РефератыИностранный языкThThe Contenders Essay Research Paper For the

The Contenders Essay Research Paper For the

The Contenders Essay, Research Paper


For the presidential election of 1856, the Democrats nominated James


Buchanan and John Breckenridge, the newly formed Republican party nominated


John Fremont and William Drayton, the American [or Know-Nothing] party


nominated former president Millard Fillmore and Andrew Donelson, and the


Abolition Party nominated Gerrit Smith and Samuel McFarland.


Buchanan started his political career as a state representative in


Pennsylvania, was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1821,


appointed minister to Russia in 1832, and elected US Senator in 1834. He was


appointed Secretary of State in 1845 by President Polk


and in that capacity helped forge the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which


ended the Mexican War. He was appointed by President Polk as minister to


Great Britain in 1853. As such, he, along with the American ministers to


Spain and France, issued the Ostend Manifesto, which recommended the


annexation of Cuba to the United States. This endeared him to southerners,


who assumed Cuba would be a slave state.


He was one of several northerners supported over the years by southern


Democrats for being amenable to slaveholders’ interests, a situation


originating with Martin van Buren.


Buchanan’s two major rivals for the nomination, Franklin Pierce and


Stephen Douglas, were both politically tainted by the bloodshed in Kansas.


Buchanan was untainted, since he had been abroad during most of the


controversy. Even so, he did not secure the nomination until the seventeenth


ballot.


Fremont was best known as an explorer and a war hero. He surveyed the


land between the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers, explored the Oregon Trail


territories and crossed the Sierra Madres into the Sacramento Valley. As a


captain in the Army, he returned to California and helped the settlers


overthrow Mexican rule in what became known as the Bear Flag Revolution, a


sidebar to the Mexican War. He was elected as one of California’s first two


Senators.


The infant Republican party was born from the ashes of the Whig party,


which had suffered spontaneous combustion as a result of the slavery issue.


The party’s convention was a farce; only northern states and a few border


slave states sent delegates. Sticking to their Whig roots, they nominated a


war hero, albeit a minor one. William Drayton’s runner-up for the VP slot


was Abraham Lincoln.


Fillmore, having been the thirteenth president following the death of


Zachary Taylor, found himself representing the American party after many


northern delegates left the convention over a rift caused by the slavery


issue. Their objection was that the party platform was not strong enough


against the spread of slavery. The


party’s vice presidential nominee was a nephew of Andrew Jackson and the


editor of the Washington Union. The party, also known as the Know-Nothings,


was extremely antagonistic towards immigrants, Catholics and other assorted


minorities. The party was born in 1850, when several covert “Native


American” societies joined together, their secret password being “I know


nothing.”


Smith was nominated by the Abolition party in New York, which had


nominated Frederick Douglass for New York secretary of state the year before


under the label New York Liberty Party.


The Campaign: Neither Buchanan nor Fremont campaigned themselves.


Republicans declared Buchanan dead of lockjaw. Fremont, however, had a


splendid campaign substitute, his beautiful wife Jessie, prompting “Oh


Jessie!” campaign buttons. The Democrats tried desperately to avoid the


slavery issue altogether, opting instead to pursue the conservative effort


to preserve the Union. The Republicans, on the other hand, actively attacked


slavery. Their campaign slogan was “Free Soil, Free Men, Freedom, Fremont”.


[Shields-West, pgs 78 & 80]


The self-serving efforts of Stephen Douglas did more to mold the


campaign of 1856 than did any other single event. Although he did not


intentionally destroy the North-South balance created by the


Compromise of 1850, his focused quest for the White House caused him to make


some foolish choices. Douglas coveted a rail head in Chicago for the new


transcontinental railroad. This would make Chicago a major trade center for


the country, not unlike New York City when the Erie Canal was completed. He


knew increased economic power for his home state would translate as


increased political power for him. The South, on the other hand, wanted the


rail head located in St. Louis, or even New Orleans. In order to secure


southern support for his plan, Douglas chose to win them over by proposing


the Kansas-Nebraska Act, a bill that


would divide the Nebraska Territory into two separate territories, each


having popular sovereignty. This would amount to nullification of the


Missouri Compromise. Using the power of his new southern allies, Douglas


wheeled and dealed the Kansas-Nebraska Act through Congress.


By doing so, Douglas alienated his northern colleagues. The


anti-slavery movement had become a formidable force in northern politics.


Douglas mistakenly believed popular sovereignty had become more acceptable


to the general public than it actually had. In July of 1856, ‘Conscience


Whigs”, northern Democrats and Free Soilers met in Jackson, Michigan, to


form the Republican party for the specific


purpose of opposing slav

ery.


In the meantime, pro-slavery factions, many from across the Missouri


border, held a bogus election in the newly formed Kansas Territory, adopting


a pro-slavery constitution and electing a pro-slavery state government. When


anti-slavery citizens learned what had happened, they organized their own


elections. President Pierce, in a serious error of judgement, recognized the


first government as the official one, prompting widespread bloodshed


throughout the territory. This new territory, born of such dubious


beginnings, became known as “Bleeding Kansas”. Pierce and Douglas, from that


moment forward, would be scarred politically.


Buchanan ultimately won the election in the electoral college, although


he did not garner a popular majority. It was an uneasy victory, with


sectionalism clearly present in the vote tallies.


Normally, a period of relative calm follows a presidential election, but


the political rhetoric of this campaign and the unrelenting tension between


the North and the South would not allow it. On December 1, Pierce sent a


bitter and highly partisan message to Congress. He pointedly blamed the


continuing Kansas problems on northern propogandists and outside “agents of


disorder”. He accused


the Republicans of preparing the country for civil war. Many in Congress


were understandably outraged, reversing the charges of sectionalism right


back at Pierce. Some blamed the Kansas situation directly on the outgoing


president. In all, it was an unnecessarily unmagnanimous annual message.


The Buchanan Presidency: In their attempt to find a non-controversial


presidential candidate, the Democrats instead found themselves with a weak


president. Buchanan tried to appease both sides by appointing a mix of


northern and southern politicians to his cabinet, but each side accused him


of favoring the other for the important positions.


Buchanan never married, so the social duties of the White House were


handled by his niece, Harriet Lane. During a state visit by the Prince of


Wales, an orchestra performed the premiere of a new song dedicated to Miss


Lane, titled “Listen to the Mockingbird.” [Saturday Evening Post, pg 57]


Two significant events took place shortly after Buchanan’s inauguration,


both of them having a terrible affect upon the nation and neither one


attributable to Buchanan.


Two days after taking office, the Taney supreme court handed down its


infamous Dred Scott decision, or rather non-decision. The supreme court


basically decided that slaves were property and, therefore, had no rights in


the court system. The court cited the Fifth Amendment in refusing to meddle


in disputes involving slaves. In the larger sense,


though, the ruling declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional.


Buchanan supported the decision.


The second event was the Panic of 1857. Though not as severe as the


Panic of 1837, it did cause widespread unemployment. A drop in crop exports


to Europe, caused by the unexpected end to the Crimean War, caused a glut on


the US market with corresponding price drops. Bank failures led the way,


starting with the Ohio Life Insurance & Trust Company, which was actually


one of the most respected financial institutions in the country. Lack of


specie on hand led to many more bank closures. Secretary of the Treasury


Cobb had another $4 million in gold coins minted to increase the supply, but


the effort was fruitless. [Stampp, pgs 223-4] The industrialized Northeast


was hardest hit by the depression and northern manufacturers and bankers


naturally blamed southern Democrats. Sectionalism continued to worsen.


The Kansas controversy continued to plague the Buchanan


administration. He favored the admission of Kansas as a slave state. The


territorial government [the pro-slavery one recognized by Pierce] held a


statehood constitutional convention in Lecompton, which anti-slavery


factions refused to recognize. As a result, the pro-slavery forces won


control with only about ten percent voter participation. Anti-slavery forces


regained control of the territorial legislature in the next election and


voted down the document. [Brinkley, pg 375]


Buchanan, against clear evidence to the contrary, decided to side with


the Lecompton proposal. Stephen Douglas, in another bizarre moment of


political suicide, argued against the Lecompton document. The statehood


constitution was ultimately submitted to the general


population of Kansas, who overwhelmingly defeated the illegitimate document.


However, Kansas was not admitted to the union, as a free state, until the


closing days of the Buchanan administration. By then several southern states


had already seceded. Buchanan had failed.


BIBLIOGRAPHY:


Bergman, Peter M. The Chronological History of the Negro in America. New


York: Harper & Row, 1969.


Black, Earl and Black, Merle. The Vital South: How Presidents Are Elected.


Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.


Brinkley, Alan. American History, A Survey, Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill,


1995.


Meltzer, Milton. Milestones to American Liberty: the Foundations of the


Republic. New York: Cromwell, 1961.


Saturday Evening Post. The Presidents. Indianapolis: Curtis Publishing, 1980.


Shields-West, Eileen. World Almanac of Presidential Campaigns. New York: Pharos


Books, 1992.


Stamp, Kenneth M. America in 1857. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: The Contenders Essay Research Paper For the

Слов:1796
Символов:12924
Размер:25.24 Кб.