РефератыИностранный языкDoDo We Really Love Our Animals Essay

Do We Really Love Our Animals Essay

Do We Really Love Our Animals? Essay, Research Paper


Do you consider yourself a pet lover? Do


you love animals in general? Can you imagine yourself as a little boy in


a trailer far away from the depths of socialization? Once upon a time there


was this boy, and this boy had a friend. No matter how hard times got he


had Bo. The boy was incredibly happy because he had always dreamed of having


a dog like that, a companion. Then your friend dies and you are left standing.


Can you imagine the pain?


Nobody likes to lose a good friend or a


pet, and the majority of the population loves animals. However, evidence


points that people don?t like animals as much as they claim to because


the majority of the population tends to over look the genocide that exists


this very instance. Gandhi once wrote, “The greatness of a nation and its


moral progress can be judged by the ways its animals are treated”(Why Vegan?


1) Gandhi brings up a good point because the issue of Animal Rights is


in fact an issue of one?s moral code. To define the morality and ethics,


this paper will refer to Ayn Rand?s definition taken from the book, The


Virtue of Selfishness. Rand describes itthis way, “It is a code of values


to guide a man?s choices and actions that determine the purpose of his


life” (Rand 13). Can the common animal lover really love animals that much


and is it in their moral code to protect the living? Maybe they would if


they were presented with the facts about vivisection and the meat industry.


The truth of the matter is, people don?t love animals as much as they claim


to, because they allow mistreatment, support companies that practice Vivisection,


and the majority of the population still eats meat.


The first form of oppression comes from


probably one of the most grotesquely cruel practices of all. Did you know


that from buying your toothpaste to buying your cosmetics, you open yourself


up for the opportunity to participate in the funding of Vivisection? PETA,


an international non profit organization designed to protect the rights


of animals has defined the term as, “Vivisection is the practice of experimenting


on live animals” (PETA 1). Let?s start with the large amount of animals


Vivisection effects. The American Anti-Vivisection Society reports that,


“Between 25 and 50 million animals are killed in American Laboratories


each Year”(www.aavs.org/Doc). Animal?s such as mice, rabbits, guinea pigs,


ferrets, cats, dogs, primates, sheep, cows, and pigs are subjected to the


effects of Vivisection. The tests are conducted by government agencies,


corporations, hospitals, the military, and chemical companies. The single


largest financier and advocate of vivisection would have to be The National


Institutes of Health(NIH). The saddest part about this is that we as taxpayers


are paying for the inhumane and cruel treatment of animals. Every time


we pay our taxes we are supporting Vivisection. The American Anti-vivisection


Society states that, “These animals can be subjected to a mydraid of painful


procedures. They are burned, starved, irradiated, shocked, mutilated, kept


in isolation, poisoned, drugged, electrocuted, and the list goes on and


on”(www.aavs.org/Docs/). The tests range from a monkey?s eyes being sewn


shut for long periods of times, to a dog?s eyes getting burned by radiation,


and even so far as to subject fully conscience cats and dogs to surgery


with no anesthetic. When they are done, if they survive they are then reused


for more tests. Often times, animals such as dogs and cats are silenced


through a grotesque procedure. This process which consists of cutting the


animals vocal chords to silence the specimen. The most common type of test


used by corporations is the Draize test. The Draize test is used for testing


the safety of the corporation?s product. Sidney Gidens put it best in his


essay entitled “The Use of Animals in Science”, where Gidens says “Named


after it?s inventor, John Draize, who developed the method in 1944. The


test consists of placing rabbits in stocks that immobilize their heads


and then dropping the substance to be tested into one eye, using the other


eye as a controller”(Regan 199). These tests are often conducted over elongated


periods of time, and usually the fate of the animal is blindness, sometimes


death, and always pain. Rabbits are the most commonly used animal involved


in Draize testing because their tear ducts are too inefficient to dilute


the harmful substances being drained into their eyes.


One of the most common arguments for Vivisection


would have to be the scientific fable of the impression of helping mankind.


This point is not valid, for the fact that computers and technology have


revolutionized the field. Often times the researchers have no central data


base to store information that is not even needed so the tests are continued


over and over again. PETA states, “Computer modeling shows great promise


for testing human responses to various stimuli, and many drug and cosmetics


companies already use artificial skin to gauge the biological responses


of human skin to their products”(PETA 2). Since there are no efficient


databases to hold information gathered from these tests, it therefore must


be repeated, and this costs money as well as the lives of millions of innocent


animals. They have the capability to feel just we humans do, and we as


humans should strive to be humane. When you take a baby cow from its mother,that


mother cow is going to morn and feel sad. Even worse, if you were to perform


live surgery on that animal and drip poison into eyes all day ,well then


that animal is going to feel pain. The truth is that Vivisection wastes


money and lives that could otherwise be spared.


“The average American consumes 120 pounds


of beef each year. Our carnivorous needs must also be condoned. To meet


this enormous demand, Western Civilization has developed the ultimate killing


machine to feed the hungry masses. It?s called the slaughter-house”(Faces


of Death). I have seen a cow?s head placed inside a metal face cage. After


the cage is locked the cows throat is then cut and the animal is left to


bleed to death. This method is known as Koshering. It only makes up a small


percent of the killing of animals because it is not in high demand. The


process requires that the animal bleeds to death as a cleansing process.


“The cow chokes on his own blood. I could only feel pity” (Faces of Death).


This institutionalized form of cruelty


is also known as Factory Farming and is fueled by America?s fast food culture.


Other supporters of the consumption of meat are religion, culture, and


history. Animal agriculture is commonly being replaced by corporate farming.


“More than 90% of farmed animals in the US are raised in these intensive


confinement systems. The intensive systems are promoted and defended as


necessary for the production of low-cost meat”(Why Vegan? 2). To receive


a greater total in net production, animals are often overcrowded to the


point where the animals die. Take a look in the agriculture magazine NATIONAL


HOG FARMER. In the November 93 edition there is an article entitled “Overcrowding


Pigs Pay”. This title alone tells you how the economics involved in this


form of death, obviously out weighs the compassion one might otherwise


possess. Dr. Bernard Rollin states that is, “more economically efficient


to put a greater number of birds into each cage, accepting lower productivity


per bird but greater productivity per cage…individual animals produce,


for example gain weight, in part because they are immobile, yet suffer


because of the inability to move…Chicken

s are cheap, cages are expensive”(Why


Vegan? 2) Animals are usually locked up in buildings with no windows crowed


with hundreds to tens of thousands of other animals. They are also subject


to extreme weather conditions, such as extreme heat and extreme cold. Animals


have been genetically mutated to become higher yielding products. These


murders use methods like gene splicing, and selective breeding. There are


also hormones administrated as well as unnatural feeding schedules. It


is truly repugnant to think of the effects of genetic mutation on animals.


I have seen cows with breasts unnaturally huge to carry more milk. “Unnaturally


large amounts of flesh cause the animal to suffer joint inflammation and


pain that is aggravated by the concrete, slatted metal, or wire mesh floors”(Why


Vegan? 2). If that?s not enough animals are harmed a number of other ways


in slaughterhouses. Like castration, which involves cutting the animals


testicles off with a knife, with no anesthetic for economic purposes. Not


to mention the number of times a cow is branded with third degree burns.


The methods of death are largely abundant,


in fact so that one could write a book and call it the “101 Ways Animals


Die in the Slaughterhouse”. If animals don?t die from disease first, then


they have to first be transported to a corporate farm. The transportation


process is like the slave-ships from Africa, in the fact that for economical


reasons the animals are overcrowded and left to live in each other?s excrement.


There are diseases such as shipping fever that often take the lives of


many animals involved in the transportation process. The weather can be


a largely overlooked method of death for these innocent animals. “Because


chickens lose feathers in rough living conditions, transport in freezing


weather results in frozen body parts, causing severe pain”(Why Vegan? 5).


Many animals are frozen in place by their own manure. The trauma inflicted


from such joyrides to the slaughterhouse have produced “downers”. Downers


are animals that are too weak and sick to function. Even when electrocuted


and beaten, the animal refuses to go on. “Approximately 350,000 dairy cows


are downers each year”(Why Vegan? 5) Animals that are downers are often


beaten and dragged by chains still alive to the “deadpile”. Another form


of death comes from a practice called captive bolt head stunning. A device


that resembles somewhat of a pistol is aimed at the animal?s head. A metal


rod is shot into the brain, often times missing the point of unconsciousness


and therefore must be repeated. Remember that shooting a struggling animal


can be difficult and require a sufficient amount of practice. Next we come


to Electric head stunning, when an electric stunner is used to give the


animal a seizure. After the animal is shocked where it is often not unconsciousness


and still susceptible to feeling pain, the animals throat is cut. Animals


can regain consciousness after a second. Some animals even undergo the


skinning process still alive. Farming has become the number one threat


to our nation?s animals.


Some common arguments for the beef industry


would be the all classic, meat is good for you. It is supposed to contain


vitamins and minerals that are not otherwise found. However, this argument


is not true, it is a fact that vegetarians and vegans have a far healthier


diet than a meat eater. Michael Klaper, MD has stated that, “The human


body has no more need for cow?s milk than it does for dog?s milk, horses?


milk, or giraffes? milk”(Why Vegan? 9). In fact plant foods have been known


to protect the body from cancer. Animal foods like meat, can raise the


risk for cancer because of the compounds found in it. Vegetarians don?t


have to worry about heart disease associated with saturated fat from red


meat. Another common argument is that it has been going on forever, since


primitive man.


Are we not intelligent and rational beings,


aren?t we no longer primitive? What if the slaughter house had glass walls


and was connected to your favorite restaurant. Would you want to pick the


animal of your choice and then watch it be murdered? Would that hamburger


taste as good? “Slaughterhouses should be in restaurants and grocery stores.


They should have a glass wall so that people must see the animal they choose.


Look into that animals eyes and say , “OK, slit his throat” (Why Vegan?


5). Are these animals ours to enslave and murder, or are they God?s creatures?


It all boils down to oppressive power structures


and the way that they are designed. Oppressive power structures are institutions


of thought created to oppress the weaker race, ethnicity, gender, and species.


The struggle for Animal Rights and the issues involved are no different


than the struggle for women?s rights. They are both used as biological


machines, one confined to a life of reproduction and domesticity, and the


other confined to life of torture and death. People, often times, argue


that humans are smarter than animals so it doesn?t matter. If we are so


smart , than can?t we realize that Vivisection and the Meat industry are


wrong? If you enslave and mistreat your animal you?re probably going to


do the same thing to your child. It all comes back to morals. Speciesism


is the belief that our society is the only one worthy of ethical consideration.


This promotes the idea that those who are weaker and indifferent are to


be exploited because we can do so. “All arguments to prove man?s superiority


cannot shatter this hard fact: in suffering, the animals are our equals”(Why


Vegan? 14). If we allow humans to live, then why not animals?


There are a number of things one can do


to help fight against the atrocities discussed in this paper. The first


and most crucial thing that should be done is going Vegetarian. Which is


the process of not eating meat, for more information you can check out


this veggie page, http://www.veg.org/veg/. Then there is the practice of


Veganism which is the denial of all animal byproducts like milk, eggs,


etc. For more information of Veganism one could consult the informative


website located at, www.veganoutreach.org/. Another thing to do would be


to check out PETA, by writing to them at People For The Ethical Treatment


of Animals, P.O. Box 42516, Washington, DC 20015. You can also check out


the American Anti-Vivisection Society web page at http://www.aavs.org.


For a list of animal safe products one can consult this informative website,


www.allforanimals/cruelfree.html. Without participating in the movement


for Animal Rights can we really call ourselves animal lovers? When you


consume animal products with the information given in this text can you


really say that you love your animals?


This paper was written in loving memory


of my dog BoBo, and is dedicated to the billions dead and to the progress


of the Animal Rights movement as a whole. With the facts presented in this


paper it can only be said that we as Americans obviously don?t love animals


as much as we claim too.


Works Cited


1. American Anit-Vivisection Society.


Home page. 17, Mar.2000 http://www.aavs.org/


2. Faces of Death. Writer. Alan Black.


Dir. Conan Lecilare. Nar. Dr. Francis B. Gross Gorgon Video, 1990. 105


min.


3. People For the Ethical Treatment of


Animals Animal Experiments. Washigton, DC.1-2


4. Rand, Ayn The Virtue of Selfisness.


USA: Penguin Books, 1964. 1.


5. Regan, Tom and Singer,Peter Animal


Rights and Human Obligations. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1989


6. Vegan Outreach Why Vegan? Pittsburgh:


1999

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Do We Really Love Our Animals Essay

Слов:2742
Символов:18181
Размер:35.51 Кб.