The Pharmacology And Biochemistry Of Depression Essay, Research Paper
Depression is a mental state which along with mania is classed as an affective disorder and can be defined as a pathological moodstate. Depression is usually phasic and is characterised by a return to normality during remission. Classification of depressive orders is very difficult because the disorders are heterogeneous and the symptoms range from mild to severe and can overlap with those of anxiety, schizophrenia and personality disorders. Generally two main types of depression are recognised; bipolar and unipolar. With unipolar depression, the origins of the illness are unknown and there may be periods of normality. Another type of Unipolar depression has been identified as ‘reactive depression’ and is generally related to environmental circumstances such as bereavement and changes in financial circumstance and is not usually treated with drugs. With bipolar depression or manic-depressive psychosis, there is an oscillation between depression and mania though, again there are bouts of normality. The discovery of antidepressant drugs resulted in various monoamine hypotheses of depression. The role of the catecholamines (noradrenaline and dopamine) was emphasised as the cause of depressive and manic disorders. (eg Bunney and Davis 1965, Schildkraut 1965,1978, Schildkraut and Kety 1967). It was proposed that deficiency of catecholamines, especially noradrenaline was associated with some depressions and an excess of catecholamines was associated with mania. It was discovered that many antidepressant drugs increase the availability of catecholamines at receptor sites, drugs such as the tricyclics and related antidepressants block presynaptic reuptake of catecholamines and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) decrease their deamination resulting in increased amounts available for release. It was also noted that drugs such as amphetamine release catecholamines which have a temporary antidepressant effect and causes euphoria in non depressive people, though it tends to aggravate mania. How dopaminergic activity is related to depression is still uncertain. As in post mortem studies of depressive suicides no changes in brain dopamine concentrations have been found. However drugs which increase dopaminergic activity, for example amphetamine and L-Dopa have been found to improve depression and produce euphoria. Another factor which suggests that Dopamine maybe an important factor in depression is that patients with Parkinson’s disease show a progressive degeneration of Dopamine containing neurons. Depressive disorders are also associated with abnormal noradrenalin (NA) and serotonin (5-HT) concentrations on the brain. Investigations into plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and postmortem brain tissue in patients with depression has been carried out. No consistent changes of noradrenaline were found in the plasma and csf but there is greater variability in concentration when compared with normal controls. There also appeared to be less serotonergic activity in some types of depression which some antidepressant treatments seemed to reverse. Another challenge to monoamic theories came from the discovery of new antidepressant drugs which do not inhibit neurotransmitter reuptake nor inhibit MAO (eg mianserin). Cocaine and amphetamine have also been found to be NA and 5-HT reuptake inhibitors but fail to have antidepressant properties. A further drawback to the traditional idea of NA and 5-HT synaptic deficiencies theories of depression was the realisation that drug affects at synapses develop rapidly, in a matter of hours or days, while the clinical effects take several weeks to develop. This time course discrepancy and discovery of “atypical” antidepressants which do not effect reuptake have led to fresh approaches to the study of depressive illness. One idea is that the therapeutic effects of antidepressants are not due to changes in transmitter concentration but to changes in receptor sensitivity which occur over a longer time course, in response to the drugs administered in the body. Recent technological advances have given a greater understanding of monoamine receptors. New monoamine receptor subtypes have been identified and this has lead to receptors being classified by protein structure rather than on ligand based classifications. It has also been discovered that there are mul