РефератыИностранный языкThThe Infamous Watergate Scandal Essay Research Paper

The Infamous Watergate Scandal Essay Research Paper

The Infamous Watergate Scandal Essay, Research Paper


“The Watergate Complex is a series of modern buildings with


balconies that looks like filed down Shark’s Teeth” (Gold, 1).


Located on the Potomac River in Washington, D.C. it contains many


hotel rooms and offices. What happened in the complex on June 17,


1972 early in the morning became a very historical event for our


nation that no one will ever forget.


The “Watergate Scandal” and constitutional crisis that began on


June 17, 1972 with the arrest of five burglars who broke into the


Democratic National Committee (DMC) headquarters at the Watergate


office building in Washington D.C. It ended with the registration of


President Richard M. Nixon on August 9, 1974. (Watergate)


At approximately 2:30 in the morning of June 17, 1972 five men


were arrested at the Watergate Complex. The police seized a walkie


talkie, 40 rolls of unexposed film, two 35 millimeter cameras, lock


picks, pensized teargas guns, and bugging devices. (Gold, 75)


These five men and two co-plotters were indicated in September


1972 on charges of burglary, conspiracy and wire tapping. Four months


later they were convicted and sentenced to prison terms by District


Court Judge John J. Sercia was convinced that relevant details had


not been unveiled during the trial and offered leniency in exchanged


for further information. As it became increasingly evident that the


Watergate burglars were tied closely to the Central Intelligence


Agency and the Committee to re-elect the president. (Watergate)


Four of these men, that were arrested on the morning of June 17, 1972,


came from Miami, Florida. They were Bernard L. Barker, Frank A.


Sturgis, Virgillio R. Gonzalez, and Eugenio R. Martinez. The other


man was from Rockville, Maryland named James W. McCord, Jr. The two


co-plotters were G. Gordon Liddy and E. Howard Hunt. (Watergate)


The senate established and investigative committee headed by


Senate Sam Ervin, Jr., to look into the growing scandal. As they were


investigating, they related that the famous break-in was far more


involved than what everyone had expected. (Watergate) The White Houses


involvement of that morning first became evident when James McCord


wrote a letter to Judge Sirca. In this letter McCord explained that


he wanted to disclose the details of Watergate. He made it apparent


that he would not speak to a Justice department official of an FBI


agent. Although his letter did unveil details, it made server


chargers. McCord justified that “Political pressure” (Westerfled 36)


had generated many defendants to plead guilty and remain silent. He


also claimed that there had been whiteness at the trail who had


committed perjury in order to protect the people who headed the


brake-in. McCord declared that he, his family, and his friend may be


in danger if he spoke out. (Westerfled 36-37)


The Senate Watergate Committee saw their chance to unravel the


mystery of this scandal. The offered James McCord a chance to speak


publicly. In his first meeting with representatives of this committee


he named two more people that he claimed were involved in the burglary


and cover-up. Theses two men were John Dean and Jeb Margruder.


Margruder was the second-in-charge of the CRP and Dean was a White


House aid. After hearing these substantial accusations the Senate


Watergate Committee promptly subpoenaed John Dean and Jeb Margruder.


(Westerfled 37-38).


After the next session with James McCord he took the whiteness


stand and explained how Liddy had promised him an executive pardon if


he would plead guilty. This began to question the a White House


involvement since only the president could present such a pardon.


(Westerfled, 40) Jeb Margruder was the next witness to testify. He


admitted his own perjury to the Grand Jury and verified what McCord


had said. While on the stand he also revealed another name to add to


the list of those involved, John Mitchell. (Gold, 246-247)


The next witness scheduled to appear was John Dean. In Dean’s


testimony he exposed that the Watergate burglary had been only a part


of a greater abuse of power. He said that for four years the White


House had used the powers of the presidency to attack political


enemies. They spied on and harassed anyone who did not agree with


Nixon’s policies. If a reporter wrote stories criticizing the White


House they would be singled out for tax investigations. The White


House also kept an “Enemies List” (Westerfled 43) of people that the


presidents men wanted revenge on. After being fired, dean kept


official documents that supported his statements. (Westerfled 43-44;


Gold 309-330)


John Dean said, is his opening statements, that he had discussed


the cover-up with president Nixon in several meetings. At the first


meeting, in September 1972, he told the president how he and other


members of the White House had handled the cover-up so far. Dean


claimed that in another important meeting with Nixon, on March 21,


1973, the president agreed $1 million should be raised to silence the


burgalers. However Dean said that he dealt with the president mostly


through H.R. Haldman and John Ehrlichman. (Gold 266-308; Westerfled


43)


Dean faced the committee for four days of Questioning, after his


opening statement. During these four days the republicans focused on


what happened in these meetings between Dean and the president, which


was the only evidence the president. The question that Senator baker


asked and was being wondered throughout the nation was, what did the


president know and when did he know it? (Westerfled, 43) The Nixon


administration tackled Dean’s reports of the two meetings. They


claimed that the March 21, 1973 meeting was the first Nixon had heard


of the cover-ups. The White House’s version was they the president


had rejected the burglars’ blackmail. (Hearings 02)


For the first time in this intriguing scandal the president


himself had been accused. This was the greatest blow the Nixon White


House had sustained. “polls showed that 70 percent of TV viewers


believed Deans version of the event” (Westerfled, 43). But who was to


be believed? It was John Deans Word against Richard Nixon’s. (Gold


669-670; Westerfled, 43) The committee then made a shocking discovery,


only a few weeks after Deans testimony. As the committee was managing


a routine aid, they asked him how the White House administration came


up with their version of what happened in the meeting s of Dena and


Nixon. His response was that the meetings had probably been recorded


on tape. (Westerfled 43)


Alexander Butterflied explained that the White House had been


equipped with a recording system. They were installed in his two


offices, the Oval Room “The taping device was spring load to a voice


actuation situation.” (Gold 436) In Alexander Butterfields

testimony


he said that the recording system was installed to help preserve all


documents. The only people who knew of these recording devices were


the president, Haledman, Kigbe, Butterfield, and the secret service


people. (Gold 434-442)


Now the committee had stumbled across exactly what they were


looking for, a way to prove the presidents innocence of guilt. The


tapes of the meeting s between Dean and Nixon were lying some where in


the White House. These tapes would show which of these men were lying


and if the president of the united States had been involved in a


criminal conspiracy. Although when the senate asked him for the tapes


the President refused, but why?


On July 17, 1973 the Senate Committee went directly to the


president about their request. Congress wanted the tapes of all the


important meetings. President Nixon refused. The Committee decided


to subpoena the tapes that afternoon. (Westerfled 45) On the same day,


July 17, 1973, special Prosecutor Archibald Cox had also subpoenaed


the tapes. He declared that they were significant for the grand


jury’s criminal investigation. This was the first time anyone had


ever subpoenaed the president of the United States, and Nixon has two


subpoenas in one day. Although the White House claimed that neither


Congress nor the special prosecutor had the right to demand evidence


from the executive branch and refused to obey. (Westerfled 45)


This started a powerful struggle. The Senate Committee wondered


if they could find the president in contempt of congress which would


be a serious legal charge. But they didn’t know who would be a


serious legal charge. But they didn’t know who would arrest him since


the president controlled the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the


Armed Forces. The committee had to think quick and come up with


another way to get the tapes. Cox and the grand jury was going to sue


for the tapes in federal court. The committee decided to follow the


special prosecutor’s lead. (Westerfled 43) Both lawsuits went to Judge


John Sirca, the same judge who presided the trials of the Watergate


burglars. Judge Sirca charged the president to turn over the tapes to


the special prosecutor. When the White House Appealed the decision


the case went to the Federal Court of appeals. (Westerfled 43)


Another scandal in the White House shocked the nation. The Department


of Justice announced that they had been investigating Vice President


Spiro T. Anew for taking large bribes in return for government


contracts. He then resigned from office October 10, 1973. (Westerfled


47)


On October 15, 1973 the court of appeals sustained Judge Sirca’s


ruling and demanded that the president give the subpoenaed tapes to


the Special Prosecutor, Archibald Cox. Nixon ordered Cox not to


subpoena any more tapes, although Cox said he would do so. Cox also


told him that if he refused he would find him in contempt of the


court. (Westerfled 45) Nixon was beyond furious. Cox was a employee


of the executive branch and questioning the authority of the


president. Nixon ordered Richardson’s deputy attorney general William


D. Ruckelshavs to fire Cox. He also refused and was fired. The


third-ranking Justice Department official, Solicitor General Robert H.


Bork, was now acting as Attorney General. He agreed to fire Cox.


This event was called the “Saturday Massacre.” (Westerfled 48)


The nation raged in anger. So Nixon agreed to hand the tapes


over to Sirca’s court and appoint a new Special Prosecutor. The new


prosecutor was Leon Jaworski. Jaworski was a very well known lawyer


and accepted the offer on the one condition that Nixon could not fire


him. (Westerfled 48-49) As the presidents lawyers were going over the


tapes preparing them for the special prosecutor they made an alarming


discovery. During a conversation between Nixon and Haldman there was


an 18-minute gap. This made the nation lose even more faith in their


president. (Westerfled 49)


On April 11, 1974 Special Prosecutor Jaworski demanded the White


House turn over 69 more tapes. Once again the Supreme Court ruled


that Nixon had to supply the subpoenaed tapes. (Westerfled 51-54)


“On July 27-30, the House Judiciary Committee, whose public hearings


had disclosed evidence of illegal White house activities, recommended


that Nixon be impeached on three charges: obstruction of Justice,


abuse of presidential power, and trying to impede the impeachment


process by defying committee subpoenas.” (Watergate) Millions of


people watched the committee vote on television. There were


twenty-seven votes for the impeachment and only eleven against it. He


was accused of misuse of his authority and also violating the


constitutional rights of citizens by ordering the FBI and Secret


Services to spy on American citizens. The last thing he was charged


with was refusing to obey congress’s subpoenas. Nixon had broken his


oath to up hold the law. (Watergate)


With the impeachment vote against him, Nixon would have to stand


trial before the U.S. senate. Two-thirds of the senate would have to


vote for impeaching the president. Nixon would be removed from


office. (Westerfled 46) On August 5, 1974 the White House released an


overdue transcript of the tapes. The recording was from June 23,


1972, only a week after the break-in. This tape told how Nixon


ordered Haldeman to tell the CIA to cease the FBI”s investigation of


Watergate. These tapes made it clear that Nixon was involved in the


cover-up from the beginning. (Westerfled 56)


At nine o’clock August 8, 1974 Nixon made his last speech as


president Richard M. Nixon. He only admitted loosing the support he


had from Congress. He said “I have never been a quitter, to leave


office before my term is complete is abhorrent to ever instinct in my


body. But, as president, I must put the interest of America first.


America needs a full-time president and a full-time Congress.


Therefore, In shall resign the presidency effective at noon tomorrow.”


(Westerfled 57)


The next morning Nixon addressed a tearful White House staff.


He then boarded a helicopter and began his journey home to San


Clemente, California. (Westerfled 57) At noon the Vice President,


Gerald R. Ford, was inaugurated. He became the thirty-seventh


president of the United States. He told the American people in his


first speech “Our long national nightmare is over.” (Westerfled 57)



Bibliography


Gold, Gerald ed. Watergate hearings. New York: Bantam books, 1978.


Westerfled, Scott. Watergate. Englewood Cliffs: Silber Burdett,


1991.


“Watergate”. Grolier Electronic Publishing. 1992.


The New grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia. Danbury, CT: Grolier


Electronic Publising Inc., 1993.


Microsoft Encarta. Microsoft Corporation: Funk & Wagnalls


Corporation, 1993.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: The Infamous Watergate Scandal Essay Research Paper

Слов:2411
Символов:16479
Размер:32.19 Кб.