Attitudes Of Marriage In The Cantebury Tales

Essay, Research Paper

Attitudes of marriage in

Chaucer?s The Canterbury Tales

Krupa Desai

Period 3-English H IV

Ms. Saddik

May 24, 1999

Chaucer?s The Canterbury Tales, demonstrate many different attitudes and perceptions

towards marriage. Some of these ideas are very traditional, such as that illustrated in the Franklin?s Tale. On the other hand, other tales present a liberal view, such as the marriages portrayed in the Miller?s and The Wife of Bath?s tales. While several of these tales are rather comical, they do indeed depict the attitudes towards marriage at that time in history. D.W. Robertson, Jr. calls marriage “the solution to the problem of love, the force which directs the will which is in turn the source of moral action” (Robertson, 88). “Marriage in Chaucer?s time meant a union between spirit and flesh and was thus part of the marriage between Christ and the Church” (Bennett, 113). The Canterbury Tales show many abuses of this sacred bond, as will be discussed below.

One example of corruption in marriage is The Miller?s Tale. This tale includes a lecherous clerk, a vain clerk, and an old man entangled in a web of deceit and adultery construed by a married women. It is obvious in this story that almost each of these characters show complete disregard to the institution of marriage. The two men, Nicholas and Absalon, both try to engage in adulterous affairs with Alison, the old man?s wife. Both of the men are guilty of trying to seduce Alison, which shows their indifference towards the sanctions and laws of marriage. Still Alison, who should be the wiser, also breaks the laws of marriage. She takes Nicholas because she wants to, just as she ignores Absalon because she wants to. Lines 104-

109 of the Miller?s Tale show Alison?s blatant disrespect for her marriage to “Old John” and her planned deceit:

“That she hir love hym graunted atte laste,

And swoor hir ooth, by seint Thomas of Kent

That she wol been at his commandment,

Whan that she may hir leyser wel espie.

Myn housbonde is so ful of jalousie

That but ye wayte wel and been privee?”

On the contrary, Alison?s husband loved her more than his own life, although he felt foolish for marrying her since she was so young and skittish. This, in turn, led him to keep a close watch on her whenever possible. The Miller?s main point in his story is that if a man obtains what he wants from God or from his wife, he won?t ask questions or become jealous. Apparently the miller feels that the male is after his own sexual pleasure and doesn?t concern himself with how his wife uses her “privetee” as pointed out in lines 55-58:

“An housbonde shal nat been inquisityf

Of Goddes pryvetee, nor of his wyf.

So he may fynde Goddes foyson there,

Of the remenant nedeth nat enquere.”

Stories like the Miller?s tale are still popular in today?s society, those which claim that jealousy and infidelity arise from marriages between old men and beautiful young women.

Another story which contains a rather liberal point of view of marriage is The Wife of Bath?s Tale. The wife of bath clearly has a carefree attitude towards marriage. She knows that the woes of marriage are now inflicted upon women, rather, women inflict these woes upon their husbands. In setting forth her views of marriage, however, she actually proves that the opposite is true in lines 1-3 in her prologue:

“Experience, though noon auctoritee

Were in this world, is right ynough for me

To speke of wo that is in mariage?”

The wife of bath, in her prologue, proves to her own satisfaction that the miller?s perception of marriage is correct, and then declares that it is indeed acceptable for a woman to marry more than once. She claims that chastity is not necessary for a successful marriage. She also claimed that virginity is never even mentioned in the Bible, as is seen in the lengthy passage of lines 59-72 of her prologue:

“Wher can ye seye in any manere age

That hye God defended mariage

By expres word? I praye yow, telleth me.

Or where comanded he virginitee?

I woot as wel as ye, it is no drede,

Th?apostl, whan he speketh of maydenhede,

He seyde that percept therof hadde he noon:

Men may conseille a womman to been oon,

But consellyng is no comandement.

He putte it in oure owene juggement.

For hadde God comanded maydenhede

Thanne hadde he dampned wedding with the dede;

And certes, if ther were no seed ysowe,

Virginitee, thanne whereof sholde it growe?”

She later asks where virginity would come from if no one gave up their virginity. Clearly, the wife of bath?s prologue is largely an argument in defense of her multiple marriages than an attempt to prove her idea that “if society was reorganized so that women?s dominance was recognized, society would be much improved” (Wil

liams, 72). Her prologue depicts women as “a commodity to be bought and used in marriage, one whose economic and religious task was to pay the debt in a society where ?al is for to selle” (Robertson, 209). However, she claims to have control over this process. For example, her first three husbands gave her economic security in exchange for the sexual use of her body. This “degradation of sexual life” in the culture is greatly evoked, and supported by the Church?s command to “pay the debt” (Robertson, 210). The wife of bath clearly rebels against male domination with regards to her first three husbands but still accepts the ways in which she survives economically. Overall, marriage for the Wife of Bath is much more than sexual pleasure; it provides her with a “vast sense of power in the exercise of her sovereignty; it makes her feel the godlike powers which the serpent promised Eve would follow the eating of the apple?” (Rowland, 358). Through obstinacy, the wife of bath declares that a wife will achieve sovereignty in marriage, which is good for both, the wife and husband, as a women?s sovereignty provides for peace. She also

sees women as objects and commodities to be purchased, which is probably why she has such a great lack of respect for marriage.

On the other hand, The Franklin?s Tale is one story which provides a tale about a marriage where the laws of courtesy rule. For example, the knight in the tale promised his wife that he would never try to dominate her or show any form of jealousy, and at the same time he would obey any command she gave him. This is projected in lines 17-22 in The Franklin?s Tale:

“Of his free wil he swoor hire as a knight

That nevere in al his lif he day ne night

Ne shold upon hime take no maistrye

Again hir wil, ne kithe hire jalousye,

But hire obeye and folwe hir wil in al,

As any lovere to his lady shal.”

Arveragus and Dorigen?s love and respect for each other is apparent at many places throughout the course of the tale. Dorigen reciprocates his vow to her in lines 25-32 of The Franklin?s Tale:

“She thanked hym, and with ful greet humblesse

She seyde, “sire, sith of youre gentilesse

Ye profre me to have so large a reyne,

Ne wolde nevere God bitwixe us tweyne,

As in my gilt, were outher werre or strif.

Sire, I wol be your humble, twere wyf,

Have heer my trouthe, til that myn herte breste.”

Thus been bothe in quiete and in reste.”

The franklin goes on to describe the blissful happiness between Arveragus and Dorigen and goes as far as to say that married couples share a happiness that someone who isn?t married couldn?t appreciate or measure. This occurs in lines 75-77 of The Franklin?s Tale:

“Who koude telle, but he hadde wedded be,

The joye, the ese, and the properitee

That is bitwixe an housbonde and his wyf?”

However, later in the story, the couple?s happiness takes a turn for the worse when Dorigen makes a pledge of copulation to Aurelius in jest, and Arveragus makes the noble decision to make Dorigen stand by her word. While one might say the knight was foolish not to fight for his beloved Dorigen, it can be argued that he knew the value of a promise and would go to great lengths to keep his word and honor; both of these views were appreciated by the franklin.

In summation, comparing Alison?s adultery and infidelity to Dorigen?s faithful love to Arvegus and the wife of bath?s attitude toward chastity or lack thereof, we have seen Chaucer?s The Canterbury Tales portray the concept of marriages in several different ways.

Bibliography

Bennet, Henry. Chaucer and the Fifteenth Century. London: Oxford University Press,

1942. 113.

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales. The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer.

Ed. F.N. Robinson. Cambridge: Riverside Press, 1933. 19-314.

Robertson, D.W. Concepts of Pilgrimage and Marriage. Critical Essays on Chaucer?s

Canterbury Tales. Ed. M. Andrew. 1st ed. Buckingham: Open University Press,

1991. 87-210.

Rowland, Beryl. Companion to Chaucer Studies. London: Oxford University Press,

1968. 358.

Williams, George. A New View of Chaucer. Durham: Duke University Press, 1965. 72.

Works Cited