РефератыИностранный языкAnAn Analysis Of Chaucer

An Analysis Of Chaucer

’s ‘The Wife Of Bath’s Tale’ Essay, Research Paper


An Analysis of Chaucer’s The Wife of Bath’s Tale


In reading Geoffrey Chaucer’s “Canterbury Tales,” I found


that of the Wife of Bath, including her prologue, to be the most


thought-provoking. The pilgrim who narrates this tale, Alison, is


a gap-toothed, partially deaf seamstress and widow who has been


married five times. She claims to have great experience in the


ways of the heart, having a remedy for whatever might ail it.


Throughout her story, I was shocked, yet pleased to encounter


details which were rather uncharacteristic of the women of


Chaucer’s time. It is these peculiarities of Alison’s tale which


I will examine, looking not only at the chivalric and religious


influences of this medieval period, but also at how she would


have been viewed in the context of this society and by Chaucer


himself.


During the period in which Chaucer wrote, there was a dual


concept of chivalry, one facet being based in reality and the


other existing mainly in the imagination only. On the one hand,


there was the medieval notion we are most familiar with today in


which the knight was the consummate righteous man, willing to


sacrifice self for the worthy cause of the afflicted and weak; on


the other, we have the sad truth that the human knight rarely


lived up to this ideal(Patterson 170). In a work by Muriel


Bowden, Associate Professor of English at Hunter College, she


explains that the knights of the Middle Ages were “merely mounted


soldiers, . . . notorious” for their utter cruelty(18). The tale


Bath’s Wife weaves exposes that Chaucer was aware of both forms


of the medieval soldier. Where as his knowledge that knights


were often far from perfect is evidenced in the beginning of


Alison’s tale where the “lusty” soldier rapes a young maiden;


King Arthur, whom the ladies of the country beseech to spare the


life of the guilty horse soldier, offers us the typical


conception of knighthood.


In addition to acknowledging this dichotomy of ideas about


chivalry, Chaucer also brings into question the religious views


of his time through this tale. The loquacious Alison spends a


good deal of the prologue espousing her views regarding marriage


and virginity, using her knowledge of the scriptures to add


strength to her arguments. For instance, she argues that there


is nothing wrong with her having had five husbands, pointing out


that Solomon had hundreds of wives. In another debate, she argues


that despite the teaching of the Church that virginity is “a


greater good than the most virtuous of marriages,” there is no


biblical comment opposing marriage(Bowden 77). Even though these


ideas may not seem so radical to today’s reader, they would have


been considered blasphemy to people of Chaucer’s time (Howard


143).


The tale itself raises another religious discussion of the


time: Who should have the upper hand within a marriage? King


Arthur gives the task of sentencing the nefarious knight to his


wife, who proposes that his life will be spared if he can find


the answer to the question: “What thing is it that wommen most


desiren?” Following a fruitless search for the answer, the


knight happens upon

a loathsome hag who forces the knight to


marry her after she supplies the answer. After explaining that


women covet power over their husbands most of all, the termagant


begins her goal of obtaining just that. Here it is important to


note that many of the people of England during this time would


have abhorred the woman who attempted to gain sovereignty over


her husband; for the Bible “definitely states that woman is to be


subject to her husband”(Howard 143). Witnessing the young man in


sorrow at his fate, the newlywed woman asks the knight if he


would rather have her be old and faithful or young and possibly


not. When he leaves the decision up to her, thus giving her


authority over him, the hag is magically metamorphosed into a


beautiful, young woman.


Having analyzed the period of Chaucer and how it relates to


the Wife of Bath’s tale, an obvious question arises: How did


Chaucer personally feel about this character which he created?


Does he have the same contempt for this carnal dowager as the


pious masses of the Middle Ages surely would have? Despite my


twentieth century urge to laud Alison of Bath in her being


unrepresentative of the stifling societal norms of fourteenth


century England, I must admit that Chaucer was probably not very


fond of the now revolutionary woman. Although I would like to


think that Chaucer was a remarkably visionary man in setting


forth this particular tale, there are signs which contradict


this. For example, another of Chaucer’s characters, the moral


Clerk, offers a thorough rebuttal of the Wife’s opinions. The


fact that Chaucer would have used such a virtuous man to rebuke


ideas which he himself championed is highly unlikely. Another


detail which supports this opinion is that here we have a woman


who relies heavily on scripture to support her radical stance,


yet Chaucer allows her to err in her application. The mistake


lies in her analogy of the loaves of bread in which she claims


that it was Mark who said Jesus refreshed many men with barley


bread; it was actually John who said this(Justman 125).


While it may be true that my fellow students and I cheer the


rather raunchy weaver, the prevailing standards of idealistic


chivalry and religious misogyny of the Middle Ages kept the Wife


of Bath from being heralded by most people of that same period –


including her creator. Looking past my personal views which lead


me to judge her by current standards, it can be said that despite


her personal flaws, Alison’s tale is the most original of all the


pilgrims’ accounts (Howard 141). Within the context of the


Middle Ages, it was surely a journey beyond the realms of


normalcy, possibly planting the seeds of feminism in the minds of


some medieval mistresses.


Bowden, Muriel. A Reader’s Guide to Geoffrey Chaucer. New York:


Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1964.


Howard, Edwin J. Geoffrey Chaucer. New York: Twayne Publishers,


In., 1964.


Justman, Stewart. “Literal and Symbolic in The Canterbury Tales.”


Modern Critical Views on Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. Harold


Bloom. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1985.


Patterson, Lee. Chaucer and the Subject of History. Wisconsin:


The University of Wisconsin Press, 1991

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: An Analysis Of Chaucer

Слов:1173
Символов:7816
Размер:15.27 Кб.