Stegner

’s View Of The True Hero Of The West Essay, Research Paper


The West ” home on the range where the deer and the antelope


play; where seldom is heard a discouraging word and the sky is not cloudy all


day.”The romantic idea of the land west of the hundredth meridian has often inspired


songs and poetry, like this one, about idyllic conditions in this dry “paradise.”Often


these ideas did not prove to be completely accurate, and a very few people attempted


to present the facts to the public to dispel the romantic ideas of an effortless


existence in these western lands. John Wesley Powell was one of these people.


Wallace Stegner viewed Powell as a champion for science and one of the true heroes


of this time because he did not follow the romantic ideas that so many of his


contemporaries held about settlement in the West. One of the men Stegner presented


as the epitome of Western romanticism was the Honorable William Gilpin, who eventually


became the first territorial governor of Colorado. Throughout Stegner’s book,


he used Gilpin as a contrast to Powell, who represented science. Gilpin was the


example of the people that Stegner believed to be enamored with the idea of the


West as a huge frontier, able to support millions, without looking at the facts


and examining the situation from a scientist’s point of view. He pointed out several


differences in Powell and Gilpin that illustrate how he believed Powell to be


the hero, even though he was never recognized as one, and Gilpin to be a dreamer.


Stegner gave several examples to prove that the loudest promoters of settlement


were often ignorant of the lands in which they lived, which proved that they were


in fact, unable to determine whether the West was ready to be settled. One of


the examples Stegner used was the fact that Gilpin believed all Indian tribes


to be the same. In his zeal to promote Western settlement, he made the statement


that with settlement in these lands came a unity of the people of the United States.


Native American races were his examples, saying that they exhibited a “perfect


identity in hair, complexion, features, religion, stature, and language”(p. 3).


Powell, however, knew that this was not the case from studying the different races


and using scientific methods. In his studies, he determined that they were, in


fact, very different. He discovered literally hundreds of distinct languages,


peoples of different skin color and eye color, and very different religions and


customs (p. 8). Another example of how inept Gilpin was in determining whether


or not the West could be settled was in his statement that all of the United States


was known to its citizens (p. 2). He disregarded the fact that many maps made


of the West had gaps and empty spaces that no white man had yet explored. Powell


was one of the first to try to fill in the gaps without accepting the idea that


the West was completely known to the United States. He explored several rivers


and many areas of land, taking notes, identifying new plants and animals, and


filling in the blanks on maps that had been forgotten or ignored for one reason


or another. Gilpin attempted to fill in these blanks with romance and claimed


that the West was well-known and was beckoning easterners to settle its vast lands.


Gilpin promoted settlement loudly in the West, making unsuppo

rted claims about


the wealth of the area. He claimed that firewood was in abundance underground


and that all settlers had to do was to dig to obtain it (p. 3). They could dig


for water also because, according to him, the West had great underground artesian


wells that would provide enough water for millions of settlers (p. 7). If this


was not enough water, there was always the possibility of irrigation because of


the plentiful water supplies from the melting snow on the mountains. He made the


statement that “agriculture was effortless,”clinging to the idea that “rain followed


the plow”(p. 4). Using these unsupported claims, he declared that there were no


longer any hindrances to settlement on the plains (p. 3). Powell disputed all


of these ideas, using facts to disprove him. He fought in Congress, stating facts


and arguing against the idea of rain following the plow. He also predicted that


out of all the land that they had planned to irrigate, only twelve percent would


be irrigated (p. 343). In his arguments against the great ideas about settlement


on the plains, he stated that the United States government and the Gilpins of


this day were “piling up a heritage of conflict and litigation over water rights


for there is no sufficient water to supply the land.”(p. 343). Powell’s ideas


were not welcome to Gilpin and those like him. When he presented his facts that


did not support settlement, he was booed (p. 343). Those pushing settlement in


the West did not want to hear about the conflicts, the land problems, the water


problems, and the unknown parts of the country (p. 218). Stegner even claimed


that Gilpin, “after half a lifetime in the West, could see through a glass eye


so darkly that he denied geography, topography, meteorology, and the plain evidence


of his senses, and his advice to America and his dream of the future floated upward


on the draft of his own bombast.”(p. 50). Unfortunately for Western settlers,


Gilpin’s ideas were more popular in that day than were Powell’s. The ignorance


of the settlers and the outright refusal of Gilpin and his contemporaries to listen


to reason helped to cause tragedies that could have been otherwise avoided. Many


of Powell’s predictions proved to be correct, and he had a much clearer and more


practical way of utilizing Western resources. Only twelve percent of the land


has been irrigated, just as Powell stated would occur. Rain did not follow the


plow, as Gilpin and his supporters adamantly claimed, and settlers on the plains


often experienced droughts and sometimes struggled to merely survive. Many lives


were lost and farmers often found themselves losing their land because they were


unprepared to settle in the lands that were promoted as being a paradise. Although


Powell attempted to prove that the West was not ready to be settled and presented


facts to support his case, Gilpin and his contemporaries would not listen to reason.


Their lofty ideals about the romance of the West spread across the nation like


wildfire, and the romance still exists today. With the asset of hindsight, Stegner


knew the facts about western settlement, and because Powell was one of the few


who tried to present these facts to a nation unwilling to listen, he viewed Powell


as a hero.


394


West of the Hundreth Meridian by Wallace Stegner

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Stegner

Слов:1219
Символов:7819
Размер:15.27 Кб.