’s Truth Essay, Research Paper
For centuries, science fiction writers have thrilled and challenged readers with visions of the future and future worlds. These authors offered an insight into what they expected man, society, and life to be like at some future time. Though most of this insight was good, a select group of authors have tried to give readers a more realistic interpretation of the direction mankind is heading toward.
One such author, Ray Bradbury, utilized this concept in his modern classic, Fahrenheit 451, a futuristic look at a man and his role in society. Bradbury utilizes the luxuries of life in America today, in addition to various occupations and technological advances, to show what life could be like if the future continues on it s present route. He turns man’s best friend, the dog, against man, changes the role of public servants and changes the value of a person.
Aldous Huxley also uses the concept of society out of control in his science fiction novel Brave New World. Written late in his career, Brave New World also deals with man in a changed society. Huxley asks his readers to look at the role of science and literature in the future world, scared that it may be rendered useless and discarded.
But one theme that both Brave New World and Fahrenheit 451 use in common is the theme of individual discovery by refusing to accept a passive approach to life, and refusing to conform. In addition, the refusal of various methods of escape from reality is shown to be a path to discovery. In Brave New World, the main characters of Bernard
Marx and the “Savage” boy John both come to realize the faults with their own cultures. In Fahrenheit 451, Guy Montag begins to discover that things could be better in his society but, due to some uncontrollable events, his discovery proceeds much more rapidly than it would have. He is forced out on his own, away from society, to live with others like himself who think differently than the society does.
Marx, from the civilized culture, seriously questions the lack of history that his society has. He also wonders as to the lack of books, banned because they were old and did not encourage the new culture. By visiting a reservation, home of an “uncivilized” culture of savages, he is able to see first hand something of what life and society use to be like. Afterwards he returns and attempts to incorporate some of what he saw into his work as an advertising agent. As a result with this contrast with the other culture, Marx discovers more about himself as well. He is able to see more clearly the things that had always set him on edge: the promiscuity, the domination of the government and the lifelessness in which he lived.
John, often referred to as “the Savage” because he was able to leave the reservation with Marx to go to London to live with him, also has a hard time adjusting to the drastic changes. The son of two members of the modern society but born and raised on the reservation, John learned from his mother the values and the customs of the “civilized” world while living in a culture that had much different values and practices. Though his mother talked of the promiscuity that she had practiced before she was left on the reservation (she was accidentally left there while on vacation, much as Marx was) and did still practice it, John was raised, thanks to the people around him, with the belief that these actions were wrong. Seeing his mother act in a manner that obviously reflected different values greatly affected and hurt John, especially when he returned with Marx to London. John loved his mother, but he, a hybrid of the two cultures, was stuck in the middle.
These concepts, human reaction to changes in their culture and questioning of these changes, are evident throughout the book. Huxley’s characters either conform to society’s demands for uniformity or rebel and begin a process of discovery leaving nob
In Fahrenheit 451, Guy Montag, the main character, is able to see through the government and the official policies of his society. He does so by gradually beginning to question certain aspect of society which most simply accept as fact. Montag’s job as a fireman serves as a setting to show how many people passively accept the absurdity of
their society. Instead of rushing to put out fires, as firemen today do, Montag rushes to start fires, burning the books and homes of people reported to have books. This was considered by most people to be a respectable profession. But on different occasions Montag took a book out of burning homes and would from time to time read them. From
this, he begins to question the values of his society.
Montag’s marriage also serves a setting to contrast passive acceptance versus questioning of society’s values. His marriage is not the happy kind that couples today experience but more like a coexistence. He and his wife live together and he supports her, though he apparently neither loves her a great deal or expects her to love him.
This relationship and living arrangement, with its lack of love, is Bradbury’s way of showing what life could be like if people not only stop communicating but stop thinking and choosing, thus loosing control over their lives. Montag and his wife continue to live together though people in that situation today would not hesitate to terminate such a relationship. Montag’s wife apparently accepts this relationship because it is normal for the society in which she lives.
Like Brave New World, characters escaping from reality through the use of soma, Montag’s wife, and many other characters, escape through watching a sophisticated form of television.
The problem with this is that Montag’s wife takes the program as a substitute for reality. She is almost addicted to the program, much as people were with soma in Brave New World. Bradbury uses this television and it’s programs as a way of showing the escape he is worried people will look for in the future. Without actively questioning society’s values, he is concerned that people will look for ways to idly spend their time.
But like Marx, Montag chooses not to take part in this addiction. By abstaining, he can see the affects it’s use has on the people around him, much as Marx and more importantly John saw in their culture. Both authors try to show that with life made easier by strong government control and a lack of personal involvement people
will no longer spend their time thinking, questioning or developing their own ideas.
Through these various diversions from normal behavior in society, Marx, John the Savage and Guy Montag are able to see the truths behind the societies they live in and are able to learn about themselves. And though their discoveries meant that their lives would be changed forever, the authors succeeded in showing that the key to humanity lies in thinking and questioning. These men found themselves through their own discoveries, much as Bradbury and Huxley hope their readers will do.