РефератыИностранный языкMaMacbeth Irony Essay Research Paper There can

Macbeth Irony Essay Research Paper There can

Macbeth Irony Essay, Research Paper


There can be no argument that William Shakespeare’s genius and gift of poetic


writing is present in Macbeth. In addition, Shakespeare makes use of many


outside sources for his work, pulling from political and historical events.


Nearly all of Macbeth has a basis in historical fact. Holinshed chronicled in


the sixteenth century the histories of England, Scotland, and Ireland. It is


from the Historie of Scotland that Shakespeare builds the significance of this


popular tragedy. The historical record contains the belief of Macbeth in the


prophecies of three weird sisters, soothsayers who reinforce his ambitions for


the throne; records Banquo’s role; presents the subsequent murder of King


Duncan; and reveals Macbeth’s paranoia concerning Macduff. The play weaves these


separate histories into a coherent whole. Macbeth is the story of a man whose


ambitions have brought him to commit treason and murder. There is irony and


symbolism in the play, which contribute to the acceptance of this masterpiece.


Three forms of irony are evident in Macbeth: dramatic irony, being the


difference between what the audience sees and what the characters believe to be


true; verbal irony, the difference between what is said and what is meant; and


situational irony, the difference between what actually happens and what is


expected. A theatergoer witnessing a performance of Macbeth may develop


presumptions about what is actually true and what is actually a truth. When it


is contrary to what the character in the play believes to be true, a dramatic


irony occurs. This is evident when Lennox asks Macbeth whether the king is to


leave Macbeth’s castle for home: 1 Len. Goes the king hence to-day? Macb. He


does; he did appoint so. (Macbeth. II, iii, 54-55) Obviously, Macbeth is


consciously lying, for the audience is fully aware of his plans to murder King


Duncan that night. With Macbeth’s reply interpreted literally, the viewer is


convinced Duncan does intend to leave the castle the next day. Therein lies the


truth. Looking back at the opening of this scene, hidden truths of the porter


are exposed: Port. Knock, knock! Who’s there, in th’ other devil’s name? Faith,


here’s an equivocator, that could swear in both the scales against either scale,


who committed treason enough for God’s sake, yet could not equivocate to heaven.


O, come in, equivocator. (Macbeth. II. iii. 7-11) Macbeth is playing the part of


the equivocator again, equivocation being a form of double talk in which a


remark considered true could be argued as truth from one viewpoint. One


significant example of dramatic irony is again evident in the porter scene in


Act II, scene iii, because of the masked reality the stuporous drunk reveals.


The porter plays the part of porter at Hell-Gate in lines 1-3: Port. If a man


were porter at Hell-Gate, he should have old turning the key. He continues to


dramatize through line 16: Port. But this place is too cold for hell. I’ll


devil-porter it no further. With the king’s murder discovered, it is nearly


comedic when Lady Macbeth responds to the announcement of King Duncan’s murder.


She first enters in mock confusion, questioning: Lady M. What’s the business,


That such a hideous trumpet calls to parley The sleepers of the house? Speak,


speak! (Macbeth. II, iii, 81-83) This scene could be directed in such a way to


have the actor portraying Lady Macbeth embellish her performance to the point of


dramatically emoting. Then, upon hearing Macduff refuse to tell her what has


happened for "The repetition in a woman’s ear/Would murder as it fell"


(Macbeth. II, iii, 85-86) the viewer cannot help ignoring the serious tone of


the scene and laughing at the irony in his choice of words. The lady then plays


her innocence once more by replying in alarm to Macduff’s telling Banquo of the


murder: Lady M. Woe, alas! What in our house? (Macbeth. II, iii, 86-87) The most


enjoyable form of irony in this play is verbal. Verbal irony is specifically


when a person says that which is contrary to fact in order to make a point


rather than to deceive. Sarcasm is one type of verbal irony. However, there are


many. On the exit of Macbeth’s final visit to the weird siste

rs, the first witch


wryly comments on Macbeth’s forgetting to thank them: 1. Witch. That this great


king may kindly say Our duties did his welcome pay. (Macbeth. IV, I, 131-132)


Verbal irony is also present in Lennox’s speech as he ponders what has strangely


unfolded since the banquet: Len. And the right valiant Banquo walk’d too late,


Whom you may say (if’t please you) Fleance kill’d, For Fleance fled. (Macbeth.


III, vi, 5-7) The irony in the line Lennox delivers is perfectly complete by the


inclusion of an almost humorous use of alliteration at its end. It should be


noted that the strongest representation of verbal irony occurs in the scene


involving the three witches, Macbeth, and Banquo. Banquo nearly begs the witches


for a prophetic glance into his own future and their response is revealed in a


three-fold irony: 1. Witch. Lesser than Macbeth, and greater. 2. Witch. Not so


happy, yet much happier. 3. Witch. Thou shalt get kings, though thou be none. (Macbeth.


I. iii. 65-68) Often times among soothsayers, prophets, and seers there lays an


element of vagueness and double-talk. The witches are without exception in their


scenes. Aside from dramatic and verbal forms of irony, situational irony is


present in William Shakespeare’s Macbeth. There is the mysterious appearance of


a third murderer in Act III, scene iii. This occurrence is not unusual when


considering Shakespeare’s use of the symbolic number "three"


throughout the play. The strongest evidence of situational irony is unmistakably


the way in which the strange sisters’ prophecies unfold. Macbeth is given the


illusion of immortality when the second apparition tells him that he will not


fall to harm. This illusion is amplified with the third apparition’s promise: 3.


App. Macbeth shall never vanquish’d be until Great Birnan wood to high Dunsinane


hill Shall come against him. (Macbeth. IV, I, 92-94) Shakespeare, in this case,


is not only surprising the characters with the outcome of these prophesies, but


also the audience. Macbeth believes he is to be victorious, but the audience


knows his failure will be inevitable. However, the viewers are oblivious of the


outcome. The cumulative irony is that of the weird sisters telling Macbeth


exactly what he wishes to hear. All his ambitions reinforced by this universal


trick of soothsayers, strongly predispose the listener toward total belief.


Macbeth’s belief leads to his invulnerability, resulting in ultimate irony. It


is important to look at the varying levels of irony within William Shakespeare’s


masterpiece, Macbeth. The evidence of that irony is incontrovertible. What


characters in the play believe and theatergoers see to be true is the result of


dramatic irony. When characters in the play deliver lines with double meanings


this is irony presented verbally. With situational irony, what actually happens


and what is expected to happen results in the desired effect. While expanding


upon the irony of Macbeth, an obvious symbolism is clearly presented. On the


irony and symbolism of the play, alone, entire volumes of essays are


constructed. Internet web sites, Cliffs and Monarch Notes, and the public


library offer reliable sources to further information on the interpretation of


Shakespeare’s work. Shakespeare is, if nothing else, a moralist. His work


contains lessons in morality to be reviewed and noted. In Macbeth, it is lust


for power leading to destruction. Many contemporary examples of this are evident


in world dictators, military juntas, and corporate criminals. Macbeth has


contemporary significance. In the mirror of Shakespeare, the human condition is


an honest reflection of vulnerability.


Bradley, A.C. (1912) Shakespearean Tragedy. Pp. 468-469 Evans, Tobin, eds.


(1997) The Riverside Shakespeare. (2nd ed.) Macbeth. Boston. New York. Houghton


Mifflin Company. Holinshed, R. (1587) Historie of Scotland. (2nd ed.) Chronicles


of England, Scotland, and Ireland. 1587. Paul, Henry N. (1950) The Royal Play of


Macbeth. Pp. 213-217 Shakespeare’s Macbeth. Total Study Edition. (1990) Coles


Editorial Board. Shakespeare Web. Queries from genuinely interested students.


Internet. Online. The Tragedy of Macbeth New Haven. Yale University Press. 1954.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Macbeth Irony Essay Research Paper There can

Слов:1472
Символов:9954
Размер:19.44 Кб.