РефератыИностранный языкShShould Juveniles Be Tried As A Essay

Should Juveniles Be Tried As A Essay

, Research Paper


Adult Crimes Deserve Adult Treatment


Thursday, May 21, 1998. In Springfield, Oregon, 15-year old Kip Kinkel opened fire in the cafeteria


of Thurston High School. Two were killed and 25 others were wounded. Tuesday, March 24, 1998. In


Jonesboro, Arkansas, 11-year old Andrew Golden and 13-year old Mitchell Johnson pulled the fire


alarm and shot at the students filing out of the school. Five were killed and ten were wounded.


Monday, Dec. 1, 1997. In Paducah, Kentucky, 14-year old Michael Carneal pulled out a pistol and


began firing on a student prayer group. Three were killed and five others were wounded.


These incidents are only a tiny sample of the school shootings that have been committed by juvniles


in the United States. More shootings have happenned in Onalaska, Washington; Johnston, Rhode


Island; Endinboro, Pennsylvania; St. Charles, Missouri … the list continues on and on, not to mention


Columbine!


Lynbrook junior Stephanie Tsai disagrees with this saying, “At the age of 18, teens are allowed to


vote because people believe that by that age they can think rationally and sensibally. Until kids are


18, they cannot be held responsible for their actions.” Let’s examine this age 18 issue more closely …


Granted, our or society does give juvniles the right to vote at age 18. However, many states give them


the right to drive at age 16 and the right to drink at age 21. The fact is that declaring an 18 year-old an


adult is an arbitrary standard to determine maturity as far as prosecuting crime goes.


The juvenile court system was orginially implemented to protect juveniles from the “harsh” adult


court, for juvenile criminals were thought to be more mentally “immature” than adults. This may very


well be if we were speaking of a 6 year-old. However, 17 year-olds classify as juveniles as well. Ar

e


we to say that 17 year-olds are significantly more “immature” and should “not be held rsponsible for


their actions” than that of an adult 18-year old? I wonder……..


Furthermore, if our justice system uses mental incompetency as the reason juveniles have their own


separate and more lenient court, why aren’t 40 year-olds with the mind of a 10 year-old prosecuted in


the juvenile justice system? Are they not mentally “immature” as well?


An incorrect assumption about this controversial matter is if the juvenile were to be prosecuted in the


adult court, he would be condemned with an adult sentence. The same goes for juvniles. If a 15 year-


old were truly mentally immature, the adult justice system would take that fact into account of its


decision and ruling.


While others may argue that the juvenile justice system has the juvenile’s best interests in mind,


basic freedoms such as due process are denied in the juvenile courts. While those prosecuted


in adult courts are entitled to a jury, juvenile sentences usually lay in the hands of an individual judge.


The simple fact is that fully competent and mature juveniles are fully capable of committing the same


crime as a competent adult. The results of the crime are the same. In burglary, an innocent person was


robbed of his posessions. In murder, an innocent person was robbed of his life. As Katrina Ng, Santa


Clara University freshman answered, “If they commit the adult crimes, they should pay the adult


consequences. It’s not as if they don’t know the difference between right and wrong.”


And even in the extreme cases where right and wrong were indistinguishable to the immature


juvenile, the adult justice system would be better equipped to prosecute him, allowing for mitigating


circumstances and giving due process. This way, justice is best achieved–on both sides.

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Should Juveniles Be Tried As A Essay

Слов:653
Символов:4232
Размер:8.27 Кб.