Pygmalion Essay, Research Paper
Pygmalion: Higgins’ Philosophy
Professor Higgins is seen throughout Pygmalion as a very rude man. You would expect a well-educated man, such as Higgins, to be a gentleman, however, he is far from it. Higgins believes that how you treat someone is not important, as long as you treat everyone equally.
The great secret, Eliza, is not having bad manners or good manners or any other particular sort of manners, but having the same manner for all human souls: in short, behaving as if you were in Heaven, where there are no third-class carriages, and one soul is as good as another
(Higgins, Act V)
Higgins says this to Eliza, hoping it will justify his treatment of her. This theory would be fine if Higgins always lived by it himself. However, he shows this in many different ways.
It can seen how Higgins follows this theory. He is consistently rude towards Eliza, Mrs. Pearce, and his mother. His manners are the same towards each of them, according to this philosophy of his. However the Higgins we see at the parties and in good times with Pickering is different, he is much better mannered. This apparent discrepancy between Higgins’ actions and his word may not exist, depending on the interpretation of this theory.
There are two possible translations of Higgins’ philosophy. It can be viewed as treating everyone the same all of the time or treating everyone equally at a particular time.
It is obvious that Higgins does not treat everyone equally all of the time, as witnessed by his actions when he is in “one of his states” (as Mrs. Higgins’ parlour maid calls it). The Higgins that we see in Mrs. Higgins’ parlour is not the same Higgins we see at the parties. When in “the state” Henry Higgins wanders aimlessly around the parlour, irrationally moving from chair to chair, highly unlike the calm Professor Higgins we see at the ball. Higgins does not believe that a person should have the same manner towards everyone all of the time, but that a person should treat everyone equally at a given
If the second meaning of Higgins’ theory, that he treats everyone equally at a particular time, is taken as his philosophy, there is one major flaw. Higgins never respects Eliza, no matter who is around. In Act V of Pygmalion, Eliza confronts him about his manner towards her. “He (Pickering) treats a flower girl as duchess.” Higgins, replying to Eliza, “And I treat a duchess as a flower girl.” In an attempt to justify this Higgins replies “The question is not whether I treat you rudely, but whether you ever heard me treat anyone else better.” Eliza does not answer this question but the reader knows that Higgins has treated others better than Eliza. At the parties, for example, Higgins is a gentleman to the hosts and other guest, but still treats Eliza as his “experiment.”
Higgins could never see the “new” Eliza. Higgins only saw the dirty flower girl that had become his “experiment.” Much like an author never sees a work as finished, Higgins could not view Eliza lady or duchess. Since Higgins knew where Eliza came from it was difficult for him to make her parts fit together as a masterpiece that he respected.
Part of Higgins’ problem in recognizing the “new” Eliza is his immaturity. He does not see her as what she is, he only sees her as what she was. This immaturity is representative of Higgins’ childish tendencies that the reader can see throughout the play. Higgins’ child-like actions can partially explain the variations in his philosophy. Try to imagine Higgins as a young teenager. A young Higgins, or any teenage boy for that matter, has a very limited outlook. They treat everyone the same; depending on the situation they may be little gentlemen or rude dudes. When around parents the teenager is rude and inconsiderate yet when among his friends he a complete gentleman.
The adult Higgins’ actions are the same as the child.