We Have An Environmental Crisis Because We Have A People Cris Essay, Research Paper
“We have an environmental crisis because we have a people crisis – a crisis of population growth, of wasteful consumption of resources, and a crisis of apathy and inaction.”
An environmental crisis is an emergency concerned with the place in which every human lives – the environment. A people crisis is an emergency with the community that inhabits the world environment. A crisis of population growth is a turning point where the environment can no longer sustain the amounts of people which it contains. A crisis of apathy and inaction is one where the human race cannot be motivated to solve the problems with the environment that they themselves have created.
The claim that we have an environmental crisis because we have a people crisis is valid
because our environmental problems have largely resulted from population growth, which has lead to apathy and inaction with regard to the wasteful consumption of resources. Examples are the desertification of the Sahel in Africa, the one child policy in China and the mis-management of our oceans.
The Sahel is a strip of land that extends for more than 6000 kilometres across the southern edge of the Sahara desert. It stretches from Senegal and Mauritania in the west to Ethiopia and Somalia in the east. These nations are among the world?s poorest.
The area is one of social and biophysical crisis because of the way the population are forced to live; they are destroying the productivity of the land. The alarming rate of population growth and ever increasing pressure on the land have initiated an expansion of desert-like conditions into the Sahel – a process called desertification.
Traditionally, the people of the drier, northern Sahel followed a nomadic lifestyle, constantly moving their herds of cattle, sheep and goats over large areas in the search for suitable grazing land. These movements prevented overgrazing and lessened the likelihood of land degradation. With increasing human numbers, the increased intensity of land use, and the harvesting of trees and scrub for fuel wood threaten to overwhelm the region?s fragile environment and result in permanent ecological damage and declining standard of living.
During the 20th century 3.9 billion people have been added to the world?s population.
This is an increase of 244%. Rapid growth occurred because of the improvement of living conditions, reduced child mortality rates and increased life expectancy.
The population of undeveloped nations will continue to grow in the foreseeable future because at present 45% of the population is under 15 years of age.
In the North the population growth is slowing down because children are considered an expense. In Italy, Germany and Austria, the growth rate is negative.
The slowdown in population growth is a result of the lower fertility rates that have accompanied improvements in the quality of people?s lives and the increasing use of contraceptives throughout the South. As peoples? economic well-being improves they tend to have less children.
Future efforts to control population growth will depend on the North?s capacity to share the world?s resources and the ability of poor nations to improve the quality of life experienced by their people.
At the beginning of this century there were some 426 million people living in China. This has resulted in a country that has endured the demographic effects of devastating famines, wars, and epidemics for millennia; the population growth and change that occurred in the 20th century is unprecedented.
By the year 2000, the Chinese population is officially projected to top the 1.3 billion mark. About two-thirds of this 900 million increase was added within the last 50 years, as mortality was reduced amid high fertility rates.
The Chinese government has been moved by this “demographic affluence” to curb fertility. China’s strategic demographic initiatives (SDI) were contrived out of this need. The government installed numerous measures for curbing fertility, embracing delayed marriage, sterilisation, all known contraceptive methods, and abortion. Exhortations, campaigns, financial and material incentives, and numerous other sanctions were used to implement the policies. All these efforts were, at first, to redirect young couples to have fewer offspring and, later, to heed the one-child-per-couple, or “minimal
reproduction,” policy.
The purpose of this call for minimal reproduction was to keep the population from exceeding 1.2 billion by the year 2000. The scheme has proved problematic inside the country and controversial abroad for practical, political, ethical, and religious reasons.
The massive gain in population in recent decades has intensified old difficulties in the country’s effort to raise living standards, and
The global significance of China’s demographics is likewise enormous. Whatever the size of China’s population is at the dawn of the 21st century it is certain to account for twenty percent of the world’s projected population. China’s industrialisation, modernisation, expanding use of natural resources, and rising consumption will increasingly disrupt the earth’s ecosystem.
It has been thought that the world?s seas would provide an inexhaustible supply of fish, however, this has been found to be untrue. Since the 1950?s there has been a rapid increase in the amount of fish caught and most traditional food fishes are now over-exploited and stocks are falling.
Overfishing is partly the result of the belief that the world?s oceans are common property, and belong to everyone. They have been seen as a resource open to everyone with no one responsible for their protection. This has led to exploitation and the ?Tragedy of the Commons”. This tragedy occurs when a resource is freely available to everyone; everyone uses the resource to the maximum so that the resource is eventually destroyed.
Each year the cities of the world flush enough oil down their storm water drains and sewers into the sea to fill three Exxon Valdez supertankers. Large areas of seas such as the Baltic and Mediterranean are now dead from pollution.
Fishing is the most traditional activity in Australian waters . Today a fleet of 10,000 boats lands a harvest of 200,000 tonnes of fish, prawns lobsters ad shellfish worth $1.2 billion a year.
Being long-established, the fishing industry was also first to encounter the biological limits of local waters: of our top 10 fisheries, five are now classed as over-exploited and five fully exploited. Now, if a particular fishery drops to unsustainable levels, catch limits may be imposed. In greatest difficulties are southern bluefin tuna, southern shark and gemfish. New fishery prospects are few and costly to develop, most being in deep water.
Related problems in fishing include the extent to which trawling damages the sea-bottom and changes the populations of sea creatures, and the growing confrontation between inshore fishers and recreational anglers, which many now predict will end in bans on professional fishing.
The ever increasing need for food due to population growth, has led to wider areas of the oceans being fished. Increasingly, fishing is taking place far out to sea, beyond the continental shelf in the waters of the continental slopes and ocean depths. Large fishing nations such as Japan, the USSR and the USA have fleets of trawlers that operate in these areas using the latest technology which further deplete ocean stocks.
These modern methods exploit the ocean resources by catching too much fish and by not being selective in what fish they catch before it is too late to throw them back. This will eventually deplete world?s fish supplies and if trawler companies do not start to limit catches.
The major issue concerned with the downfall of our oceans is that marine life is vital to the food chain which includes our survival in the future.
There are many other long term issues involved within environmental crisis. Some of these are air pollution, garbage, logging and erosion. Often governments overlook these problems when creating new policies because they seem to be more concerned with immediate economic considerations. Globally, there is an indifference towards environmental issues and a lack of concern for the well-being of the world environment today. These examples have illustrated that people put their own personal needs before the survival of the earth. The developed nations of the earth need to take a larger responsibility for the environment, as they have been educated to the ill effects of pollution and over-population and they have only themselves to blame for environmental destruction. As for the people in the nations of the South, population growth needs to be slowed possibly by educating women about contraception, economic incentives, people interested in careers, less infant mortality and increasing the cost of children.
Apathy and inaction can be reversed by concerted and effective Government policies
that encourage personal, social and economic benefits. Apathy must be resisted if our planet is to survive.