The Development Of Anatomy And Physiology Essay

, Research Paper

Just like all other science which developed and grew to the sciences we know

today, anatomy and physiology progressed through curiosity, the drive to discover and

understand as well as to ?break the norm of things?, which at the time was Galen.

In the early 1500?s, health science was still a mix of mysticism, religion, science

and incorrect information. Ideas, techniques, and practice were all dominated by these

factors. With the ever watchful eye of the church, change and experiment faced great

scrutiny with any unorthodox, ungodly idea. Hands-on surgeons were nothing more than

butchers, and medical students in certain cases had to resort to grave robbing.

With the ?somewhat? inaccurate writings of Galen influencing many ?physicks?

of the day, the unwillingness to change only proved to be yet another obstacle. But there

were those who would defy, and search for the answers with the drive and devotion

needed to elevate the scientific awareness in medicine.

Galen was one of the most influential Greek writers on science whose works

were the leading authority in medicine and ?physick?. So impressive were Galens?

works that his writings reached and influenced Muslim countries. His work would also

survive the test of time, with his writings reappearing and consulted in time for the

Renaissance, although, some of his works were still being circulated among the Arabs?

much earlier than in Europe.

He understood the importance of dissection and observation and ?was said to be

brilliant in diagnosis?. Galen also knew the importance of experimentation and

hands-on work. ?If anyone wishes to observe the works of Nature, he should put his trust

not in books on anatomy but in his own eyes…but so long as he only reads, he will be

more likely to believe all the earlier anatomists because there are many of them.?

But, despite Galens? infallible writings, it had been discovered that there were

errors in Galens? description of the human anatomy. And it was thanks to one man that

criticism of Galens? works had begun.

Andreas Vesalius was not the typical physick of his day. ?Unlike the professors

before him, Vesalius did not stay seated high in his professorial cathedra. Instead,

Vesalius himself handled the body and dissected the organs.? He had the drive which

was needed to stimulate further advances in physiology. He had an unorthodox method

for gathering specimens for anatomizing. Grave-robbing, corpse scavenging, as morbid

as they may seem, they only went to show Vesalius? willingness and initiative to learn