РефератыИностранный языкTaTake Home Questions Essay Research Paper Sociology

Take Home Questions Essay Research Paper Sociology

Take Home Questions Essay, Research Paper


Sociology 103 Take Home Questions


1.Ethnic stratification is a rank order of groups, each made up of people with


presumed common cultural or physical characteristics interacting in patterns of dominance


and subordination. To begin with, all systems of ethnic stratification are products of the


contact of previously separated groups. Initial contact may be in the form of conquest,


annexation, voluntary immigration, or involuntary immigration. Following contact, groups


engage in competition, view one another ethnocentrically, and, ultimately, one imposes its


superior power over the others, emerging as the dominant group. Ethnic stratification


systems are created by the movement of people across national boundaries, usually


bringing with them different languages and cultural systems, or by the establishment of


new political boundaries. Multiethnic societies are formed through one or a combination


of several contact patterns. The first factor critical to the emergence of ethnic


stratification or inequality is Conquest. Conquest is a form of contact in which people of


one society subdue all or part of another society and take on the role of the dominant


group. European colonialism of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries best exemplifies


this pattern. The next factor to the emergence of ethnic stratification is Annexation. It is


a political occurrence in which a part or possibly all of one society is incorporated into


another. If a gathered society has a dominant group, then the ethnic groups within that


society become subordinate at the point that sovereignty is transferred. Such annexation


may occur in a peaceful or a violent manner. Following annexation, the most common


patterns by which ethnic groups come into contact involve immigration. The immigration


of peoples from one society to another may be either voluntary or involuntary. The chief


source of ethnic heterogeneity in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand


has been voluntary immigration. The chief objective of people who emigrate from their


home society is ordinarily economic betterment though sometimes political or religious


considerations play an important role. Demographers who study migration patterns refer


to factors of ?push and pull? that motivate people to leave their original society and


migrate to one that promises improved conditions of life. The ?pull? happens in times of


economic hardship, people will be encouraged to emigrate if they perceive more favorable


economic opportunities in another society. Depressed economic conditions, involving


minimal job opportunities and low wages, along with a low expectation of betterment of


such conditions, constitute the ?push?. Additional push factors were the increase in


evictions by landlords and the unlikelihood of any major political changes that would have


improved the economic situation. On the pull side, the most appealing societies were


those in need of unskilled labor, like the United States and Canada, which were then in the


primary stages of industrialization. Finally, Involuntary immigration involves the forced


transfer of peoples from one society to another. Such forced movements are best


exemplified by the slave trade of the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries,


which brought millions of blacks from Africa to work the cotton and sugar plantations of


the United States, Brazil, and the West Indies.


Lieberson?s theory is that the nature by which diverse ethnic groups initially meet


has been shown to be a critical factor in explaining the emergence of ethnic inequality and


the specific patterns it subsequently takes. He distinguishes two major types of contact


situations. The first type, migrant superordination, is illustrated by various colonial


conquests in which a technologically and organizationally more powerful migrant group


subdues the native population. The second, indigenous superordination, is characteristic


of most voluntary and involuntary immigrations such as those to North America; in these


cases, the arriving groups are initially made subordinate to a resident dominant group.


Lieberson maintains that long-term conflict is more likely in societies where the indigenous


population at initial contact is subordinate. Native groups less powerful than the arriving


colonials are left with few options other than resistance to the new social order imposed


on them. This hostility is further strengthened when the conquering group, over time,


becomes itself an indigenous group. It is the relative power of the migrant and indigenous


groups that determines the eventual nature of ethnic stratification in each of these


situations. Where an invading group is successful in dominating the native population, the


political and economic systems of the new group are imposed, and warfare and general


conflict are likely to result quickly. Situations in which the native group wields greater


power and immigrant groups enter as subordinates produce less overt conflict initially.


The indigenous group retains control over the size and character of immigration and may


encourage quick assimilation, as in the case of most European immigrants to the United


States. Furthermore, conflict is diminished by the fact that if the immigration is voluntary,


dissatisfied immigrants may return to their society of origin.


Although the nature of initial group contact my be important in giving rise to and


shaping the eventual system of ethnic stratification, Donald Noel has pointed three


additional factors in 1968. They are ethnocentrism, competition for scarce societal


resources, and an unequal distribution of power. On initial contact, divergent groups will


judge each other in terms of their own culture, ethnocentrically. Given the nature of


ethnocentrism, these evaluations will usually be negative. The negative judgments will


depend on the degree of difference between the groups: The more dissimilar they are, the


more negative the judgment. When culturally dissimilar groups meet, then, ethnocentrism


can be expected to typify intergroup attitudes. However, ethnocentrism alone is not


sufficient to produce ethnic stratification. Groups may view one another negatively


without the necessary emergence of dominant-subordinate relations among them. An


additional prerequisite is competition, structured along ethnic lines. Noel poses that the


more intense the competition, the greater the likelihood of the emergence of ethnic


stratification. When groups strive for the same scarce resources, their interrelations take


on the characteristics of competition and conflict. Within the competitive arena, those


groups with the greatest capacity to adapt to the social and physical environment will end


up higher in the ethnic hierarchy. Differential power among the various groups is the final


prerequisite for the development of ethnic stratification. Unless one can overpower


another, there is no basis for a stable rank order of ethnic groups, even if there is


competition and ethnocentrism among them. When there is a particularly wide power gap


between competing and ethnocentric groups, the emergent stratification system is likely to


be quite durable. Power breeds more power and once established, the dominant group


uses its power to obstruct the competition of other groups and to solidify dominance. In


the end, differential power among the various groups is the most critical of the


requirements for the emergence of ethnic stratification. Noel?s theory postulates that


competition for scarce resources provides the motivation for stratification, ethnocentrism


channels this competition along ethnic lines, and differential power determines whether


one group will be able to subordinate others.


32d

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Take Home Questions Essay Research Paper Sociology

Слов:1244
Символов:9051
Размер:17.68 Кб.