Women On The Street Essay, Research Paper
Women on the Street
Have you ever rushed down the street and felt that nagging feeling of
guilt, as you breeze by someone lying in a doorway? Is she alive? Is she
ill? Why do we all rush by without finding out is she’s all right?
People sit in train stations, bus stations, parks, doorways,
unmistakably sick, with what, we don’t know. All are seemingly alone.
Some beg. Some don’t. Some have open sores that ooze and bleed.
Some are drunk. Some talk to themselves or formless others. They have
no homes.
Street people make up a small percentage of the homeless
population. Most homeless people blend into the daily flow of urban life.
Many families are homeless. Many babies go from the hospital into the
shelter system, never knowing what it is like to go home. Women are
another subgroup of the homeless.
Solutions to homelessness are not easily found. But before we can
solve problems, we must be sensitive enough that we create the will to find
the solutions. Often if we do not feel the problem, if some emotional
response is not made, we are not moved to seek solutions. We are often
unmoved to even recognize the questions. We cannot afford to keep
walking by.
“Work is a fundamental condition of human existence,” said Karl Marx.
In punch-the-clock and briefcase societies no less than in agricultural or
hunting and gathering societies, it is the organization of work that makes life
in communities possible. Individual life as well as social life is closely tied to
work. In wage labored societies, and perhaps in every other as well, much
of an individual’s identity is tied to their job. For most people jobs are a
principal source of both independence and correctness to others. It should
come as no surprise that, in the work force or out, work and jobs are
important in the lives of homeless women.
There are women who want to work and do, and women who want to
work and do not. There are women who cannot work and others who
should not work and still others who do not want to work. Some work
regularly, some intermittently; some work part-time, some full-time; and
there are even those who work two jobs. At any given moment, there is a lot
of job-searching, job losing, job changing, and job avoidance. Within
months or even weeks, these may all appear in the same person.
The process is almost routine. A homeless woman registers with an
unemployment agency. Since there is no way for them to call her when a
job comes up she calls them – three, four times a day. By the third day they
usually tell her, “Don’t call us, we’ll call you.” If she confesses there is no
way to reach her, they lose interest. Although since 1985, the shelters help
reach people.
Several women reported losing their jobs or the opportunity to get
them when their homelessness became known. One women had been
working as a receptionist in a doctor’s office for several weeks when the
doctor learned she was living in a shelter and fired her. The doctor told her
if he’d known he wouldn’t have hired her, shelters are places of disease.
The jobs homeless women can get do not pay enough to enable them
to support themselves. But, the women desperately want and need the
money, the independence, and the self respect that most of us have come
to take for granted from a job. But, for women to get a job and keep it, the
women must run an obstacle course at the end of which is a low-pay, low-
status job that offers a little more than they have without it. The wome
perfectly socialized to the values of work – continue to value work for what
they know their jobs cannot provide. Even with the starts and stops, and the
periodic surrenders to a workers shelter life.
There is an importance and complex connection between family
relationships and homelessness. For the never-married women, “family”,
usually meant family of orientation – the families they were born into. For
women with children, “family”, included family of procreation – their
husbands and children. Perhaps predictably, mothers and sisters were
more likely to be sources of support than fathers and brothers. Homeless
women had not always been families. Like everyone else, they were born
into families or family-like networks of human relationships. On the street
and in the shelters, one meets many homeless women who had been kept
afloat by family members until, for one reason or another, the family had to
let go. For most women, living with relatives or receiving significant financial
or other support form them was the last stage in their descent into
homelessness. Peter Rossi reports that “the time elapsed since last being
employed is much longer than the time homeless.” (Ferrill 123). From this
is properly inferred that while they were unemployed, even for years at a
time, they now homeless persons “managed to stay in homes mainly
through the generosity of family and perhaps friends.” (Ferrill 123).
This is an ongoing process and many people continue to avoid
homelessness through the support of family members. Of course, we do
not know how many about-to-be-homeless there are, but it is reasonable to
suppose that they far out number the “real ” homeless. In New York City, it
has been estimated that the doubled-up families in public housing
outnumbered the officially homeless by 20 to 1. (Ferrill 125).
Shelters are dynamic social systems whose moods are in constant
movement. If, for a moment, the system appears to be in a steady state, it
is a balance of forces rather than a state of rest. The forces are many.
They operate at different directions. At the individual level, personalities
clash and personalities mesh, producing smaller groups within the system.
Some forces enhance group solidarity, some of which work against it, and
some of which can go either way.
It is unlikely that the staff people and shelter rules by themselves could
have contained the explosive forces of racial animosity, social class
differences, competition for resources, overcrowding, individuals who were
not always in control of their actions, and individuals who wanted to
disassociate themselves from the group. but came against these forces,
and born mainly out of shared homelessness and common needs, was a
powerful impulse to group cohesion and solidarity. Most of the time, the
impulse to solidarity was strong enough to hold the negative forces in check,
there by providing the minimum of peace and good order that made social
life possible. On many evenings, as the women came together in the
shelter, there was sufficient good feeling and fellow feelings, when coupled
with their common needs and circumstances, to allow a sense of community
to sputter into life. For most women, the loneliness of their homeless state
was a terrible burden to bear; this fragile bit of community, however small,
was precious indeed.
“Homelessness is the sum total of our dreams, policies, intentions,
errors, omissions, cruelties, kindness, all of it recorded, in the flesh, in the
life of the streets.” (Marin 41).