Truth: Ideas Which Reflect Personal Belief Essay, Research Paper
J. Douglas Boyd 11/4/99
Society, Literature, and Truth Period 5
Truth: Ideas Which Reflect Personal Belief
When a writer composes a piece of literature, his sole task should be to convey
the truth of the subject matter he is discussing, no matter what the medium of his writing
may be. A truthful idea for me is authenticated by my own, personal beliefs, but not one
idea can be truthful to all. Sophocles, George Orwell, Joseph Conrad, and W.H. Auden,
share what they believe to be truthful ideas with their audiences. Through a writers
ability to verbalize ideas, and with the use of their personal writing style, what is truthful
to that writer can be conveyed to that writers audience, it is up to the audience to decide
whether what the writer believes to be truthful is truthful to them.
Sophocles was a great teller of truth. This is shown to me in his plays Oedipus
and Antigone, Sophocles was able to put into words the true feelings of desperation
one may feel. Both Creon, from Antigone, and Oedipus were shown the truth of what
their lives have come to, for Creon, his poor judgment management led to the death of
some of his loved ones. Oedipus dealt with the horrid realization that his belief in the
idea that he was the controller of his own fate, was false, and that the oracle was correct.
Both of these tragic figures did not fully understand the drastic effects of what they had
brought upon themselves. I, at times, demonstrate some of Creon s poor judgment, and
lack of priority management. From what I accept as true from Sophocles tale, I learned
that I should think things through so as not to do anything that could later be detrimental.
Many people believe in fate, I personally do not, but I do believe in misery, and if
someone brings it upon themselves, they must deal with it accordingly, by whatever
means necessary. On occasion, I do some things that take less brain power than your
average bear, so to speak, and either bring myself to mild shame, or some other sort of
grief. Although I may not accept a main idea of Sophocles Oedipus Rex as truthful, I
do find that punishing myself can be more fruitful and result procuring than having
someone scoff in my face, or have someone else allot me a punishment.
George Orwell is another great writer who uses a unique style to show what he
believes as being truthful, and it just so happens that I agree with some of his truths. In
his short story, Shooting An Elephant, Orwell demonstrates the truth that, pardon my
French, the masses are asses, and the power of group pressure can be so overwhelming
it makes one exercise acts they would normally disapprove of. It is clear to see that
Orwell objects to killing the elephant, and he has reasons as to why the elephant should
not be killed. He reasons with himself, and the pressure of the natives causes him to act
restlessly, and kill the elephant. This killing could have avoided completely, had the
element of peer pressure been removed. I know that when I am given time, reasonable
cause to act or not act, and little outside pressure, I tend to act as wisely as I am able to.
When I am influenced by outside forces, I tend to act recklessly, and self preservation
takes a back-seat to doing what everyone expects of me, to act like an immature
seventeen year old male. In another example of Orwell s writing, Politics and the
English Language, he illustrates what I believe is going to lead to the downfall of
literature and all writing in general. It seems as though he poking fun at snotty professors
and politicians who use tremendous words to explain even the most trivial ideas, many of
these people incorporate several adjectives and nouns, with one verb in a sixty-seven
syllable sentence, containing eight words. So many, too many, politicians, professors,
and self righteous people with expanded vocabularies tend to commit these acts, and will
make our language quite pathetic and unusable. It is my own belief that the English
language will soon accompany Latin and Sanskrit in the dead language category. I am in
full agreement with Orwell in the truth of this matter, and in all honesty I think it is a dire
matter, and should be corrected. With the use of the style lacking, overwhelming
sentences, no point is reached, an author of these types of ideas or writings arrives at
vague answers, and does not do any convincing except convincing me that they are a
walking, talking, excellent-at-memorizing, Thesaurus. I find that Orwell writes with
great style, and tends to reach a conclusion, his words flow, his sentences form mind
expanding conclusions, and I agree with his idea that the English language is slowly, but
surely deteriorating.
The English language is becoming so easy to manipulate, even those who learn it
as a second language late in their lives are able to exploit it. Joseph Conrad, author of
An Outpost of Progress, has been able to absorb some of the common traits of writers
that I despise. Although I agree with some of his ideas and find them truthful, I cannot
agree with his writing style, or lack thereof. Conrad brings up a good point, that when a
man is brought up in what modern man has understood to be civilization, he is helpless if
he needs to return to the wilderness. I find that somewhat truthful, man has developed
things called morals and social norms, and has traded instinct and survival for those
things. Man is no longer suited for crude living, natural living, his appendix is no longer
useful for digesting tough materials, he must work to develop a callous, instead of having
one naturally form from constant use of his hands. I do agree with Conrad in that
everything that builds up a modern man, and gives him confidence, comes from the
society in which he lives, not from himself. People compare themselves to assume their
standing in society, we have All-State athletic competitions, and world renowned
musicians, never could one find someone who is hard working enough to survive in the
wilderness for thirty years, today, one would ask themselves, Why would anyone want
to do that? Conrad, although wordy and showy of this new language he has learned,
conveys some ideas I think about all the time, and he has offered some more ideas for me
to consider, although I doubt, and hope that I do not find a conclusion, rather I would
appreciate not knowing all the answers, and maybe I will be able to learn something new.
The Unknown Citizen is a poem written by W.H. Auden, and I find so many
truths behind what is said, I can only hope that it justifies my reasoning. It appears that
W.H. Auden rejects the ideas of becoming a conformist. I feel that conformity is a
terrible thing, and that one should be free to explore their ideas and opinions, but should
sometimes be centered so as not to become crazy. Line 9 of this poem reads …he
wasn t…odd in his views, from what I understand of my past schooling, poetry is written
for the poet to reflect, and the reader to interpret. I tend to apply poetry to my own real
life situations. I feel line is expressing that this Unknown Citizen has never had an
original thought, which I believe is a wretched thing, if what I think Auden is saying is
what they are saying, this person will die miserably, accepting what he is told. Without
an original thought there is no need for a brain, other than to spew out whatever vileness
has been forced upon a person throughout their life in traditional school. Auden seems to
have hit the nail on the head, and I find that this poem is the epitome of what society
should attempt to conclude. I found this poem to be full of inescapable truths, and
although I disagree with some of society s decisions, I know that I am a product of the
state, and can only hope that the educational conveyer belt I am riding will help me
become an original person.
Originality is key to become a full, thoughtful person, and through good, thoughtful,
wholesome literature, one can draw from a wide array of ideas to consider truthful, and
to adopt and utilize throughout their lives. Sophocles, Auden, Orwell, and Conrad are
very good at conveying ideas they believe as truthful. One must fully understand an idea
of someone else, before they can fully accept that idea as truthful. I do not fully
understand every aspect of every idea of each of the aforementioned authors, but of the
ideas I do understand, I find that most are truthful. Oedipus and Creon s sufferings, and
Orwell s inability to act as a self, not as a group. Conrad s idea that man has taken
himself too far from his origins to ever survive in the wilderness, and Auden s knowledge
of man s adaptation to each other, and thereby reducing the ability to conjure up any
original ideology. I found that my weaknesses are not my own, that they have existed in
the times of the writers of the past, and will exist throughout time. The weaknesses of
man are timeless, and that weakness is man s constant ability to make mistakes, but
reflect on them through other people making the same mistakes, and finding truth in that.