РефератыИностранный языкRoRomantic Opinions In The Work Of Percy

Romantic Opinions In The Work Of Percy

Bysshe Shelley Essay, Research Paper


To think of something romantically is to think of it naively, in a positive


light, away from the view of the majority. Percy Bysshe Shelley has many


romantic themes in his plays. Educated at Eton College, he went on to the


University of Oxford only to be expelled after one year after publishing an


inappropriate collection of poems. He then worked on writing full-time, and


moved to Italy shortly before his death in a boating accident off the shore


of Leghorn. He wrote many pieces, and his writing contains numerous themes.


Shelley experienced first-hand the French Revolution. This allowed him to


ponder many different situations, and determine deep philosophical views -


views that were so radically different they were considered naive at best,


downright wrong at worst. He contemplated socialism, having for a


father-in-law William Godwin, who was the prominent socialist in the United


Kingdom in Shelley’s time. Shelley liked Napolean, and was suspicious of both


the Bourbon monarchy and the Directory. Most of all, Shelley felt that all


people had the right to work for themselves; he did not support the notion


that once one had been born into a class, one must stay in that class for the


rest of one’s life. Shelley felt that all bodies of the universe were


governed by the same principle, completely contradicting the given theories,


those of Aristotle. Thus, Shelley gained a romantic and rather naive view of


the universe. In fact, Carlos Baker describes his poems as "The Fabric of a


Vision". (Baker 1) In Percy Bysshe Shelley’s poems, the author uses those


naive, romantic opinions on the themes of romance, politics, and science.


Romance is well defined as a theme choice for Shelley. Shelley uses this


theme rather romantically; one could say that Shelley’s theme in his amorous


poetry is unrestricted passion; love, Shelley feels, can overcome all


obstacles, distance, fear, even death. One example of this is in Shelley’s


poem which is titled by the first line: "I fear thy kisses, gentle maiden":


"I fear thy kisses gentle maiden;/Thou needst not fear mine;/My spirit is too


deeply laiden/Ever to burden thine/I fear thy mien, thy tones, thy


motion;/Thou needst not fear mine;/Innocent is the heart’s devotion/With


which I worship thine" In this poem Shelley is observing that he feels


inferior to his maiden; he "fears" her kisses because he is intimidated by


her perfection to the point where he feels as though he is stifling her, that


she is compromising her own value by falling in love with him; this is why


the maiden should not fear Shelley. He emphasizes his own faults in line 3,


by stating that his spirit is "too deeply laiden" to be good enough for his


maiden. He also mentions that everything about her is perfect, her body


(mien), her voice (tones), and her walk (motion). In the last line, Shelley


asserts that he feels so inconsequential that he wishes to place his maiden


on a pedestal and worship her, as opposed to treating her as an equal. In


this way does Shelley show his unbounded passion for his maiden. Another


example of this is in Julian and Maddalo, a long text wherein Maddalo is


traveling to meet his beloved Julian. William Hazlitt reviewed as "a


Conversation or Tale, full of that thoughtful and romantic humanity… which


distinguished Mr. Shelley’s writings." (500) The lines he most seemingly


referred to were lines 13-19, which state "…I love all waste/And solitary


places; where we taste/The pleasure of believing what we see/Is boundless, as


we wish our souls to be./And such was this wide ocean, and this shore/More


than it’s billows…" Shelley is referring to the love that partners have for


eachother; this love is boundless, with infinite possibilities for showing


this passion, both physical and honorable. True love turns away from faults


and inefficiencies, which bound all other virtues (talent, strength, et


cetera); Shelley wishes that his body had that kind of freedom, the freedom


to roam around without a care in the world, and thus the freedom to do


whatever he chooses, knowing that nothing will be affected by the mistakes he


makes. Lovers whose love is true have this ability, the ability to forgive


and forget for the numerous errors that either partner commits. This is


easily translatable to any era and any person, which is the meaning of


Hazlitt’s remark. Yet another example of this can be seen in Arethusa, with


the lines 19-37:


And now from their fountains


In Enna’s mountains,


Down one vale where the morning basks,


Like friends once parted


Grown single-hearted,


They ply their watery tasks.


At sunrise they leap


>From their cradles steep


In the cave of the shelving hill;


At noontide they flow


Through the woods below


And the meadows of asphodel;


And at night they sleep


In the rocking deep


Beneath the Ortygian shore;


Like spirits that lie


In the azure sky


When they love but live no more.


In this poem Shelley is playing on one of the most beloved fantasies of both


men and women, which is for the gorgeous, breathtakingly beautiful woman to


be swiftly carried away by a tall, handsome, strong gentleman to a remote


island where the two of them can make love in peace until the end of their


days. Arethusa is carried by Alpheus to a luscious island where they act


amorously until they die, their love for eachother lasting much longer than


their mortal lives. More evidence of Shelley being the "incurable


romanticist" comes in the poem The Dirge, which discusses a person who sees


his significant other in a coffin: "Ere the sun through the heaven once more


roll’d,/The rats in her heart/Will have made their nest/And the worms be


alive in her golden hair/While the spirit that guides the sun/Sits throned in


his flaming chair/She shall sleep." (Hazlitt 494) Again Mr. Hazlitt remarks


that this poem "…is a fragment of the manner in which this craving…this


desire to elevate and surprise,…leads us to overstep the modesty of nature


and the bounds of decorum." (494). In the poem, Shelley imagines that his


wife, Mary, in the coffin, dead; he is so deeply in love with her that he


cannot bear the thought of her death, and the thought of worms, rats, and


parasites decomposing her once-dazzling body; the golden hair may or may not


refer to Mary, because it is not certain that she had blonde hair, but rather


one find finds his significant other’s hair, rather amorously, beautiful, of


extremely fine quality, like gold. The flaming chair refers to Purgatory, the


weigh station before a soul can pass to heaven, according to the doctrines of


Roman Catholic Christians. The thought of the inspiration for all of his


passion being decomposed by parasitic, filthy creatures scares Shelley, as it


would any other man whose woman lays in a coffin. Thus, Shelley is able to


emphasize unbridled, noble passion in his poems.


Another theme Shelley exhibits in his poems is politics and social reform.


Shelley spent many years in France during the French Revolution, at a time


when the French did not respect any leader except Napolean. Europe set up the


Congress of Vienna, whose job was to oust Napolean after he tried to take all


of Europe, banish him to a remote island, and reset the borders of Europe to


what they were before they banished him. It took them two tries to get it


right, because Napolean returned to France, where he was still revered, and


attempted to conquer Europe again. He was finally defeated by the same


general, and was banished correctly. In his The Mask of Anarchy, Shelley


asserts that "I met murder on the way- He had a mask like Castlereagh, Very


smooth he looked, yet grim; Seven bloodhounds followed him." (ll. 8-12) Lord


Castlereagh was the United Kingdom’s representative to the Congress of Vienna


in 1819; Castlereagh had the Congress impose harsh sanctions on France, and


the seven that followed him were seven countries that felt the same way,


including Austria, Prussia, and Russia, the dominant military powers of the


time. Shelley feels that the sanctions that Castlereagh imposed were too


severe, and thus would lead to the demise of both France specifically and


Europe in general. Shelley proved to be a prophet, for much land was given to


the Kaiser Wilheim II of Prussia, who then, drunk with power, formed Germany,


a nation that then attempted – twice – to conquer all of Europe. Harold Bloom


notes that "…the Power speaks forth, through a poet’s act of confrontation


with it that is the very act of writing his poem, and the Power, rightly


interpreted, can be used to repeal the large code of fraud, institutional and


historical Christianity, and the equally massive code of woe, the laws of the


nation-states of Europe in the age of Castlereagh and Metternich…" (87).


Shelley, in writing this poem, is attempting to reveal the corruption at the


Congress of Vienna. Shelley’s aforementioned wife, Mary, comments on her


husband in a similar way. "…[Percy Shelley] had been from youth the victim


of the state of feeling inspired by the French Revolution; and believing in


the justice and excellence of his view, it cannot be wondered that a nature


as sensitive, as impetuous, and as generous as his, should put it’s whole


force into the attempt to alleviate for others the evils of those systems


from which he had himself suffered." (ix). Mrs. Shelley is referring to


Percy’s whol

e-hearted faith in Napolean; he felt abused by the monarchy and


the National Convention, which overthrew the monarchy in favor of a republic.


The commoners of France felt a void that only Naploean filled; Napolean gave


the commoners a sense of nationalism and patriotism. And when Europe banished


Napolean for a second time to a remote South Atlantic island. Shelley wrote


this sarcastic sonnet, Feelings of a Republican on the fall of Bonaparte, in


which a Napolean dissenter addresses the dead tyrant: "…For this I prayed,


would on thy sleep have crept/Treason and Slavery, Rapine, Fear, and


Lust,/And stifled thee, their minister. I know/Too Late, since thou and


France are in the dust,/That virtue owns a more eternal foe/Than Force or


Fraud, old Custom, legal Crime,/And bloody Faith the foulest birth of Time."


(ll. 8-14). The Republican states that while Napolean is asleep (banished


from France), many traits returned, such as devastation, treason, slavery,


and crime; and the rest of Europe pinned the blame onto Napolean, which was


unfair. Shelley supported Napolean, and wrote this poem to show the mistake


France was making in allowing the Congress to banish him. *Shelley also had a


strong opinion about the conditions of English laborers, which he addressed


in his poem, Song to the Men of England. "He looked on political freedom as


the direct agent to effect the happiness of mankind; and thus any new-sprung


hope of liberty inspired a joy and an exulation more intense and wild than he


could have felt for any personal advantage.", notes wife Mary. (ix) Shelley


felt great joy in exposing the inefficiences of certain governments and their


treatment of certain groups of people; he felt the British working class were


losing in the capitalist parliamentary society that was in place in the


United Kingdom at the time, and felt a great sense of pride in exposing this


to the general public, as seen in this quote, "Men of England, wherefore


plough/For the lords who lay ye so low?/Wherefore weave with toil and


care/The rich robes your tyrants wear/******/Wherefore, Bees of England,


forge/Many a weapon, chain, and scourge,/That these stingless drones may


spoil/The forced produce of your toil." (Baker 158) Shelley is attempting to


show the British commoners that they are working for people who think they


are better than the commoners, and who do not care about the working class.


He wants to stir anger against the "capitalist tyrants", perhaps under the


influence of Godwin. He was not successful, but he proved his point. Thus


Shelley has a romantic, naive view of politics and government.


Shelley also shows his romanticism in the field of science. At the time, the


view of the majority was Aristotelian, regardless of what others may prove.


Shelley, however, sided with the modernists, who were able to disprove


Aristotle but were not taken seriously, and were thought to be theologically


backward. An example of the science entering the poem is in Notes to Queen


Mab. Notes Desmond King-Hele: "…in 1813 [Shelley] wrote, ‘I am determined


not to relax until I have attained a considerable proficiency in the physical


sciences’ …the first fruits of Shelley’s astronomical studies appears in


Notes to Queen Mab…" (164-165). Shelley’s first note is the one that best


exemplifies the point. "…’The sun’s unclouded orb/Rolled through the black


concave’…Beyond our atmosphere the sun would appear a rayless orb of fire


in the midst of a black concave. The equal diffusion of it’s light on earth


is owing to the refraction of the rays by the atmosphere, and their


reflection from other bodies." (Complete Works 135). Shelley wanted to


dispel the belief that the sun actually shot rays of light toward the earth,


when in fact the "rays" that we see is light from the sun being refracted by


the Earth and many other planetary objects in space. Shelley embraced this


view, and many other views of the modernists; and, as Desmond King-Hele


noted, "…without understanding the science undertone, Prometheus Unbound


loses half it’s bite." (169). In fact, in that piece is the belief that


Shelley held, which was that he "…believed that fire, light, heat, caloric,


phlogiston, and electricity were, of not identical, merely modifications of


the same principle…the hypothesis certainly appealed to Shelley, who made


good use of it in Prometheus Unbound." (King-Hele 159). King-Hele uses this


passage as his evidence (177) :


The bubbles, which the enchantment of the sun


Sucks from the pale faint water-flowers that pave


The oozy bottom of clear lakes and pools,


Are the pavilions where such dwell and float…


And when these burst; and the thin, fiery air,


The which they breathed within those lucent domes,


Ascends to flow like meteors through the night,


They ride on them, and; and rein their headlong speed,


And bow their burning crests, and glide in fire


Under the waters of the earth again.


In the passage, Shelley shows a phenomena between meteors falling into the


Earth’s atmosphere and bubbles from decaying vegetation as having the same


theoretical principle. Shelley sided with the modernists, with a view that


was at the time considered novel but highly unlikely. Another piece of


evidence for Shelley’s science background comes from Ode to the West Wind, in


which Shelley discusses clouds. "Thou on whose stream, mid the steep sky’s


commotion,/Loose clouds like earth’s decaying leaves are shed,/Shook from the


tangled boughs of Heaven and Ocean." (ll. 15-17). While his contemporaries


felt that rain was a sign from God, Shelley had a more literal view. "As


Shelley sees it, about two-thirds of sky is blue and about one-third, from


nearly overhead to as far as the eye can see west, is covered by a high filmy


layer of white, streaky mare’s-tail or plume cirrus…low in the west are


jagged detached clouds, scud or fractostratus, grey and watery, approaching


fast in the rising wind… in the [stanza], the loose clouds shed like


earth’s decaying leaves in to the airstream, are the fractostratus clouds,


harbingers of rain." (King-Hele 215-216). What Shelley describes in the poem


is the last third of the sky, releasing it’s rain like dead leaves off a tree


in autumn; at the time, all things "falling from the sky" were thought to be


a sign of God; Gallileo said it best when asked where is God. "Certainly not


up [in the sky]." When asked then where was He, he replied, "How should I


know? I’m a mathematician, not a theologian." Shelley showed that modernists


like Gallileo were correct, that God could not ride a cloud around the Earth


as Aristotle believed. Shelley shows that rain is also a scientific function,


not a function of Him. Thus, Shelley undertones many poems with science.


In conclusion, Percy Bysshe Shelley had a lifetime of adventures from which


he was able to form naive and romantic opinions, which undertone his poems.


For example, he feels that love can conquer all obstacles, including


distance, like Julian and Maddalo and Arethusa, fear of inferiority, as in "I


fear thy kisses, gentle maiden", and even death, as in The Dirge. Shelley


also laces his political poems with his romanticist views. He shows his


support for a tyrant who tried to conquer the known world twice in Napoleon,


as in Feelings of a Republican on the Fall of Bonaparte; he attempts to stir


emotions towards socialism in Song to the Men of England; and he attempted to


smite the Congress of Vienna, which for a while brought order and stability


back to Europe, in The Mask of Anarchy. He also had what as considered naive


views on the sciences, which admittedly are now known to be true. He shows


that all bodies operate under the same principle in Prometheus Unbound; shows


how rain is made, indirectly by God, directly by clouds, not the other way as


one in the 18th or 19th century might argue, in Ode to the West Wind; and he


explained from where the sun’s "rays" are coming, and again disproved the


notion that God directly poured them into the Earth, in his Notes to Queen


Mab. Thus, Shelley undertones his poetry with the naive views of life he held


during his lifetime.


Bibliography


Baker, Carlos. Shelley’s Major Poetry. New York: Princeton Unversity Press,


1961.


Blank, G. Kim. Wordsworth’s Influence on Shelley. New York: St. Martin’s


Press, 1988.


Bloom, Harold. "The Unpastured Sea: An Introduction to Shelley." The Ringers


in the Tower: Studies in Romantic Tradition. Chicago: The University of


Chicago Press, 1971.


Cambell, Pyre, and Weaver, eds. Poetry and Criticism of the Romantic


Movement. New York: F.S. Crofts and Comapny, 1932.


Hazlitt, William. "A Review of Shelley’s Posthumous Poems." Nineteenth


Century Literary Criticism. Kansas City: Random House, January 1988.


Ingpen, Peck, eds. The Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Volume I. New


York: Gordian Press, 1965.


King-Hele, Desmond. Shelley: His Thought and Work. Teaneck: Farleigh


Dickinson University Press, 1960.


Knopf, Alfred, ed. Shelley: Poems. Toronto: David Campbell Publishers Ltd.,


1993.


"Percy Bysshe Shelley." Adventures in English Literature. New York: Harcourt


Brace Jovanovich, 1973.


Shelley, Mary. "Mrs. Shelley’s Preface to the Collected Poems, 1839." The


Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley: Poems, Vol. 1 by Percy Bysshe


Shelley. Ingpen and Peck, eds. Toronto:


Gordian Press, 1965.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Romantic Opinions In The Work Of Percy

Слов:3393
Символов:22819
Размер:44.57 Кб.