Author

’s View Of Human Behaivior Essay, Research Paper


An author’s view of human behavior is often reflected in their


works. The novels All Quiet on the Western Front by Erich Maria


Remarque and Lord of the Flies by William Golding are both examples of


works that demonstrate their author’s view of man, as well his opinion


of war.


Golding’s Lord of the Flies is highly demonstrative of Golding’s


opinion that society is a thin and fragile veil that when removed


shows man for what he truly is, a savage animal. Perhaps the bet


demonstration of this given by Golding is Jack’s progression to the


killing of the sow. Upon first landing on the island Jack, Ralph, and


Simon go to survey their new home. Along the way the boys have their


first encounter with the island’s pigs. They see a piglet caught in


some of the plants. Quickly Jack draws his knife so as to kill the


piglet. Instead of completing the act, however, Jack hesitates.


Golding states that, “The pause was only long enough for them to


realize the enormity of what the downward stroke would be.” Golding is


suggesting that the societal taboos placed on killing are still


ingrained within Jack. The next significant encounter in Jack’s


progression is his first killing of a pig. There is a description of a


great celebration. The boys chant “Kill the pig. Cut her throat. Spill


her blood.” It is clear from Golding’s description of the revelry that


followed the killing that the act of the hunt provided the boys with


more than food. The action of killing another living thing gives them


pleasure. The last stage in Jack’s metamorphosis is demonstrated by


the murder of the sow. Golding describes the killing almost as a rape.


He says, “Jack was on top of the sow, stabbing downward wherever pig


flesh appeared … Jack found the throat, and the hot blood spouted


over his hands. The sow collapsed under them and they were heavy and


fulfilled upon her.” In this case it is certain that animal savagery


is displayed by the boys. Because they have been away from organized


society for such a long time, the boys of the island have become


Golding’s view of mankind, vile, destructive beasts.


Although Golding shows that the longer one is away from society


the closer to his view one becomes, the institution of civilization


does not escape his criticism. Golding shows through many examples


that those who are “civilized” are just as prone to violence and war


as those who are isolated. The first example presented in the novel


occurs when the boys attempt to emulate the British democratic


government. The boys prize the adults that run the government as the


best decision makers. It is these “civilized” adults, however, who


started the war which has forced the boys onto the island.


Also, in their mimicking of adult society, one of the first things


that the boys do is establish the choir as an army or a group of


hunters. Another of the criticisms of orderly society comes when Ralph


asks for a sign from the adult world. Ralph does receive his sign in


the form of a dead parachute shot down in an air battle above the


island. This can be interpreted as saying that the savagery existent


in man is even shown in the so called “civilized” world through acts


of war. Golding clearly sees war as an action of destruction caused by


man because of his inherently feral nature.


While Golding views man as a brutal creature whose vile traits are


brought out by isolation from society, Remarque’s All Quiet on the


Western Front displays a remarkably contrasting opinion of humanity.


Where Golding’s characters become incre

asingly more sadistic when


placed in a difficult circumstance, those of Remarque manage to


actually grow more caring and develop a feeling of comradeship. It is


clear that despite the fact that Remarque’s main character and


narrator, Paul B?umer, is taking part in a war and killing others, he


is not a brutal disgusting creature. Even on the front, where Paul is


in danger of losing his life, he acts in a way directly contrasting


Golding’s view of man as a vicious hunter. Paul is faced with a French


soldier who he is to throw a grenade at. Upon seeing his face,


however, Paul hesitates to toss the lethal weapon, as he now


recognizes that this soldier is a person probably much like himself.


This is obviously against Golding’s opinion. In the two murders that


occur in Lord of the Flies, those of Piggy and Simon, the killers do


not care about what they are doing as they are caught up in the


intense feeling of the kill. Another example of Remarque’s view of man


is the reaction of Paul to the Russian soldiers that have been


captured. He gives them cigarettes and food. He deeply sympathizes


with their situation despite being their enemy in name. This is again


an act of kindness and uncalled for altruism, something directly


against Golding’s perceptions.


As Remarque’s views of the nature of man differs form Golding, so


does his opinion about war. Unlike Golding, who feels that war is a


result of man’s natural cruelty and innate desire to hurt others,


Remarque is of the opinion that war is began because of a few people


in power, not all of humanity. At one point in All Quiet on the


Western Front one of the characters, Albert Kropp, suggests that “a


deceleration of war should be a popular festival with entrance tickets


and bands, like a bull fight. Then in the arena the ministers and


generals of the two countries, dressed in bathing drawers and armed


with clubs, can have it out among themselves.” This opinion is


reflective of Remarque’s own. While Golding concentrates only on the


underlying causes of war, Remarque goes on to explain its horrors, as


his is an anti-war novel. Remarque frequently is pointing out the


atrocities of war. While there are countless examples of this in the


novel two of the most striking are the descriptions of the dying


horses and one of the French soldiers. The description that Remarque


uses to convey the image of the dying horses is a very vivid one


intended to provoke a sense of disgust in the reader. He states, “The


belly of one is ripped open, the guts trail out. He becomes tangled in


them and falls, then he stands up again.” Remarque hopes that the


anguish of the horses, who were in no way responsible for their


situation, will earn the reader’s sympathy. The equally graphic


picture of the dying French soldier is also intended to show the


reader some of the horror of war. Remarque says, “… a blow form a


spade cleaves through his face. A second sees it and tries to run


farther, a bayonet jabs into his back.”


Remarque and Golding have differing opinions on human nature as


well as war. Golding, through the actions of his characters, attempts


to illustrate that under chaotic circumstances, removed normal society


man reverts to what his nature deems him to be, a destructive


creature. Remarque’s characters, on the other hand, manage to show


compassion and humane treatment of others despite being thrust into a


situation more terrible than that of Golding’s characters. Where


Golding feels war is a result of humankind’s vile nature, Remarque


sees it as an evil brought about by only a select few.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Author

Слов:1357
Символов:8658
Размер:16.91 Кб.