РефератыИностранный языкA A Balanced Budget Essay Research Paper A

A Balanced Budget Essay Research Paper A

A Balanced Budget? Essay, Research Paper


A Balanced Budget?


This year President Clinton will submit his proposed legislation for the


Federal Budget to Congress. The fact that we have divided government (ex.,


Democratic President, Republican majority in Congress) means the majority of


that legislation won’t make it through the first ten minutes of a Congressional


session. The President in turn will veto legislation presented to him by


Congress. The whole situation is a vicious, never ending circle. Each side is


looking out for their own best interests, and after years, even decades of this


the United States has a huge budget deficit. Is there a solution to all this


madness? Is it feasible to balance the Federal Budget? Every politician on


Capitol Hill claims to have the answer. The Federal Government goes as far to


employ some of the most renowned economist’s in the world to try to solve the


deficit mess, and they still haven’t figured it out.


The budget simulation exercise by The Committee for a Responsible


Federal Budget provided choices Congress has to use as its guide for the


upcoming year. How hard can it be to balance the budget I thought? After doing


the exercised I realized the title of the simulation exercise, “The FY 1997


Budget: An Exercise in Hard Choices,” could not have been more appropriate. It


is possible though to balance the Federal Budget, provided you follow 3 simple


rules. First you must decide what you feel is important, then cut without


consciousness, and if that doesn’t work, alter your baseline.


Important Choices


When deciding on what I thought was important to protect in the budget,


I felt like a politician myself. I protected my own self interests. First up was


Defense. The fact that I am in the Marine Officer Program weighed heavily on my


decision to increase Defense spending by 17.6 billion (all amounts in billions,


unless noted), following the Congressional Budget Resolution. The President’s


plan just didn’t provide enough capital, the Congressional Black


Caucus/Progressive Caucus would basically wipe out my career before it even


starts, and I just can not have that. Next up is Education. Without the direct


student loan program, I would have no way to fund my education other than going


to some bank and going through the demeaning process of begging a loan officer


to lend me money for school. I feel a sense of loyalty to the President on this


issue, because without this program I would still be doing concrete construction


back home in Indiana. As a result, I voted to increase Educational spending


33.4.My other concern or problem area is Administration of Justice. Crime is way


out of control in this country. There has to be an end. I voted to increase


spending 23.6, opting for the President’s budget because it provides enough


capital to temporarily combat the problem. You might be thinking, wow this fool


just increased the deficit by 74.6, but unless are borders are protected, are


children educated, and until we can feel safe in our homes at night, this


country won’t realize it’s potential.


International & Domestic Spending


At this point, the deficit stands at 883.6 (809 billion beginning +


current spending). It is time to cut the waste. First, International Affairs


requires attention. Does the United States really need to fund every country’s


struggle? I don’t think so, so I agree with the Budget Resolution Conference


Agreement (BRCA), and I vote to cut 12.4.


Next on the list, General Science, Space and Technology. I vote to


discontinue the Space Station Program. As the report says, scientists have lost


interest so why keep funding it. Another 11.2 by the wayside.


The Energy issue is a complex one, but nevertheless the DOE has to go.


The DOE is a bureaucracy of waste. The DOE has several institutions doing the


same research. By Eliminating the DOE as a go-between, money and time saved. The


BRCA proposal is more beneficial to my pursuit of a balanced budget, eliminating


4.2.


Natural Resources are a touchy subject, but in order to balance the


budget, everyone has to chip in. By charging the fair market value for natural


resources, 21 billion saved.


Agriculture is essential, but it is not necessary to increase salaries


and expenses of Farm Service Agency employees, which the President’s budget


does.. The BRCA cuts 4.1.


Commerce and Housing Credit, another huge buearucracy, has to go. By


eliminating the Department of Commerce, and by broadening FCC Authority to


Auction Licenses, total saving equals 10.4.


Transportation is another touchy subject, what with all the airline


tragedies and train crashes. This subject is constantly in the news. Terminating


the Federal Transit Administration and leaving the states to be responsible for


funding, 23 billion saved. Also by reducing or eliminating other Transport


Subsidies I save another 6.2.


Community and Regional Development are an issue I have never really


given much consideration to, but with the spending I did earlier, I need to make


cuts. The BRCA cuts the most. I propose to follow their legislation cutting 21.5.

p>

Health was in the news when Clinton was first elected. I liked his


rhetoric then, and although I need to make cuts, I stand by his proposal of 45.3.


even though it is only half of what the BRCA proposes to do this is a very


sensitive area of policy, and cutting to much could mean reelection.


What about Medicare? To play it safe, I went with the BRCA proposal


because it reforms Comprehensive Medicare, just not as much as the President’s


Proposal. The CBO Illustrative Comprehensive Options were a brief and passing


thought, but overall I believe they hurt Medicare more than either of the other


two proposals. Saving equates to 182.6.


As far as Income Security goes, I recommend following the BRCA proposal.


Their proposal cuts 45.4, so for those people on welfare, get out and get a job.


Social Security is a sore topic for many individuals. I would propose


cutting Social Security completely, but that wasn’t an option. Why should I pay


for something I’ll never get anything out of. Forced to choose some kind of cuts,


I suggest first skipping one COLA for One Year, a saving’s of 57.9. By Reducing


the Replacement Rate Within Each Bracket of Social Security I am able to save an


additional 11.8.


Something I failed to realize earlier, Veterans Benefits and Services.


This is something I might one day need based on my career aspirations. I chose


to go with the BRCA because it increases the Presidents budget in categories


such as medical care and medical research. Total saving amounts to 9.4 billion.


With the Federal Compensation and General Government portion of the


budget, I thought it to be a bad idea in cutting pay to government employees. If


I were a Member of Congress, I could consider myself blacklisted. Also I one day


hope to be a government employee via the military. I propose Reducing COLAS to


Middle or High Income Retirees, saving 11 billion. I also would raise Employee


Contributions. By doing so, it only benefits these same employees in the future


when they retire, and it also allows me to trim an additional 12.4 off of the


deficit.


As for means testing, I chose to reduce this area by opting for


Reduction of Benefits to Middle and High Income Families. Families with an


annual income of $40,000 really don’t need help. I chose to not cut anything


else, but I was able to do 303.3 in damage to the deficit.


Revenue


Going into Revenues, I have saved 793.9 billion, but still the budget


remains unbalanced. Here, I decided to tax imported oil, saving 62.5. Next,


taxing Toxic Water Pollutants as well as levying an Excise Tax on Air Pollutants


nets an additional 170.7. Also by increasing tobacco taxes to 48 cents per pack


netted 22.3. As for a running total, 1048.7 billion remains unspent.


Unfortunately there happens to be some programs that need money. First,


I chose to spend 117 billion on giving tax credits for Families/Children, opting


for the President’s budget. I voted to repeal the 4.3 cent motor fuels tax,


spending 2.9. Finally, I spent 15.6 to Provide Tax Incentives for Long – Term


Care Insurance. All this spending on revenues cost me 187.2 billion. My rational


behind my spending, is once again in my own self interest, for if I was a Member


of Congress, with all the cuts I have made, I have to give back a little.


Balanced?


Will the budget balance? Before the exercise began there was an 809


billion deficit. I spent 209.3 billion, on a total of 6 different programs. I


cut 1048.7 billion from 18 different recipients of federal dollars. This amounts


to a balanced budget. Total Deficit Reduction from Policy changes equaled


838.7(all amounts in billions). Interest savings amounted to 83.87. Total


deficit reduction, 992.57. Add in the baseline budget deficit of 809 billion


from the previous year. 113.57 remains. Policy changes totaled at 718.7.


Spending changes as a percentage ended up 85.7%. Finally revenue changes


finished at 14.31%.


Is it feasible to balance the Federal Budget? It is if it is a game or


assignment. Dealing with issues that effect individuals from all walks of life


is almost impossible. I cut all but a few categories under International &


Domestic Spending. It is not realistic in the real world. Cutting funding for


one program not only effects those involved, but inadvertently effects’ others.


An example would be cutting welfare benefits. With no money, no job, and no


future prospects, an individual might result to crime, whether selling narcotics


or robbery, in order to support their family. The decisions that the President


makes in preparing a budget have to be overwhelming. In Congress, individual


decisions are more anonymous. The records are accessible, but who really


remembers how an individual Member of Congress voted. How many taxpayers know


what a baseline is. The President and Congress each uses their own baseline, it


helps them justify spending or cuts. Until the President and Congress can agree


to bal ance the budget, cut waste, and quit talking about it, there will be a


deficit.


Works Cited


Exercise In Hard Choices. Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. July 1996.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: A Balanced Budget Essay Research Paper A

Слов:1857
Символов:12216
Размер:23.86 Кб.