16 fighter jets, and


50,000 elite contra-rebels in the Kurdish region. Many generals in the armed


forces have openly talked about using chemical weapons on the Kurds (Turkey used


chemical weapons on the Kurds in the 1930s, British used it in the 1920s, and


Saddam Hussien used it in 1988)(Kendal).


Turkey has went as far as raiding Iraqi Kurdistan with the air planes given to


them by the US. As recently as March 20, 1995, Turkey invaded Iraqi Kurdistan.


They said the invation was to search for and destroy the P.K.K, but in actuality


the army couldn’t fight the P.K.K. The 35,000 invading force did little more


then destroying civilian villages, killing civilian Kurds, and ruining farm


crops. UNHCR (United Nations Higher Commission for Refugees) reported that


10,000 Turkish Kurds, who escaped Turkey’s systematic burning and destroying


Kurdish villages were forcibly detained and forced to return to Turkey. The


whereabouts of the refugees are unknown; knowning the Turkish track record,


their hopes are dismal.


Abdullah Ocalan


It now appears that the P.K.K has ascertained itself as the voice of the Kurdish


people, after seventy years of unrelenting oppression. The P.K.K’s unequivical


insistence of independence is rebuffed by Ankara, who state that everyone in


Turkey is equal and there are no room for minorities in Turkey. The army, an


organization who operates independently from the political wing of Turkey, will


not even placate a hint of even a form of diminutive local autonomy for the


Kurdish people. The P.K.K is exhibiting, and for their part proving to the


Kurdish masses that their violent way is the only avenue for any form of Kurdish


independence. Since the creation of the irredentent Turkish state the Kurds have


not received anything more then a tombstone with a forced Turkish surname. The


P.K.K has given 15,000 martyrs in the span of eleven years (Marcus), the army


has massacred more then 1,500,000 in the span of sixty years , more the 1,500


villages destroyed, every form of Kurdish identity denied, and their politicians


and journalists killed by secret police. After all it is the US constitution


that has written:


” When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to


dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to


assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which


the laws of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of


mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the


separation…..whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these


ends, it is the right of the people to alter it, or to abolish it, and to


institute a new government..”


It is the very example the United States has set, that the Kurdish people


wants to declare their independence. For, the only thing different between the


Kurdish revolution and the U.S one, is only two hundred and nine years. All


oppressions are bad, all occupations are wrong, every nation has the right to


decide their own fate.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Turkish Occupation Of Northern Kurdistan Essay Research

Слов:4409
Символов:30125
Размер:58.84 Кб.