РефератыИностранный языкGuGustave Flaubert And Madame Bovary Comparisons Essay

Gustave Flaubert And Madame Bovary Comparisons Essay

Gustave Flaubert And Madame Bovary: Comparisons Essay, Research Paper


Gustave Flaubert and Madame Bovary: Comparisons


We would like to think that everything in life is capable, or beyond the


brink of reaching perfection. It would be an absolute dream to look upon each


day with a positive outlook. We try to establish our lives to the point where


this perfection may come true at times, although, it most likely never lasts.


There’s no real perfect life by definition, but instead, the desire and


uncontrollable longing to reach this dream.


In the novel Madame Bovary, it’s easy to relate to the characters as


well as the author of this book. One can notice that they both share a fairly


similar view on life, and that their experiences actually tie in with each other.


Emma Bovary dreamed of a life beyond that of perfection as well. She


realizes that she leads an ordinary and average life, but simply does not want


to abide by it. In the novel, Emma meets a pitiful doctor named Charles Bovary.


The first time they meet, Charles falls instantly in love with her. They begin


to see more and more of each other until Charles asks Emma’s father for her hand


in marriage. They end up getting married and everything goes fine, just like a


normal couple, for awhile. They did things with each other, went out, and were


extremely happy. Although, this love and passion for life shortly ended when


Emma’s true feelings began to come about. We soon come to realize that ?the


story is of a woman whose dreams of romantic love, largely nourished by novels,


find no fulfillment when she is married to a boorish country doctor? (Thorlby


272).


This is completely true because Emma really does get caught up in her


reading. She wonders why she can’t have a flawless love as well as a flawless


life, just as the characters do in the novels she reads.


Once Emma becomes fed up and realizes that he is ?a sad creature?


(Flaubert 78), she begins her little quest to find the right man through a binge


of affairs and broken hearts.


The author of Madame Bovary, Gustave Flaubert, was born in Rouen France


(Kunitz 280). He grew up in a rather wealthy and prosperous family as a result


of his father being a successful doctor (Kunitz 280). This could easily relate


to the fact that Charles Bovary was a doctor too.


During Flaubert’s younger years, he was alone most of the time. He


didn’t have any friends and normally spent his days in solitude. This gave him


time to focus on his literature (Flaubert i). Since Flaubert’s academics and


knowledge of literature were released at such an early age, it is explainable to


see how his profound talent was released (Flaubert i). He began to write plays


at around the age of ten. These were in-depth, romantic plays that adults would


learn to appreciate (Kunitz 280). At that time Flaubert focused his attention


on the study of History and the writings of numerous romantics as well (Kunitz


280).


Flaubert was later sent to an intermediate school in Paris to further


strengthen his academic standings (Kunitz 280). Upon completion of that, he


enrolled into law school but found no interest in it (Thorlby 250). This


allowed him to do some drifting, while taking the time to realize that


literature would be his destiny (Kunitz 281).


Although all of this schooling and work helped Flaubert become an


extremely talented writer, he thought writing to be one of the most difficult


things (De Man xi). He wrote very slowly in fact, while reflecting on his


painful life experiences. It took over five years to perfect his most famous


novel, Madame Bovary (Thorlby 272).


Although some people, as well as I, believe that Flaubert based the


character of Emma Bovary on himself, he was very unhappy with the subject of the


book upon finishing (Thorlby 272). Maybe Flaubert figured her character to be


too provocative and heartless. Otherwise, he might have simply reflected upon


the theme, and thought it to be uninteresting.


In 1856, the novel Madame Bovary was actually condemned as being


pornographic. This was a result of Flaubert’s eminently honest and descriptive


themes. He, along his publisher were charged with offending public morality and


went to trial, but were soon acquitted (Magill 616). This publicity obviously


helped bring the book out into the public while establishing popularity and


praise.


Sure,

Flaubert was probably disappointed when this negative publicity


about Madame Bovary. But, he realized that criticism could be ignored and his


objective is ?to understand humanity, not to explain or reform it? (Magill 616).


By reading Madame Bovary, it’s easy to notice that Flaubert is a


perfectionist. In fact, he sometimes rewrites his books 3-4 times to establish


perfection. When he finished Madame Bovary, he said, ?C’est Moi,? meaning in


French, ?that’s me? (Kunitz 281). This could symbolize the incredible


comparison between Flaubert and the character Emma Bovary.


Although Flaubert detested the thought of being famous, his work titled


him France’s most renowned writer (Magill 617). According to Sainte-Beuve,


Flaubert’s scenes were ?pictures which, if they were painted with a brush as


they are written, would be worthy of hanging in a gallery beside the best genre


painting? (Kunitz 281).


In 1846 Flaubert met the poet Louis Colet, who became his mistress.


Although he admired her, he couldn’t ?find the ideal love? (Kunitz 280). This


could symbolize the comparison between Flaubert and Emma as well. Along with


Louis Colet, Flaubert had a few more adulterous relationships too. But, when


his work became too important, Flaubert gave up everything to devote himself to


his writing. He even broke off his affair with Mme. Colet because got in the


way (Thorlby 272).


Flaubert soon became a pessimist and basically had a cheerless view of


life (Magill 617). He became the victim of nervous apprehension and depression


(Kunitz 282). Flaubert frequently felt with drawled from society and longed to


commit suicide (Kunitz 282). It’s plain to observe that Flaubert was an


idealist that dreamed, just as the characters in his novel did. ?These


perpetual conflicts,? writes Troyat, who has been listing some of the paradoxes


in Flaubert’s life, ?made him a profoundly unhappy man? (Kunitz 282).


Emma would sit on the grass into which she would dig the tip of her


parasol with brief thrusts and would ask herself, ?My God, why did I get married?


(Flaubert 108)? Flaubert was the same way, deliberating whether marriage was


one of the biggest mistakes to have been made or not. ?Madame Bovary,? writes A


de Pontmartin in the correspond and, ?is the pathological glorification of the


senses and of the imagination in a disappointed democracy.? ?It proves once and


for all that realism means literary democracy? (De Man ix). Emma and Flaubert


are very ordinary middle-class people, with banal expectations of life and an


urge to dominate their surroundings. Their personalities are remarkable only


for an unusual defiance of natural feelings (Flaubert 152). People even say


that the myth surrounding the figure of Emma Bovary is so powerful, that one has


to remind oneself that she is fiction and not an actual person (De Man vii).


By reading this book, and accurately analyzing the author’s significant


events, one can plainly conclude that Flaubert actually did tie in those events


with the theme of Madame Bovary. Madame Bovary is a creation of one’s


conscience which can only be explained through the eyes of another. It’s about


love, hate, and destiny, while holding every true emotion in the context as well.


?Something in the destiny of the heroine and of the main supporting characters,


as well as in the destiny of the book itself, surrounds it with the aura of


immortality that belongs only to truly major creations? (De Man vii). And it is


fair to say that Madame Bovary is a true creation, at least one in the eyes of


Gustave Flaubert.


Nick Groth


hour 3


2-29-96


WORKS CITED


De Man, Paul, ed. Gustave Flaubert: Madame Bovary:


Backgrounds and Sources, Essays in Criticisms. New


York: W.W. Norton and Co., 1965


Flaubert, Gustave. Madame Bovary. New York, New


York, 1964


Kunitz, Stanley J., Vineta Colby, eds. European Literature


(Authors) 1800-1900: A Biographical Dictionary


of European Literature. New York: The H.W. Wilson


Co., 1967


Magill, Frank N., ed. Critical Survey of Long Fiction: Foreign


Language Series. vol. 2; New Jersey: Salem Press


Inc., 1984


Magill, Frank N., ed. Cyclopedia of World Authors. New


Jersey: Salem Press Inc., 1958


Thorlby, Anthony, ed. The Penguin Companion to European


Literature. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1969

Сохранить в соц. сетях:
Обсуждение:
comments powered by Disqus

Название реферата: Gustave Flaubert And Madame Bovary Comparisons Essay

Слов:1571
Символов:10431
Размер:20.37 Кб.