РефератыИностранный языкThThe Effects Of The Reforms Of Constantin

The Effects Of The Reforms Of Constantin

Essay, Research Paper


Constantine I was perhaps most well known for being the first Christian emperor of the


Roman Empire. His instigation of the conversion of the entire Roman Empire from paganism to


Christianity also ensured him recognition in history. For all intents and purposes, Constantine was


the single ruler of the Roman Empire from 324 to 337 AD. His reign was perhaps the most


distinctive out of all of Rome?s emperors, insofar as having an impact on the course of the future


of Europe, and ultimately, the greater part of the earth, for he implemented changes that remain to


this day. The resulting alteration of the nature of the Empire had direct ramifications on the


cultures with which it dealt, and those which spurred from its collapse, lasting even today.


Constantine I was the son of Constantius Chlorus and Helena, and was born on February


27, of either 272 or 273 AD. in Serbia. Upon his father becoming Caesar in 293 AD.,


Constantine was sent as a hostage to Emperor Galerius, to ensure Constantius? own appropriate


behaviour. Constantine later returned to his father?s side when Constantius was on his deathbed,


in Britain in 306 AD. The period after his father?s death in 306 AD., until the ultimate defeat of


his enemies in 324 AD., saw Constantine attempting to rule Rome while it was in a state of civil


war. These two sets of military campaigns against him resulted in Constantine eventually


becoming the sole ruler of the Empire.


Prior to Constantine?s rise to the throne, the Roman Empire was in a state of decline. A


multitude of forces on the Empire?s eastern front, as well as barbarian uprisings in the north were


putting a strain on the Rome externally, while at the same time, the division of rule weakened it


on the domestic front. Paganism was seen as a vital part of the Roman culture, as well as a


uniting force offering a strong sense of patriotism. This aspect of the Roman lifestyle however


was being threatened by the growing support for Christianity, which had been gaining momentum


over the preceding two hundred years, despite persecution and mistrust at the hands of the Roman


people and government.


Under the Emperor Diocletian, who ruled from 284 to his abdication in 305 AD., the


Christian minority suffered its most severe persecution. Seen as a threat to the crown as well as to


the Roman way of life, they faced oppression at every turn at the hands of the pagans, sanctioned


by the government of Diocletian. This however did not seem to put an end to the expansion of


Christianity. As a result, the Romans reached the point that they could no longer ignore the


?problem? of Christianity. So far as the Romans were concerned, the matter of religion was


governmental, and the government held the responsibility of ensuring that Rome retained favour


in the eyes of the gods. In the Christian philosophy however, God was seen as separate from, and


a higher priority than, the state.


As a result, the Romans saw the Christians as a threat to their way of life, and believed


that the only way to preserve it was through the persecution of them. The Christians, on the other


hand, only wished to seek relief from the persecution they were suffering at the hands of their


oppressors. Clearly, some change to the existing order would have to occur for the two to exist


together in relative harmony. Upon the abdication of Diocletian in 305 AD., it was apparent that


his successor would be forced to deal with the pressing problem of the two conflicting religions.


After the defeat of his rivals in several military campaigns, Constantine did just that. In 312 AD.,


Constantine?s forces fought and defeated the forces of Maxentius. Later, in 314, 316, and 324


AD., Constantine repeatedly defeated his other enemy Licinius. After the final defeat of Licinius in


324 AD., Constantine became the sole imperator of the Roman Empire.


It was during the first of these campaigns that Constantine openly asserted his Christian


beliefs, crediting Jesus Christ for his victory over Maxentius, at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge.


The motives behind the conversion of Constantine remain a topic of debate. Legend states that


Constantine claimed that he had seen the sign of Christ in the sky outside of Rome, and believed


that it was as a result of this experience that he was able to defeat his rival. It is also as a


possibility that Constantine chose to embrace Christianity as a simple demonstration of his


opposition to Maxentius, who held very deep pagan convictions. ?If it was merely experimenting


with the cross of Jesus, the experiment brought convincing belief, for the sacred emblem was


employed in all later military campaigns, ? stated historian Alexander Flick about Constantine?s


conversion. In either scenario, after the Battle of the Milvian Bridge, Constantine was recognized


as a Christian by all.


The motives of Constantine would govern his policies towards the church throughout his


reign. While purely political incentives would result in Constantine exploiting the church to his


own end, purely religious convictions would see the church using the emperor as a puppet to its


own advantage. History shows that Constantine?s motives were of a mixed nature. As he had


received some Christian background in his upbringing, he held a sympathetic theological


perspective towards the religion. At the same time, he continued his father?s policies of religious


toleration. Thus it was not a complete change in character for Constantine to embrace


Christianity. However, the most probable factor in Constantine?s conversion to Christianity would


be that in his early military campaigns against his adversaries, the Christian God seemed to serve


him well. As a result, his faith increased each time God delivered him another victory over his


enemies.


In 313 AD., Constantine met with Licinius, and the two rulers drew up the Edict of Milan,


which effectively put an end to the era of Christian persecution by granting the Christians the


freedom to practice their religion without fear of government reprisal. Christians who had lost


their status and legal power in the past now had it reinstated. The Edict also recognized the


church as as a legitimate establishment, for it permitted the church to buy and hold land. It is not


surprising that for these reasons that the church welcomed the Edict of Milan. Its results were


described by Alexander Flick:


It did not make Christianity the state religion, as is generally asserted, but only


legalized it, and popularized it. Now the people could and did openly desert the


old and join the new faith… (The Edict) gave opportunity for public


organization, thus paving the way for the Catholic hierarchy already begun;


and marks as a new era in the history of the Christian church, because at last as


a great Roman Emperor and his conquering army had taken up the sword of


persecuted Christianity.


By passing the Edict, Constantine had started the process of making Christianity the


official religion of the Roman state rather than paganism This transition from paganism to


Christianity was accomplished by the passing of laws and other government legislation which


favoured this new-coming Roman religion over that of the old. Constantine began showing favour


towards Christianity as early as 312, however, he himself did not officially convert to the religion


until his baptism in 337 AD. Other decrees that showed favour to the Christians followed the


Edict. Gradually, the clergy became exempt from military and municipal duties ( a privilege


previously reserved for pagan priests and Jewish rabbis). Christian slaves were also emancipated.


In 316 AD., a multitude of customs and traditions the Christians found offensive were abolished,


and by 323, the former gods of the Roman Empire; Jupiter, Apollo, Mars, etc., were no longer


visible on state coinage. It is an interesting sidenote that most of the blatantly obvious pro-


Christian decrees executed by Constantine were not implemented until after the final defeat of


Licinius, in 324 AD., which placed Constantine in the position of sole ruler of the Roman


Empire.


The changes brought about by Constantine resulted in drastic and permanent effects to the


Roman state, as well as the Christian church. These shifts in the nature of these two


establishments had profound consequences on those citizens involved under each. With the


Christians, it meant public acceptance and an end to unrelenting persecution. With regards to the


>Romans, it meant a new way of life, so far as their spiritual community was concerned. In both


cases, the reforms to the Roman state subsequently resulted in a change in the nature of both


institutions.


The most obvious change implemented by Constantine was the conversion of the Roman


people from the spiritual life of paganism to Christianity. This change altered the nature of the


Christian society by bringing the Christian church and the Christian state closer together. As these


changes were occurring in the Christian culture, the result of Constantine?s reforms and continued


legislation preferring Christianity, there was as a large segment of the Roman population who


gradually found themselves identifying more and more with the Christians, rather than with their


pagan gods of old.


There were a great number of Roman citizens who remained ignorant of the reasons for


their states? theological conversion and were content to simply follow the emperor. All that was


required of these individuals to make this transition was simply the substitution of their old pagan


traditions and idols for the paraphernalia of their new religion of Christianity, and deluding


themselves that, for the time being, everything else was as it had been before. However, obeying


the law later meant that they would have to accept and pursue basic Christian morals. Roman civil


law promoted the basic values of Christianity, and the criminal law of the society became altered


to the point that the distinctions between theological ideas of sin and the actual consequences of


criminal wrong-doing became blurred. Though the Roman people may not have understood their


new religion, they were subject to it nonetheless.


The nature of the Roman state was further redirected by the increased allegiance of the


Christian church with the Roman people. This meant that the state began the process of losing its


previous overwhelming control over its citizenry. The implications of this shift in the control of


the masses meant that the government would now have to work through the church to ensure and


maintain the loyalty of the public. By the creation of the Christian state and the intertwining of


church and state, Constantine had, in a manner of speaking, put himself and those who would


follow him in the throne, at the mercy of the church. He was now dependant upon the support of


the church to ensure the support of the public. Constantine had now put himself under the control


of the church, rather than the reversal, which he had hoped to accomplish.


As as a result of the increase of the political power of the church, while it continued to


adhere to the Christian faith, the church began to lose its spiritual and theological integrity. This


was accomplished through the equation of Roman law with the law of the church, the state was


easily able to shape the theology of the average citizen. Thus, the nature of the church was


altered by the increased number of unconcerned and insincere converts to their religion. Through


this influx of confused and indifferent individuals, Constantine was able to regain some sort of


control over the Christian church. If the masses followed the doctrine as defined by the state, then


the effect of the church?s control over the minds of its congregation was largely eliminated.


There still remained as a great number of devout and educated Christians, clergy and


church elders. These individuals maintained a profound direct influence over Constantine and his


policies, as trusted advisors. Constantine relied on the support of these advisors in order to


maintain the support of the Christian public. At the same time the church found itself dependant


on the favour of Constantine, so as not to lose the favour of the government. Thus the two


separate institutions became interdependent on one another, for they would be rendered weak


without the other.


Constantine further changed the nature of the Roman Empire through the relocation of its


capital from Rome to Constantinople. Constantine realized that in order for the Empire to


successfully move from its pagan routes, it must have a pagan free centre. Thus, Constantine


made the decision to create the city of Constantinople on the site of Byzantium (this city would


also act as the capital of the Byzantine Empire that succeeded it). Constantine recognized


however, that for the new capital of the empire to function as effectively as Rome had, it would


have to be as a Christian version of the same:


Why even Constantine himself could not escape from this deep complex of


thought, and it was as a foregone conclusion that, when he made as a new


centre for the Empire in its new Christian form, that centre could only be as a


new ?Rome.? So when the Emperor founded his new ?city of Constantine,? in


all respects spiritual and material he copied the old Rome, in order to replace it


by the new.


Constantine had to preserve the old Empire in order to bring about a new one.


Ultimately, the conversion of the Roman state from a theology of paganism to Christianity


was necessary to ensure its survival. There can be little doubt that the Roman Empire, in its state


of decline, would not have been able to survive the growing expansion of Christianity within its


boundaries. Thus, it stands to reason that Constantine?s motives in transforming the spiritual


beliefs of the empire could have been just as politically driven as they were religiously. In either


scenario, Constantine?s reforms drastically altered the nature of the Roman Empire.


The Roman Empire changed from a state in which the voice of God was the government,


to a state where church and state cooperated solely to ensure its own continued existence. Prior


to Constantine and his reforms, the state and emperor were the embodiment of the will of the


gods. After the introduction of Christianity-favouring legislation, and the increased power wielded


by the Christian church, the emperor and church were forced into a situation of symbiosis. The


state was no longer in complete and undisputed control of its citizens, for the church had gained


the moral and spiritual allegiance of the people. Thus, the state had lost its complete control over


the people, and was now dependant on the favour of the church.


At the same time, Christian population found themselves in as a situation which they had


not experienced before; the freedom of their religion from the state sanctioned persecution. So far


as the Christian church was concerned, it had to ensure it retained the favour of the Roman


government, so that the legislation in its favour did not become repealed. The Roman people


(ultimately the members of the Christian church) also found themselves in a situation where the


Roman government was not in direct control over their spiritual lives. The government however,


had weakened the Christian church through the more or less ?forced? conversion of many


ignorant or unconfused citizens. Thus, the Christian church had also lost its control over the


people, and was equally dependant on the government.


It was in this manner that the nature of the Roman Empire was changed by the reforms


brought about by Constantine. The Christian church had now been accepted by the Roman


bureaucracy. The government had lost its absolute control over its people. Instead, there were


now two parallel, yet separate, institutions completely dependant upon each other to maintain


their own influence over the masses. These reforms remained in place in the Roman Empire until


its collapse, and the legacy of these reforms is still visible in the present day.


BIBLIOGRAPHY


Alfoldi, Andrew. The Conversion of Constantine and Pagan Rome. Oxford: Clarendon Press,


1948.


Barnes, Timothy D. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press,


1981.


Cochrane, Charles Norris. Christianity and Classical Culture. New York: Oxford University


Press, 1957


Flick, Alexander C. The Rise and Fall of the Mediaeval Church. New York: Burt Franklin, 1909.


Grant, Michael. Constantine the Great – The Man and His Times. New York: Macmillian


Publishing, 1993.


Starr, Chester G. A History of the Ancient World. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press,


1991.


The Affects


of the


Reforms of Constantine


on the


Nature of the Roman Empire


Chris Stone


ID. 97107692


Classics 1010R


Prof D. K. House


April 15th, 1998

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: The Effects Of The Reforms Of Constantin

Слов:2987
Символов:19727
Размер:38.53 Кб.