РефератыИностранный языкTrTruth Ideas Which Reflect Personal Belief

Truth Ideas Which Reflect Personal Belief

Truth: Ideas Which Reflect Personal Belief Essay, Research Paper


J. Douglas Boyd 11/4/99


Society, Literature, and Truth Period 5


Truth: Ideas Which Reflect Personal Belief


When a writer composes a piece of literature, his sole task should be to convey


the truth of the subject matter he is discussing, no matter what the medium of his writing


may be. A truthful idea for me is authenticated by my own, personal beliefs, but not one


idea can be truthful to all. Sophocles, George Orwell, Joseph Conrad, and W.H. Auden,


share what they believe to be truthful ideas with their audiences. Through a writers


ability to verbalize ideas, and with the use of their personal writing style, what is truthful


to that writer can be conveyed to that writers audience, it is up to the audience to decide


whether what the writer believes to be truthful is truthful to them.


Sophocles was a great teller of truth. This is shown to me in his plays Oedipus


and Antigone, Sophocles was able to put into words the true feelings of desperation


one may feel. Both Creon, from Antigone, and Oedipus were shown the truth of what


their lives have come to, for Creon, his poor judgment management led to the death of


some of his loved ones. Oedipus dealt with the horrid realization that his belief in the


idea that he was the controller of his own fate, was false, and that the oracle was correct.


Both of these tragic figures did not fully understand the drastic effects of what they had


brought upon themselves. I, at times, demonstrate some of Creon s poor judgment, and


lack of priority management. From what I accept as true from Sophocles tale, I learned


that I should think things through so as not to do anything that could later be detrimental.


Many people believe in fate, I personally do not, but I do believe in misery, and if


someone brings it upon themselves, they must deal with it accordingly, by whatever


means necessary. On occasion, I do some things that take less brain power than your


average bear, so to speak, and either bring myself to mild shame, or some other sort of


grief. Although I may not accept a main idea of Sophocles Oedipus Rex as truthful, I


do find that punishing myself can be more fruitful and result procuring than having


someone scoff in my face, or have someone else allot me a punishment.


George Orwell is another great writer who uses a unique style to show what he


believes as being truthful, and it just so happens that I agree with some of his truths. In


his short story, Shooting An Elephant, Orwell demonstrates the truth that, pardon my


French, the masses are asses, and the power of group pressure can be so overwhelming


it makes one exercise acts they would normally disapprove of. It is clear to see that


Orwell objects to killing the elephant, and he has reasons as to why the elephant should


not be killed. He reasons with himself, and the pressure of the natives causes him to act


restlessly, and kill the elephant. This killing could have avoided completely, had the


element of peer pressure been removed. I know that when I am given time, reasonable


cause to act or not act, and little outside pressure, I tend to act as wisely as I am able to.


When I am influenced by outside forces, I tend to act recklessly, and self preservation


takes a back-seat to doing what everyone expects of me, to act like an immature


seventeen year old male. In another example of Orwell s writing, Politics and the


English Language, he illustrates what I believe is going to lead to the downfall of


literature and all writing in general. It seems as though he poking fun at snotty professors


and politicians who use tremendous words to explain even the most trivial ideas, many of


these people incorporate several adjectives and nouns, with one verb in a sixty-seven


syllable sentence, containing eight words. So many, too many, politicians, professors,


and self righteous people with expanded vocabularies tend to commit these acts, and will


make our language quite pathetic and unusable. It is my own belief that the English


language will soon accompany Latin and Sanskrit in the dead language category. I am in


full agreement with Orwell in the truth of this matter, and in all honesty I think it is a dire


matter, and should be corrected. With the use of the style lacking, overwhelming


sentences, no point is reached, an author of these types of ideas or writings arrives at


vague answers, and does not do any convincing except convincing me that they are a


walking, talking, excellent-at-memorizing, Thesaurus. I find that Orwell writes with

p>

great style, and tends to reach a conclusion, his words flow, his sentences form mind


expanding conclusions, and I agree with his idea that the English language is slowly, but


surely deteriorating.


The English language is becoming so easy to manipulate, even those who learn it


as a second language late in their lives are able to exploit it. Joseph Conrad, author of


An Outpost of Progress, has been able to absorb some of the common traits of writers


that I despise. Although I agree with some of his ideas and find them truthful, I cannot


agree with his writing style, or lack thereof. Conrad brings up a good point, that when a


man is brought up in what modern man has understood to be civilization, he is helpless if


he needs to return to the wilderness. I find that somewhat truthful, man has developed


things called morals and social norms, and has traded instinct and survival for those


things. Man is no longer suited for crude living, natural living, his appendix is no longer


useful for digesting tough materials, he must work to develop a callous, instead of having


one naturally form from constant use of his hands. I do agree with Conrad in that


everything that builds up a modern man, and gives him confidence, comes from the


society in which he lives, not from himself. People compare themselves to assume their


standing in society, we have All-State athletic competitions, and world renowned


musicians, never could one find someone who is hard working enough to survive in the


wilderness for thirty years, today, one would ask themselves, Why would anyone want


to do that? Conrad, although wordy and showy of this new language he has learned,


conveys some ideas I think about all the time, and he has offered some more ideas for me


to consider, although I doubt, and hope that I do not find a conclusion, rather I would


appreciate not knowing all the answers, and maybe I will be able to learn something new.


The Unknown Citizen is a poem written by W.H. Auden, and I find so many


truths behind what is said, I can only hope that it justifies my reasoning. It appears that


W.H. Auden rejects the ideas of becoming a conformist. I feel that conformity is a


terrible thing, and that one should be free to explore their ideas and opinions, but should


sometimes be centered so as not to become crazy. Line 9 of this poem reads …he


wasn t…odd in his views, from what I understand of my past schooling, poetry is written


for the poet to reflect, and the reader to interpret. I tend to apply poetry to my own real


life situations. I feel line is expressing that this Unknown Citizen has never had an


original thought, which I believe is a wretched thing, if what I think Auden is saying is


what they are saying, this person will die miserably, accepting what he is told. Without


an original thought there is no need for a brain, other than to spew out whatever vileness


has been forced upon a person throughout their life in traditional school. Auden seems to


have hit the nail on the head, and I find that this poem is the epitome of what society


should attempt to conclude. I found this poem to be full of inescapable truths, and


although I disagree with some of society s decisions, I know that I am a product of the


state, and can only hope that the educational conveyer belt I am riding will help me


become an original person.


Originality is key to become a full, thoughtful person, and through good, thoughtful,


wholesome literature, one can draw from a wide array of ideas to consider truthful, and


to adopt and utilize throughout their lives. Sophocles, Auden, Orwell, and Conrad are


very good at conveying ideas they believe as truthful. One must fully understand an idea


of someone else, before they can fully accept that idea as truthful. I do not fully


understand every aspect of every idea of each of the aforementioned authors, but of the


ideas I do understand, I find that most are truthful. Oedipus and Creon s sufferings, and


Orwell s inability to act as a self, not as a group. Conrad s idea that man has taken


himself too far from his origins to ever survive in the wilderness, and Auden s knowledge


of man s adaptation to each other, and thereby reducing the ability to conjure up any


original ideology. I found that my weaknesses are not my own, that they have existed in


the times of the writers of the past, and will exist throughout time. The weaknesses of


man are timeless, and that weakness is man s constant ability to make mistakes, but


reflect on them through other people making the same mistakes, and finding truth in that.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Truth Ideas Which Reflect Personal Belief

Слов:1729
Символов:10645
Размер:20.79 Кб.