РефератыИностранный языкMaMacbeth Aristotelian Tragedy Essay Research Paper Macbeth

Macbeth Aristotelian Tragedy Essay Research Paper Macbeth

Macbeth: Aristotelian Tragedy Essay, Research Paper


Macbeth: Aristotelian Tragedy


Kim Blair


Per.5


Interpretive Test


The definition of tragedy in an excerpt from Aristotle’s “Poetics” is


the re-creation, complete within itself, of an important moral action. The


relevance of Aristotle’s Poetics to Shakespeare’s play Macbeth defines the


making of a dramatic tragedy and presents the general principles of the


construction of this genre.


Aristotle’s attention throughout most of his Poetics is directed towards


the requirements and expectations of the plot. Plot, ‘the soul of tragedy’,


Aristotle says, must, be an imitation of a noble and complete action. In


Macbeth, Shakespear provides a complete action, that is it has what Aristotle


identifies as a beginning, a middle, and an end. These divisible sections must,


and do in the case of Macbeth, meet the criterion of their respective placement.


In an excerpt from Aristotle’s “Poetics” it states:


“The separate parts into which tragedy is divided are: Prologue,


Episode, Exodus, Choric songs, this last being divided into Parodos and Stasimon.


The prologos is that entire part of a tragedy which precedes the Parodos of the


Chorus. The Episode is that entire part of a tragedy which is between complete


choric songs. The Exodos is that entire part of a tragedy which has no choric


song after it. Of the Choric part the Parodos is the first undivided utterance


of the Chorus.” Shakespeare follows this precise arrangement of parts to tell


his story of Macbeth. Macbeth is divided into five acts. It contains a


Prologue, Episode, Exodus, Parodos and Stasimon, but is the only one of


Shakespeares plays that does not include Choric songs. This does not dismiss


Macbeth as a tragedy in the Aristotelian sense, because it still follows


Aristotle’s fundamental component of a plot. That the arrangement of actions


and episodes arrange themselves into a ‘causally connected’, seamless whole.


The ideal arrangement of action into a plot is: Exposition, Inciting Action,


Rising Action, Turning Point(Climax), Falling Action, and Denouement. Macbeth


follows each of these steps while introducing a new question every moment that


keeps our interest. That is called dramatic tension, a very important part of a


tragedy: to keep the audiences attention at all times.


To make Macbeth’s plot a complete action, according to Aristotle, the


story must contain an activating circumstance, a disclosure, and a reversal of


action. The activating circumstance in Macbeth is the three witches. Macbeth


and Banqou meet three witches that posses supernatural powers and predict the


two men’s futures. It is part of the wicked sisters’ role in the play to act as


the forces of fate. These hags lead Macbeth on to destroy himself. Their


predictions are temptations of Macbeth’s. They never tell Macbeth he has to do


anything, and nothing the witches did forced him to commit the murderous acts he


did. But their prophecies stimulated his desire for kingship and intensified


his ambition which is the characteristic that led to his downfall. The


disclosure is the point in the play in which the audience finds out something


they did not know before, that enables them to put the pieces of the tragedy


together. It’s the point of realization. In Act V scene 1, Lady Macbeth is


found sleep walking muttering the lines of reassurance she gave her husband


after they murder of Duncan and Banqou, “What need we fear who knows it, when


none can call our power to accompt?”(lines 40-42) and “I tell you yet again,


Banqou’s buried” (lines 66-67). The plot of the tragedy unfolded for the


audience in that scene and it becomes apparent that it was Macbeth’s and Lady


Macbeth’s own evil actions that destroyed themselves. The last guideline of an


Aristotelian complete action is the reversal of action. This occurs when


Macduff kills Macbeth. Throughout the play Macbeth, driven by his corrupt


ambition, went after what he desired most. Even subjecting himself to evil sins,


but it is at the very end where his own ambition kills him. Macbeth’s life ends


in the same way he took the other lives, through murder and deception. Stated


above, Aristotle says, the plot of a Tragedy must be an imitation of a noble and


complete action. Macbeth follows Aristotle’s expectations of a complete action.


Shakespeare’s Macbeth also contains a noble and moral action that creates the


foundation of the plot. Whether Shakespeare provides a nobel action, however,


is an issue of the culture of his time. Macbeth was written during the


Elizabethan age where ambition was highly regarded. Ambition was and is a pious


and admirable quality, one of nobility. So essentially the imitation of action,


the plot, of Macbeth is one of a nobel and complete action.


In accordance with Aristotle’s expectations of a Tragedy, containing a


nobel and complete action, irony is one of the most important elements when


imitating an action. In Shakespeare’s Macbeth there are many ironic statements


regarding the action of murder due to Macbeth’s hamartia (tragic flaw), which is


his ambition. Macbeth’s hamartia (ambition) encouraged by Lady Macbeth resulted


in her death and when Macbeth hears of her death his words are inspired by grief


and despair and full of irony. He calls life a pathetic, strutting actor


briefly on a stage, and then says: “It is a tale/ Told by an idiot, full of


sound

and fury/ Signifying nothing” Act V, scene v, lines 26-28. Macbeth’s


speech says that life is meaningless, but the play as a whole says just the


opposite. Macbeth’s utter despair at that moment is a result of his evil deeds.


The very fact that he and Lady Macbeth are punished for their wickedness is


proof of a higher good which gives meaning to life. In Macbeth the action of


murder and ambition are often referred to in an ironic manner (shown above) but


what draws this play so close to Aristotle’s definition of a tragedy is


Shakespeare’s use of dramatic irony. Integral to Aristotle’s notion of tragedy


was its stylistic component: its diction. Aristotle stated that tragedies are


to be written in elevated, non- everyday language to alert the audience to the


seriousness of what they are about to see. Dramatic irony is a very poignant


example of this theory. Dramatic irony is present when the audience knows


something the characters, or some of the characters, do not, this involves the


audience and draws their attention. When Duncan and his party arrive at


Macbeth’s castle, they are unaware of the wicked plans that are being made.


Their lighthearted, joking mood is ironic to us, because we know what they are


really walking into. The scene-by-scene analysis for Act I scene vi, details


the use of dramatic irony when Duncan realizes that Lord Macbeth isn’t there to


greet him, which is very discourteous but still treats Macbeth with great


admiration, “Conduct me to mine host: we lone him highly/And shall conduct our


graces toward him.” Meanwhile Macbeth is plotting King Duncans murder.


Dramatic irony enriches the last act of the play. Macbeth has become a monster,


but he’s also become a pathetic figure. His desperation is obvious. Ten


thousand troops are on their way to over throw him; his own troops are deserting.


And he places his confidence in the weird sisters- the hags whose suggestion


that he would be king got him into this disaster! We can see that he is doomed,


but he cannot. He fights on, talking about his “charmed life.” His failure (or


refusal) to see what is obvious to us makes the end of the play much more


powerful than it would be otherwise.


Aristotle further states that the noble and complete action must be an


imitation of fearful and pitiable incidents. It is important to define fearful


and pitiable action in Aristotle’s own words before continuing to support a


later point. Aristotle states;


“A perfect tragedy should be arranged not on the simple but on the


complex plan. It should imitate actions which excite pity and fear, this being


the distinctive mark of tragic imitation. It follows that the change of fortune


presented must not be the spectacle of a virtuous man brought from prosperity to


adversity, for this moves neither pity no fear; it merely shocks us. Nor that


of a bad man passing from adversity to prosperity, for nothing can be more alien


to me spirit of tragedy; it possesses no tragic quality, it neither satisfies


the moral sense, no calls forth pity or fear. Nor should the downfall of the


utter villain be exhibited. A plot of this kind would doubtless, satisfy the


moral sense, but it would inspire neither pity no fear, for pity is aroused by


unmerited misfortune, and fear by the misfortune of a person like ourselves.


Such an event, therefore, will be neither pitiful nor terrible. There remains,


then, the character between these two extremes-that of a man who is not


eminently good and just, yet whose misfortune is brought about not by vice or


depravity, but by some error or frailty. He must be one who is highly renowned


and prosperous…”


According to Aristotle, the expectation of a tragedy consists of the arousal of


the emotions of pity and terror in the audience. He also states that “pity and


fear are related to action and character.” We have already detailed the


correlations between the plot(action) in Macbeth and Aristotle’s “Poetics”, now,


we must determine if the character Macbeth is a tragic hero according to


Aristotle’s “The Essential Nature of Tragedy”.


In Aristotle’s “Poetics” he describes the attributes of a tragic hero.


In the excerpt above it mentions “…the character between these two


extremes…”. Basically a good man of elevated stature: if he’s evil, his fall


won’t be pitiable or tragic. If he’s a commoner, his fall won’t be grand enough.


The figure of Macbeth seems to resemble this position. In the beginning of the


play there is strong evidence that Macbeth is a good man. In Act I, Scene ii


his courage is highly praised. The bloody soldier obviously admires his captain,


and Duncan is moved when he is told of Macbeth’s exploits. Shown in such


diction as “brave Macbeth” and “noble Macbeth”. One of the essential natures of


a tragic hero according to Aristotle’s definition of tragedy is the Reversal of


Fortune. The hero must undergo a change of fortune from prosperity (emotional


and/or material) to adversity. This reversal is also known as a tragic fall.


Aristotle continues, this reversal must come about not by chance or as deserved


retribution for evil deeds, but from some hamartia, variously translated as


‘error in judgment’ or ‘tragic flaw’: that is, some aspect of the hero’s


character that in itself is praiseworthy–but in excess, destructive. Macbeth


gains sympathy from the audience due to his demeanor in the beginning of the


play. He relates to the listeners from his reaction to the witc

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Macbeth Aristotelian Tragedy Essay Research Paper Macbeth

Слов:1950
Символов:12864
Размер:25.13 Кб.